Vera Lúcia Alves Carneiro PhD, José Manuel González-Méijome PhD
{"title":"葡萄牙屈光不正患病率-系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Vera Lúcia Alves Carneiro PhD, José Manuel González-Méijome PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2022.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyse epidemiological data of refractive error prevalence in Portugal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A structured search strategy and systematic literature review was applied to multiple databases, such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, official organizations and academic repositorium's, to identify all relevant epidemiological studies in Portugal until February 2021. The outcome measure was the prevalence of refractive error among the Portuguese population. The events and sample size were entered as raw data and the effect size parameters were computed by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 9 studies were pooled for the meta-analysis. The fixed effects model points to an estimated effect size of 43% (95% CI: 41.9–44.1%). However, the statistics of heterogeneity (Q-value <em>p</em> < 0.001; I-squared =99.344) showed very high heterogeneity among studies and recommends using a random-effects model. The random effects model points to an estimated effect size of 31.9% (95% CI: 19.8–47.0%) prevalence of refractive error in the Portuguese population.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A prevalence of refractive error in Portugal of 31.9% (95% CI: 20.0–47.0%) can be considered as a conservative approach to the real burden of this condition. However, it translates into at least 2 to 4.5 million Portuguese individuals with a refractive error. The high heterogeneity between studies, the wide estimate and the random effects involved demonstrate the need for more studies and consistent sources to obtain narrower estimates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 182-188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/3a/main.PMC10323180.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of refractive error in Portugal – A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Vera Lúcia Alves Carneiro PhD, José Manuel González-Méijome PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2022.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyse epidemiological data of refractive error prevalence in Portugal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A structured search strategy and systematic literature review was applied to multiple databases, such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, official organizations and academic repositorium's, to identify all relevant epidemiological studies in Portugal until February 2021. The outcome measure was the prevalence of refractive error among the Portuguese population. The events and sample size were entered as raw data and the effect size parameters were computed by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 9 studies were pooled for the meta-analysis. The fixed effects model points to an estimated effect size of 43% (95% CI: 41.9–44.1%). However, the statistics of heterogeneity (Q-value <em>p</em> < 0.001; I-squared =99.344) showed very high heterogeneity among studies and recommends using a random-effects model. The random effects model points to an estimated effect size of 31.9% (95% CI: 19.8–47.0%) prevalence of refractive error in the Portuguese population.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A prevalence of refractive error in Portugal of 31.9% (95% CI: 20.0–47.0%) can be considered as a conservative approach to the real burden of this condition. However, it translates into at least 2 to 4.5 million Portuguese individuals with a refractive error. The high heterogeneity between studies, the wide estimate and the random effects involved demonstrate the need for more studies and consistent sources to obtain narrower estimates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 182-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/3a/main.PMC10323180.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的系统回顾和荟萃分析葡萄牙屈光不正患病率的流行病学数据。方法采用结构化搜索策略和系统文献综述的方法,对MEDLINE/PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Google Scholar、官方组织和学术库等多个数据库进行检索,在2021年2月之前确定葡萄牙的所有相关流行病学研究。测量结果的指标是葡萄牙人群中屈光不正的患病率。将事件和样本量作为原始数据输入,并通过综合荟萃分析软件计算影响大小参数。结果共有9项研究用于荟萃分析。固定效应模型的估计效应大小为43%(95%置信区间:41.9–44.1%)。然而,异质性统计数据(Q值p<0.001;I平方=99.344)显示,研究之间的异质性非常高,建议使用随机效应模型。随机效应模型指出,葡萄牙人群中屈光误差的患病率估计为31.9%(95%置信区间:19.8-47.0%)。结论葡萄牙的屈光不正患病率为31.9%(95%可信区间:20.0–47.0%),可以认为是衡量这种疾病实际负担的保守方法。然而,这意味着至少有200万至450万葡萄牙人患有屈光不正。研究之间的高度异质性、广泛的估计和所涉及的随机效应表明,需要更多的研究和一致的来源来获得更窄的估计。
Prevalence of refractive error in Portugal – A systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose
The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyse epidemiological data of refractive error prevalence in Portugal.
Methods
A structured search strategy and systematic literature review was applied to multiple databases, such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, official organizations and academic repositorium's, to identify all relevant epidemiological studies in Portugal until February 2021. The outcome measure was the prevalence of refractive error among the Portuguese population. The events and sample size were entered as raw data and the effect size parameters were computed by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software.
Results
A total of 9 studies were pooled for the meta-analysis. The fixed effects model points to an estimated effect size of 43% (95% CI: 41.9–44.1%). However, the statistics of heterogeneity (Q-value p < 0.001; I-squared =99.344) showed very high heterogeneity among studies and recommends using a random-effects model. The random effects model points to an estimated effect size of 31.9% (95% CI: 19.8–47.0%) prevalence of refractive error in the Portuguese population.
Conclusions
A prevalence of refractive error in Portugal of 31.9% (95% CI: 20.0–47.0%) can be considered as a conservative approach to the real burden of this condition. However, it translates into at least 2 to 4.5 million Portuguese individuals with a refractive error. The high heterogeneity between studies, the wide estimate and the random effects involved demonstrate the need for more studies and consistent sources to obtain narrower estimates.