Efficacy of optometric phototherapy: a systematic review

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zaíra Cervera-Sánchez, Pilar Cacho-Martínez, Ángel García-Muñoz
{"title":"Efficacy of optometric phototherapy: a systematic review","authors":"Zaíra Cervera-Sánchez,&nbsp;Pilar Cacho-Martínez,&nbsp;Ángel García-Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To analyse the scientific evidence about the efficacy of Syntonic phototherapy for producing changes in visual function.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed to obtain studies on the effects of Syntonic phototherapy on vision. A search in health science databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO) for studies published between 1980 and 2022 was conducted in accordance with the principles of Cochrane approach. The search identified 197 articles. Only clinical studies which used the Syntonic phototherapy as a vision therapy for any visual condition were included. Clinical cases and case series were excluded. Following the inclusion criteria, 8 clinical studies met inclusion, 5 of them being pseudo-experimental studies with an equivalent control group and 3 pre-post pseudo-experimental studies. GRADE tool was used to assess the certainty of the evidence of the studies. The GRADE evidence profile for the studies through the Soft table was made to analyse data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The studies analysed seven outcomes: visual symptoms, functional visual fields, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, deviation (phoria/tropia), stereopsis and reading abilities. Finding table about results (Soft Table) showed that for all outcomes reviewed, all studies yielded very low certainty of evidence. Results revealed a lack of scientific evidence of the efficacy of Syntonic optometric phototherapy to produce changes in the visual function.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This systematic review found no consistent evidence for the efficacy of Syntonic phototherapy to cause changes in visual function. There is no scientific evidence to support its clinical use for treating any type of visual anomalies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/38/main.PMC10518764.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To analyse the scientific evidence about the efficacy of Syntonic phototherapy for producing changes in visual function.

Material and methods

A systematic review was performed to obtain studies on the effects of Syntonic phototherapy on vision. A search in health science databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO) for studies published between 1980 and 2022 was conducted in accordance with the principles of Cochrane approach. The search identified 197 articles. Only clinical studies which used the Syntonic phototherapy as a vision therapy for any visual condition were included. Clinical cases and case series were excluded. Following the inclusion criteria, 8 clinical studies met inclusion, 5 of them being pseudo-experimental studies with an equivalent control group and 3 pre-post pseudo-experimental studies. GRADE tool was used to assess the certainty of the evidence of the studies. The GRADE evidence profile for the studies through the Soft table was made to analyse data.

Results

The studies analysed seven outcomes: visual symptoms, functional visual fields, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, deviation (phoria/tropia), stereopsis and reading abilities. Finding table about results (Soft Table) showed that for all outcomes reviewed, all studies yielded very low certainty of evidence. Results revealed a lack of scientific evidence of the efficacy of Syntonic optometric phototherapy to produce changes in the visual function.

Conclusion

This systematic review found no consistent evidence for the efficacy of Syntonic phototherapy to cause changes in visual function. There is no scientific evidence to support its clinical use for treating any type of visual anomalies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

验光光疗的疗效:一项系统综述。
目的:分析Syntonic光疗对视觉功能改变的疗效的科学证据。材料和方法:系统回顾Syntonic光疗对视力影响的研究。根据Cochrane方法的原则,在健康科学数据库(Medline、Scopus、Web of science和PsycINFO)中搜索1980年至2022年间发表的研究。搜索发现了197篇文章。仅包括使用Syntonic光疗作为任何视觉状况的视觉治疗的临床研究。排除临床病例和病例系列。根据纳入标准,有8项临床研究符合纳入标准,其中5项为具有等效对照组的伪实验研究,3项为伪实验前后研究。GRADE工具用于评估研究证据的确定性。通过软表对研究的GRADE证据进行分析。结果:研究分析了七个结果:视觉症状、功能视野、视力、对比敏感度、斜视(斜视/斜视)、立体视觉和阅读能力。结果查找表(软表)显示,对于所审查的所有结果,所有研究的证据确定性都很低。结果显示,缺乏科学证据表明Syntonic验光光疗对视觉功能产生影响。结论:本系统综述没有发现一致的证据表明Syntonic光疗能引起视觉功能变化。没有科学证据支持它在临床上用于治疗任何类型的视觉异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信