Studia Psychologica最新文献_第7页

Slovak Version of Internal and External Motivation to Respond without Prejudice Scale 斯洛伐克版无偏见回应的内在动机和外在动机量表

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI: 10.31577/sp.2021.03.825

Drahomír Michalko, J. Plichtová

{"title":"Slovak Version of Internal and External Motivation to Respond without Prejudice Scale","authors":"Drahomír Michalko, J. Plichtová","doi":"10.31577/sp.2021.03.825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2021.03.825","url":null,"abstract":"Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice scale (IEMS) provides a self-report tool sensitive to individual tendencies to control implicit and explicit prejudice without directly inquiring about attitudes toward an outgroup. The current study verified the scale’s psychometric properties and construct validity on a Slovak sample. In line with the predictions, the principal component analysis suggested, and confirmatory factor analysis validated the presence of two uncorrelated factors of internal and external motivation. Additionally, while internal motivation was positively associated with adherence to egalitarianism and negatively with authoritarianism, external motivation did not demonstrate any of these relationships. Furthermore, only external motivation was found to be positively related to expressive self-control that parallels propositions claiming greater self-regulatory demands when egalitarian norms are followed to avoid social disapproval. Finally, both factors were positively correlated with concerns from appearing prejudiced, although internal motivation in a significantly greater degree, reflecting larger dependency on self-oriented concerns. With appropriate values of internal consistency for both factors, the IEMS scale provides a reliable self-report measure that might be used for systematic control of individual differences in the research of social cognition in intergroup context.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89564540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

In search of determinants of time-discounting in monetary choices: Personal characteristics matter only a little 寻找货币选择中时间贴现的决定因素:个人特征只影响很小

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/f52dq

L. Vargová, Matúš Adamkovič

引用次数: 0

A cross-cultural study of purposive “traits of action”: Measurement invariance of scales based on the action–trait theory of human motivation using exploratory structural equation modeling 目的性“行动特质”的跨文化研究:基于人类动机行动特质理论的测量不变性探索性结构方程模型

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI: 10.21697/SP.2021.21.1.01

L. Bernard, Jan Cieciuch, Andrew Lac, Barbara Žuro, Dino Krupić, M. Richter, N. Silvestrini, Bettina von Helversen

{"title":"A cross-cultural study of purposive “traits of action”: Measurement invariance of scales based on the action–trait theory of human motivation using exploratory structural equation modeling","authors":"L. Bernard, Jan Cieciuch, Andrew Lac, Barbara Žuro, Dino Krupić, M. Richter, N. Silvestrini, Bettina von Helversen","doi":"10.21697/SP.2021.21.1.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/SP.2021.21.1.01","url":null,"abstract":"The Action–Trait theory of human motivation posits that individual differences in predispositional traits of action may account for variance in contemporary purposeful human behavior. Prior research has supported the theory, psychometric properties of scales designed to assess the motive dimensions of the theory, and the utility of these scales to predict an array of behaviors, but this is the first study to evaluate the cross-linguistical invariance of the 15-factor theoretical model. This study evaluated translations of the English language 60-item Quick AIM in 5 samples – Croatian (N = 614), French (N = 246), German (N = 154), Polish (M = 314), and U.S. English (N = 490) – recruited from 4 countries (Croatia, Poland, Switzerland, and the U.S.). Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) supported the theoretical model on which the traits of action are based and scrutinized the measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar invariance) of the scale across the languages.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91096681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Kurt Lewin (1890–1947) – w oczach jego biografów

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI: 10.21697/sp.2021.21.1.02

Włodzisław Zeidler

引用次数: 0

Kontrowersje wokół pojęcia trafności

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI: 10.21697/sp.2021.21.1.03

J. Rytel

引用次数: 1

The role of personality, conspiracy mentality, REBT irrational beliefs, and adult attachment in COVID-19 related health behaviors 人格、阴谋心理、REBT非理性信念和成人依恋在COVID-19相关健康行为中的作用

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/q2nye

S. Stanković, L. Lazarević, G. Knežević

引用次数: 7

Does Action vs. State Orientation Really Matter in the Susceptibility to Sunk Cost Fallacy? A Conceptual Replication Study 在沉没成本谬误的易感性中，行动取向和状态取向真的重要吗?概念复制研究

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.31577/SP.2021.02.823

Miroslava Galasová, Matúš Grežo

{"title":"Does Action vs. State Orientation Really Matter in the Susceptibility to Sunk Cost Fallacy? A Conceptual Replication Study","authors":"Miroslava Galasová, Matúš Grežo","doi":"10.31577/SP.2021.02.823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/SP.2021.02.823","url":null,"abstract":"The theory of action versus state orientation suggests that state-oriented people are more susceptible to sunk cost fallacy than action-oriented people because they ruminate about past costs and are reluctant to change their course of actions. However, research on the role of action versus state orientation in sunk cost fallacy is fairly limited. Therefore, the present paper aims to conceptually replicate the seminal study by van Putten et al. (2010) and verify whether action versus state orientation really matters in the susceptibility to sunk cost fallacy. We also examined the role of gender and goal internalization in the susceptibility to sunk cost fallacy. Participants (N = 205) filled an Action Control Scale and solved two sunk cost fallacy tasks in two experimental conditions. In the intrapersonal condition, the sunk costs belonged to a decision-maker. In the intrapersonal condition, an investor was not identical with the decision-maker. Eventually, our study failed to replicate the results of van Putten et al. (2010). Action versus state orientation did not predict the susceptibility to sunk cost fallacy. Moreover, neither gender nor internalization moderated the relationship between action versus state orientation and susceptibility to sunk cost fallacy. We suggest further replications to examine the roles of reluctance to change and rumination in the relationship between action versus state orientation and susceptibility to sunk cost fallacy. Our findings also highlight the importance of high-powered replications that are an essential part of good research practice.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"74 1","pages":"143-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78945040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Analytic Cognitive Style and Conspiracy Mentality as Predictors of Conspiracy Beliefs 分析性认知风格与阴谋心理作为阴谋信念的预测因子

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.31577/sp.2021.02.819

Eva Ballová Mikušková

引用次数: 3

Cognitive Predictors of Delay Discounting in Monetary Choices 货币选择中延迟贴现的认知预测因素

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.31577/SP.2021.02.817

V. Bačová, Jakub Šrol

引用次数: 5

Maladaptive Personality Traits, Religiosity and Spirituality as Predictors of Epistemically Unfounded Beliefs 不适应的人格特征，宗教信仰和灵性作为认识论上没有根据的信仰的预测因素

IF 1.2 4区心理学

Studia Psychologica Pub Date : 2021-05-19 DOI: 10.31577/SP.2021.02.820

Peter Teličák, P. Halama

{"title":"Maladaptive Personality Traits, Religiosity and Spirituality as Predictors of Epistemically Unfounded Beliefs","authors":"Peter Teličák, P. Halama","doi":"10.31577/SP.2021.02.820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31577/SP.2021.02.820","url":null,"abstract":"The present research focuses on the question whether spirituality, religiosity and maladaptive personality traits, as measured by the PID-5 (antagonism, psychoticism, disinhibition, negative affectivity, detachment), predict epistemologically unfounded beliefs (EUB). The sample included 829 participants recruited through social networks (58% women, mean age 29,98 years). EUB was measured by the Scale of Epistemologically Unfounded Beliefs (Halama, 2019b), which measures three types of EUB: conspiracy, pseudoscientific, and paranormal beliefs. Pathological personality traits were measured by the Short Personality Questionnaire for DSM-5 (PID5-BF, Kruger et al, 2013), spirituality by the Questionnaire of Daily Spirituality (Underwood, 2011) and religiosity by The Religiosity Questionnaire (Storch et al., 2004). The results showed that especially psychoticism is a positive predictor of all EUBs. Spirituality and religiosity predicted only paranormal beliefs. Results confirmed maladaptive personality traits, religiosity, and spirituality can play a significant role in EUB and should be taken into account when considering sources of EUB at the individual level.","PeriodicalId":45798,"journal":{"name":"Studia Psychologica","volume":"5 1","pages":"175-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88305864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2