International Journal of Lexicography最新文献_第10页

Insights into Old English lexicography: lemmatisation of gĀn and its prefix-formations using a corpus-based database 对古英语词典编纂的见解：使用基于语料库的数据库对gĀn及其前缀构成的旅名化

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI: 10.1093/ijl/ecab014

Laura García Fernández

{"title":"Insights into Old English lexicography: lemmatisation of gĀn and its prefix-formations using a corpus-based database","authors":"Laura García Fernández","doi":"10.1093/ijl/ecab014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecab014","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article contributes to Old English lexicography by providing a list of lemmas and inflectional forms for the Old English derived verbs (prefixed verbs) of gān ‘to go’. Entries for these lemmas, if listed by Old English dictionaries, are often incomplete, but, more importantly, they are not based on a lemmatised corpus. This is particularly problematic in the case of languages like Old English that are rife with morphological variation. The methodology followed in this study comprises searches on a lexical database and manual revision of the hits. The searches are launched on the lemmatiser Norna, and the hits are checked with available lexicographical sources, secondary sources and annotated corpora. Finally, ambiguous cases are examined in their context. The final list of lemmas and inflectional forms amounts to 104 inflectional forms which are attributed to 14 different lemmas, including one lemma and up to 61 inflectional forms never before listed by dictionaries. Special attention is paid to the contrast between what is attested in the Old English corpora and what is available from the sources. In addition to providing insights into the inventory of lemmas and inflectional forms for the derivatives (prefixed verbs) of the verb gān as attested in The Dictionary of Old English Corpus, which was not available until now from lexicographical sources, this article contributes recommendations for the linguistic analysis of Old English using corpus-based lexical databases.","PeriodicalId":45657,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lexicography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46136182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Semantic Aspects of National Varieties of Spanish in a Dictionary of Neologisms, the Antenario 《天线词典》中西班牙语民族变体的语义特征

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI: 10.1093/IJL/ECAB010

Andreína Adelstein, Victoria de los Ángeles Boschiroli

引用次数: 0

The presence of Brazilian neologisms in dictionaries 词典中巴西新词的出现

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI: 10.1093/IJL/ECAB011

I. M. Alves, Bruno Maroneze

引用次数: 0

The use of online writing tools by learners of English: Evidence from a process corpus 英语学习者使用在线写作工具:来自过程语料库的证据

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1093/IJL/ECAB012

Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Samantha Laporte

引用次数: 2

A Corpus Too Small: Uses of Text Data in a Hupa-English Bilingual Dictionary 语料库太小：胡巴双语词典中文本数据的使用

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-05-25 DOI: 10.1093/IJL/ECAB006

J. Spence

引用次数: 2

Pedro A. Fuertes-Olivera. (ed.) 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Lexicography 佩德罗A.富尔特斯-奥利维拉。（编辑）2018。劳特利奇词典学手册

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-04-14 DOI: 10.1093/IJL/ECAB008

Huaguo Lu, Ya Zhang

引用次数: 0

Single-clause when-defining models in English monolingual pedagogical dictionaries 英语单语教学词典中单句模式的定义

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-03-23 DOI: 10.1093/ijl/ecaa021

Bartosz Ptasznik

{"title":"Single-clause when-defining models in English monolingual pedagogical dictionaries","authors":"Bartosz Ptasznik","doi":"10.1093/ijl/ecaa021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecaa021","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The paper is concerned with the single-clause when-definition, which is a common folk-defining style that has been established by lexicographers in English monolingual learners’ dictionaries (the Big Five), especially the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English and Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. In brief, the single-clause when-definition format can be applied to explain the meaning of abstract nouns and it closely resembles the double-clause (full-sentence) definition, which can also begin with a subordinating conjunction such as when or if. However, the when-definition does not include the word which is being defined (definiendum) and it is formed out of a single, subordinate clause. This definition-type has received metalexicographers’ attention as it appears to, in general, limit the effectiveness of correct extraction of word class information from abstract noun entries in contrast to the traditional defining model – the analytical definition. In this paper, an attempt is made to investigate two types of single-clause when-defining models: (1) when + personal pronoun; and (2) when + indefinite pronoun (someone/something).1 The collected evidence from the Linear Mixed-effects Modelling analysis indicates that the effect of when-definition type on syntactic class identification accuracy is statistically significant at the 8% level of significance, with the when + personal pronoun defining style being the superior defining model.","PeriodicalId":45657,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lexicography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ijl/ecaa021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45887855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Meaning and Grammar in the light of Corpus Pattern Analysis 从语料库模式分析看语义和语法

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-03-23 DOI: 10.1093/ijl/ecaa027

Patrick Hanks, Wulin Ma

{"title":"Meaning and Grammar in the light of Corpus Pattern Analysis","authors":"Patrick Hanks, Wulin Ma","doi":"10.1093/ijl/ecaa027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecaa027","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article presents an interview with Professor Patrick Hanks, a British lexicographer and corpus linguist, who proposes a new approach – a corpus-driven, phraseological approach – to lexicography. Hanks has developed a procedure called Corpus Pattern Analysis (CPA), which is the foundation of The Pattern Dictionary of English Verbs (in progress). The basic aim of CPA is to explore the relationship between word meaning and patterns of word use. Hanks maintains that the verb is ‘the pivot of the clause’. Verb meanings – or, rather, the meanings of clauses – are mapped onto phraseological patterns, rather than just being listed for words in isolation. Associated with this is the Theory of Norms and Exploitations (TNE), which was discussed in his monograph published by MIT Press in 2013. In this interview, Professor Hanks outlines his vision of a phraseological dictionary of the future (an alternative to WordNet). He discusses meaning and grammar in the light of Corpus Pattern Analysis. Specifically, he explains the procedure of Corpus Pattern Analysis, and the objectives of the Pattern Dictionary of English Verbs (PDEV), including the light that such work can shed on the relationship between language and logic. He discusses the relationship between PDEV and English grammar, his evaluation of generative linguistics, and his views on Noam Chomsky. He also highlights the contributions made by linguists of the past to the understanding of the nature of meaning in language. He goes on to suggest that any new bilingual dictionary with Chinese as a source language should be based on careful analyses of actual language use, both in Chinese and in the various target languages.","PeriodicalId":45657,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lexicography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ijl/ecaa027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47498772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Is digital always better? Comparing two English print dictionaries with their digital counterparts 数字化总是更好吗？两本英文印刷版词典与数字版词典的比较

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-03-23 DOI: 10.1093/ijl/ecaa016

Emma Ferrett, Stefan Dollinger

{"title":"Is digital always better? Comparing two English print dictionaries with their digital counterparts","authors":"Emma Ferrett, Stefan Dollinger","doi":"10.1093/ijl/ecaa016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecaa016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In this paper we discuss advantages and disadvantages of e-dictionaries over print dictionaries in order to answer one increasingly relevant question: is digital always better? We compare the e-content from Oxford University Press and Merriam-Webster flagship dictionaries against their most recent print counterparts. The resulting data shows that the move from print to digital, against popular perception, results in a loss of lexicographical detail and scope. After assessing the user-friendliness of the e-dictionaries’ sites in both desktop and mobile app formats, we conclude that Merriam-Webster currently utilizes the digital medium somewhat better, while Oxford University Press is the current market leader in collaborations with tech giants such as Google. Most crucially, however, both companies have yet to devise and implement optimal ways to balance advertising noise and lexicographical content. Finally, we compare the virtual popularity of e-dictionaries according to their social media efforts and product partnerships. The greatest problem e-dictionaries currently face is that content does routinely change in unspecified and even undocumented ways. Despite these significant disadvantages, the convenience of mobile online accessibility appears to outweigh the concern with the reliability and quality of content.","PeriodicalId":45657,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lexicography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ijl/ecaa016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41287394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

R. M. W. Dixon. 2018. The Unmasking of English Dictionaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press R. M. W. Dixon, 2018。英语词典的揭秘。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社

IF 0.5 2区文学

International Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2021-03-09 DOI: 10.1093/IJL/ECAB004

Xiangming Zhang, Hai Xu

引用次数: 0