International Review of Social Psychology最新文献_第4页

How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter! 人们在失败或成功后如何评估自己的自信和能力:(经济)后果很重要!

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.692

Delphine Miraucourt, Sylvain Caruana, P. Mollaret

引用次数: 1

Do We Know Whom to Trust? A Review on Trustworthiness Detection Accuracy 我们知道该信任谁吗?可信度检测精度研究进展

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.623

Sebastian Siuda, Thomas Schlösser, D. Fetchenhauer

引用次数: 0

The Yellow Vests in France: Psychosocial Determinants and Consequences of the Adherence to a Social Movement in a Representative Sample of the Population 法国的黄背心:在人口的代表性样本中坚持社会运动的社会心理决定因素和后果

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.556

Pascal Wagner-Egger, J. Adam‐Troian, Laurent Cordonier, F. Cafiero, G. Bronner

引用次数: 7

Robustness Tests Replicate Corneille et al.’s (2020) Fake News by Repetition Effect 稳健性测试通过重复效应复制Corneille等人(2020)的假新闻

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.683

J. Béna, O. Corneille, A. Mierop, C. Unkelbach

引用次数: 4

Young Greeks’ Social Representation of Protest: Dialogical Structure and Ideological Function 希腊青年抗议的社会表征:对话结构与意识形态功能

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.648

Alexandros Vlazakis, A. Baka, Lia Figgou

引用次数: 0

Unaware Attitude Formation in the Surveillance Task? Revisiting the Findings of Moran et al. (2021) 监视任务中无意识的态度形成?重新审视Moran等人的发现(2021)

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.546

Benedek Kurdi, I. Hussey, Christoph Stahl, Sean Hughes, C. Unkelbach, M. Ferguson, O. Corneille

引用次数: 4

Are Past and Future Selves Perceived Differently from Present Self? Replication and Extension of Pronin and Ross (2006) Temporal Differences in Trait Self-Ascription 过去和未来的自我与现在的自我不同吗？Pronin和Ross的复制和扩展（2006）特质自归属的时间差异

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.571

N. Adelina, G. Feldman

{"title":"Are Past and Future Selves Perceived Differently from Present Self? Replication and Extension of Pronin and Ross (2006) Temporal Differences in Trait Self-Ascription","authors":"N. Adelina, G. Feldman","doi":"10.5334/irsp.571","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.571","url":null,"abstract":"We attempted a pre-registered replication and extension of Studies 1, 2, and 3 from Pronin and Ross (2006) regarding the effects of social and temporal distance on trait attributions with an online American Amazon MTurk sample (N = 911). We concluded mixed findings. We found support for the original findings: participants attributed more dispositional traits to others compared to themselves, although with weaker effects (original: f = 0.35, 95% CI [0.09, 0.61]; replication: f = 0.10, 95% CI [0.03, 0.16]). Also, similar to the original, we found that participants tended to attribute a favorable ratio of positive traits when mak ing self-assessments (original: f = 0.77, 95% CI [0.29, 1.25]; replication: f = 0.88, 95% CI [0.50, 1.26]). However, unlike the original, we failed to find support for the core hypothesis that participants would ascribe more dispositional traits to their temporally distant self compared to their present self (original: f = 0.54, 95% CI [0.27, 0.77]; replication: f = 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.06]). Furthermore, in contrast to the original, we found that the positive traits ratio increases with temporal distance (original: f = 0.16, 95% CI [0.00, 0.36]; replication: f = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22, 0.42] in the opposite direction). Contrary to our hypothesis, in an extension, we found that people were more likely to ascribe a greater ratio of positive traits to their friends than to themselves ( 𝜉 = 0.3, 95% CI [0.21, 0.38]). All materials, data, and code are provided here: https://osf.io/gs2rx/ .","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44049832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

The Impact of Masculinity Beliefs and Political Ideologies on Men’s Backlash Against Non-Traditional Men: The Moderating Role of Perceived Men’s Feminization 男性信仰和政治意识形态对男性反抗非传统男性的影响:感知男性女性化的调节作用

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-10-22 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.588

Vincenzo Iacoviello, G. Valsecchi, Jacques Berent, Islam Borinca, J. Falomir-Pichastor

{"title":"The Impact of Masculinity Beliefs and Political Ideologies on Men’s Backlash Against Non-Traditional Men: The Moderating Role of Perceived Men’s Feminization","authors":"Vincenzo Iacoviello, G. Valsecchi, Jacques Berent, Islam Borinca, J. Falomir-Pichastor","doi":"10.5334/irsp.588","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.588","url":null,"abstract":"Traditional masculinity norms are still prevalent in our societies. As a result, men who deviate from these norms face adverse reactions (i.e., backlash), mainly from other men. The present research investigated whether the perceived threat to gender status quo accounts for this phenomenon. In two studies using a sample of heterosexual men (N total = 338), we measured male participants’ endorsement of traditional masculinity beliefs and their political orientation. As a means of examining the role of threat to the gender status quo, we then manipulated whether traditional masculinity norms remained stable (stability) or changed across time (men’s feminization). Finally, we assessed participants’ evaluation of men who deviate from traditional masculinity norms (i.e., a backlash against a non-traditional man). This target was either compared to a traditional man (Study 1) or a traditional woman (Study 2). The general hypothesis was that men who are strongly motivated to maintain the gender status quo (i.e., those who endorse traditional masculinity beliefs to a higher extent or support right-wing political ideologies) should show greater backlash, particularly when the gender status quo is threatened (i.e., in the men’s feminization condition). The results of a small-scale meta-analysis supported our hypothesis. We discuss the impact of these findings on the gender literature.","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46889447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Asymmetrical update of beliefs about future outcomes is driven by outcome valence and social group membership 未来结果信念的不对称更新是由结果效价和社会群体成员驱动的

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-27 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/27htj

Mihai Dricu, S. Bührer, D. Moser, T. Aue

{"title":"Asymmetrical update of beliefs about future outcomes is driven by outcome valence and social group membership","authors":"Mihai Dricu, S. Bührer, D. Moser, T. Aue","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/27htj","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/27htj","url":null,"abstract":"People are eager to update their beliefs, such as a perceived risk, if they receive information that is better than expected but are reluctant to do so when the evidence is unfavourable. When estimating the likelihood of future outcomes, this phenomenon of asymmetrical belief update helps generate and maintain personal optimism bias. In this study, we investigated whether asymmetrical belief update also extends to estimating the future of other individuals. Specifically, we prompted respondents to assess the perceived likelihood of three social targets experiencing future positive and negative events: an in-group, a mild out-group and an extreme out-group. We then provided the respondents with feedback about the base rates of those events in the general population and prompted them to re-assess their initial estimates for all social targets. Respondents expected more positive than negative outcomes for the in-group and the mild out-group, but more negative outcomes for the extreme out-group. We also found an asymmetrical update of beliefs contingent on the valence of the future event and the social target. For negative outcomes, respondents updated more following good news than bad news, particularly for the mild out-group. For positive outcomes, respondents equally updated their beliefs following good news and bad news for the in-group and the mild out-group. However, they updated their beliefs significantly more following bad news than good news for the extreme out-group member. Our data thus reveal the strong and robust influence of social stereotypes on future expectancies for others.","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43985177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A Uniform Conspiracy Mindset or Differentiated Reactions to Specific Conspiracy Beliefs? Evidence From Latent Profile Analyses 统一的阴谋心态还是对特定阴谋信念的不同反应?来自潜在侧面分析的证据

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/zcjur

M. Frenken, R. Imhoff

{"title":"A Uniform Conspiracy Mindset or Differentiated Reactions to Specific Conspiracy Beliefs? Evidence From Latent Profile Analyses","authors":"M. Frenken, R. Imhoff","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/zcjur","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zcjur","url":null,"abstract":"Conspiracy theories arise for virtually any public event (e.g., pandemics, assassinations, disasters). In light of positively correlated endorsements of such beliefs, many have pointed to a more general mindset behind this. Others have argued against this notion of a consistent mindset. Applying Latent Profile Analyses, we examine the evidence for either uniform or differentiated response patterns to various items in five studies (reanalyzed datasets, total N = 7877). Overall, the results speak strongly to uniform reactions that could be summarized as a general mindset, but also revealed important qualifications. First, small parts of the samples show more differentiated patterns in relation to extraterrestrial cover-up narratives (Studies 2 to 4) or contradictory theories (Study 5). Second, indicators dealing with the general suppression of relevant information in the public were among the items with the highest approval ratings across all classes. One discussed implication is that existing scales are useful tools to measure conspiracy mindsets. Another implication is that the average endorsement of any conspiracy theory is a function of both the respondents’ conspiracy mindset and the item’s psychometric difficulty, strongly suggesting interpreting item endorsement only in relative terms, but refraining from interpreting a high agreement as an absolute number.","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46530785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16