International Review of Social Psychology最新文献_第3页

Social Network Sites and Well-Being: Is it Only a Matter of Content? 社交网站和幸福:仅仅是内容的问题吗?

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.736

A. Masciantonio, Maxime Résibois, P. Bouchat, D. Bourguignon

引用次数: 1

The Limits of the Primacy of Morality Hypothesis: Are Global Impressions of Experts Based Mainly on their Competence or Morality? 道德至上假说的局限性:专家的全球印象主要基于他们的能力还是道德?

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.643

K. Stasiuk, M. Paruzel-Czachura, R. Polczyk, J. Maciuszek

引用次数: 1

What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Others? Evidence for the Primacy of the Horizontal Dimension of Social Evaluation in Workplace Gossip 当我们谈论他人时，我们谈论什么？职场流言中社会评价水平维度首要性的证据

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.687

E. Martinescu, K. Peters, B. Beersma

引用次数: 0

Social Evaluation at a Distance – Facets of Stereotype Content about Student Groups in Higher Distance Education 远距离社会评价——高等远程教育学生群体刻板印象内容的面向

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.686

Nathalie Bick, L. Froehlich, Maria‐Therese Friehs, P. Kotzur, Helen Landmann

{"title":"Social Evaluation at a Distance – Facets of Stereotype Content about Student Groups in Higher Distance Education","authors":"Nathalie Bick, L. Froehlich, Maria‐Therese Friehs, P. Kotzur, Helen Landmann","doi":"10.5334/irsp.686","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.686","url":null,"abstract":"In the academic domain, belonging to a negatively stereotyped group can impair performance and peer relationships. In higher distance education, stereotypes may be particularly influential as face-to-face contact is limited and non-traditional students who are at risk of being stereotyped are overrepresented. Still, research on stereotypes in higher distance education is sparse. The current research addresses this gap by investigating the Big Two of social perception (warmth, competence) and subordinate facets (friendliness, morality, assertiveness, ability, conscientiousness) in the context of higher distance education. It tests a) how well models with warmth/competence or the facets fit the data, b) whether stereotypes in higher distance education depend on the student group, and c) how the Big Two and subordinate facets predict intergroup emotions and behavioral intentions in higher distance education. An online survey with N = 626 students (74% female) of a large distance university showed that a measurement model with four facets (i.e., friendliness, morality, ability, conscientiousness) reveals adequate model fit for 12 student groups. Perceived stereotypes were positive for female","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41568120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Facets of Social Hierarchy: How Judges’ Legitimacy Beliefs and Relative Status Shape Their Evaluation of Assertiveness and Ability 社会等级的各个方面:法官的合法性信念和相对地位如何影响他们对自信和能力的评价

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.695

V. Yzerbyt, Julien Barbedor, Antonin Carrier, O. Rohmer

{"title":"The Facets of Social Hierarchy: How Judges’ Legitimacy Beliefs and Relative Status Shape Their Evaluation of Assertiveness and Ability","authors":"V. Yzerbyt, Julien Barbedor, Antonin Carrier, O. Rohmer","doi":"10.5334/irsp.695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.695","url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary approaches of impression formation and stereotypes celebrate the role of the Big Two in social evaluation: the horizontal and vertical dimensions (Abele et al., 2021). Recently, interest has grown in making further distinctions within each of these dimensions (Abele et al., 2008). Here, we focused on the vertical facets, namely, assertiveness and ability. Research found that assertiveness is more strongly related to a target’s status than ability. Arguably, this pattern emerges because assertiveness comes across as less negotiable, whereas ability leaves more room for appreciation. Building on this assumption, we reasoned that judgments of ability provide more opportunity to justify or to reclaim positive identity, depending on one’s position in the hierarchy. Specifically, we hypothesized that the legitimacy beliefs and status of the judges are key factors to consider in that they moderate the perceived overlap between the vertical facets. Using a novel paradigm based on Goodman et al.’s (2001) social ladder, Studies 1a and 1b relied on judges’ legitimacy beliefs as a proxy for status, whereas Studies 2 and 3 directly examined the judges’ relative status. As predicted, we consistently found more overlap between assertiveness and ability among high-legitimacy/status judges than among low-legitimacy/status","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46582047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Economic Inequality Perception Dampens Meritocratic Belief in China: The Mediating Role of Perceived Distributive Unfairness 经济不平等感知抑制中国精英主义信念：分配不公平感知的中介作用

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.673

Xueli Zhu, Lei Cheng, Zifei Li, Lijuan Xiao, Fang Wang

引用次数: 1

For Powerholders ‘More is More’: Power Shapes Judgments of Logically Equivalent Comparative Statements 对掌权者来说，“多即是多”:权力塑造逻辑等价比较陈述的判断

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.598

Karl-Andrew Woltin, A. Guinote, Cátia P Teixeira

{"title":"For Powerholders ‘More is More’: Power Shapes Judgments of Logically Equivalent Comparative Statements","authors":"Karl-Andrew Woltin, A. Guinote, Cátia P Teixeira","doi":"10.5334/irsp.598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.598","url":null,"abstract":"Human judgments are inherently comparative. Recently, a so-called more-less asymmetry in comparative communication has been demonstrated: ‘more than’ comparisons are preferred to corresponding ‘less than’ comparisons. Here we show that a ubiquitous social-structural factor – social power – shapes biases in such comparisons. Powerholders, relative to powerless individuals, liked more, agreed more with and considered more likely to be true ‘more than’ compared to ‘less than’ statements. This was true despite the fact that the differently formulated statements were logically equivalent. In Study 1 ( N = 153), induced high power (vs. control or low power) led to believing that ‘more than’ statements were more likely to be true. In Studies 2A/B ( N = 449) the judgments of participants in high power conditions were more favorable when comparisons were made using ‘more than’ comparisons. This was also the case in a pilot study ( N = 149) in which individual differences in chronic sense of power were assessed. These findings suggest that powerholders’ decisions based on comparative information are especially prone to the more-less judgmental bias resulting in asymmetry. They are in line with approaches positing that power increases and lack of power decreases reliance on subjective experiences, including – but not limited to – ease of information processing and the use of fast and frugal strategies in judgment and decision-making.","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42669377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Assessing the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Succession, Identity and Consumption (SIC) Scale Across Four French-Speaking Countries 传承、认同和消费量表在四个法语国家的跨文化有效性评估

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.544

Valérian Boudjemadi, B. Chauvin, Stéphane Adam, Charlay Indoumou-Peppe, M. Lagacé, F. Lalot, Wojciech Świątkowski, K. Gana

引用次数: 1

Examining the Structural Validity of Stereotype Content Scales – A Preregistered Re-Analysis of Published Data and Discussion of Possible Future Directions 检验刻板印象内容量表的结构效度——对已发表数据的预登记再分析及未来可能方向的讨论

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-02-09 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.613

Maria‐Therese Friehs, P. Kotzur, Johanna Böttcher, Ann-Kristin C. Zöller, Tabea Lüttmer, Uli Wagner, F. Asbrock, Maarten H. W. van Zalk

引用次数: 6

‘When Theories Meet’: Approaching Intergroup Contact from a Self-Determination Theory Perspective “当理论相遇”:从自我决定理论的角度看待群体间接触

IF 2.5 4区心理学

International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.681

Johanna Böttcher, Maria‐Therese Friehs

引用次数: 1