International Review of Social Psychology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Fear of Being Supplanted: Intergroup Competition Over Prototypicality and Identity Threats Within Social Movements. 被取代的恐惧:社会运动中对原型和身份威胁的群体间竞争。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.951
Pauline Grippa, Laurent Licata
{"title":"Fear of Being Supplanted: Intergroup Competition Over Prototypicality and Identity Threats Within Social Movements.","authors":"Pauline Grippa, Laurent Licata","doi":"10.5334/irsp.951","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.951","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated reactions to the emergence of supplanting subgroups among members of dominant subgroups of a social movement. Supplanting subgroups are ideologically and strategically distinct from dominant subgroups and attract social recognition from the general public; thus, they could be perceived as competitors for the status of the movement's prototypical subgroup. Across three experimental studies, we investigated reactions to supplanting subgroups in comparison to allied subgroups within the movement and ideologically opposing groups to the movement. Supplanting subgroups triggered less negative reactions than ideologically opposing groups but more than allied subgroups. Moreover, they triggered similar levels of symbolic and realistic threat and as much (Study 3) or more (Study 2) competition over prototypicality than ideologically opposing groups. Symbolic threat and competition over prototypicality mediated some of the effects of the type of group on intergroup relations. These findings suggest that, along with symbolic threat, competition over prototypicality can play an important role in shaping conflicts within social movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"38 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372776/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145066045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
'Do Good, Expect the Worst': The Indirect Effect of Social Cynicism on Prosocial Behavior via Empathy and Trust. “做好事,做最坏的打算”:社会犬儒主义通过同理心和信任对亲社会行为的间接影响。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.1009
Denis Coca, Alin Gavreliuc
{"title":"'Do Good, Expect the Worst': The Indirect Effect of Social Cynicism on Prosocial Behavior via Empathy and Trust.","authors":"Denis Coca, Alin Gavreliuc","doi":"10.5334/irsp.1009","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.1009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Do cynical individuals still engage in prosocial behaviors when they expect the worst from others? While prior research suggests cynical beliefs reduce empathy and trust-key drivers of prosociality-this pathway remains underexplored. We tested four structural equation models (manifest and latent) using data from 239 Romanian adults. Only the manifest model supported an indirect effect via empathic concern; latent models accounting for measurement error did not. This discrepancy highlights how item-level variance may inflate observed relationships. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed considering the social axioms model and empathy-trust mechanisms in prosocial behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"38 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372807/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concerns About Replicability Across Two Crises in Social Psychology. 对两个社会心理学危机的可复制性的关注。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.1036
Daniël Lakens
{"title":"Concerns About Replicability Across Two Crises in Social Psychology.","authors":"Daniël Lakens","doi":"10.5334/irsp.1036","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.1036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twice in the history of social psychology has there been a crisis of confidence. The first started in the 1960s and lasted until the end of the 1970s, and the second crisis dominated the 2010s. Drawing on extensive quotes from articles published during both crises, I examine the similarities and differences between these psychological crises. In this first of two articles, I focus on how researchers discussed fundamental concerns about the replicability of findings across the two crises. I reflect on five possible reasons why concerns about failed replications received more attention during the second crisis, the continuing lack of incentives to perform replication studies, and the importance of large-scale research projects to instigate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"38 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372764/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concerns About Theorizing, Relevance, Generalizability, and Methodology Across Two Crises in Social Psychology. 对社会心理学两大危机的理论化、相关性、概括性和方法论的关注。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.1038
Daniël Lakens
{"title":"Concerns About Theorizing, Relevance, Generalizability, and Methodology Across Two Crises in Social Psychology.","authors":"Daniël Lakens","doi":"10.5334/irsp.1038","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.1038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During two crises in social psychology, the first from the 1960s to the end of the 1970s, and the second starting in 2010 and still ongoing, researchers discussed the strength of theories in the field, the societal relevance of research, the generalizability of effects, and problematic methodological and statistical practices. Continuing on the first part of this review, which focused on replicability, I compare similarities in the concerns raised across both crises. I consider which issues have prompted meaningful reforms and which have yet to result in significant progress. Finally, I reflect on the extent that the incentives contributed to these crises and argue that a more coordinated approach to scientific research is needed to prevent these concerns from resurfacing in a future third crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"38 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Perceived Economic Inequality to Support for Redistribution: The Role of Meritocracy Perception. 从感知到的经济不平等到对再分配的支持:精英观念的作用。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.1013
Lope Tejero-Peregrina, Guillermo Willis, Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez, Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
{"title":"From Perceived Economic Inequality to Support for Redistribution: The Role of Meritocracy Perception.","authors":"Lope Tejero-Peregrina, Guillermo Willis, Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez, Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón","doi":"10.5334/irsp.1013","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.1013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Economic inequality negatively impacts the welfare in our societies, yet there is reluctance to support measures aimed at alleviating its effects. To enhance our comprehension of how inequality influences support for redistribution, this paper investigates the mediating role of descriptive meritocracy (i.e., the degree to which meritocracy is perceived to exist in society). Using a cross-sectional study (N = 1536) and a follow-up experimental-causal-chain design in two subsequent experiments (N = 530), we show that the perception of inequality leads to the perception that society is not meritocratic, which, in turn, promotes support for redistribution. These results underscore the significance of perceiving economic inequality in order to dismantle the normative meritocratic narratives that hinder its reduction. We discuss these findings as part of the effects of economic inequality on the normative climate that influences our individual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"38 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372799/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novelty, Consistency, Transparency: The Trilemma of Psychological Sciences and its Consequences on Open Science Practices. 新颖性、一致性、透明度:心理科学的三难困境及其对开放科学实践的影响。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.979
Paul Bertin, Kenzo Nera
{"title":"Novelty, Consistency, Transparency: The Trilemma of Psychological Sciences and its Consequences on Open Science Practices.","authors":"Paul Bertin, Kenzo Nera","doi":"10.5334/irsp.979","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.979","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The past decade has emphasised the importance of transparency for robust psychological research. However, transparent research has a cost, and it is hardly compatible with both conceptual novelty and statistical consistency across multiple studies. We propose that these three criteria can be conceptualized as a trilemma: fulfilling two of them considerably reduces the probability of satisfying the third one. An article testing a novel idea and transparently reporting evidence is likely to include empirical failure that impede consistency. An article transparently reporting consistent findings probably will acknowledge a replication effort that does not seek theoretical advances. Finally, an article presenting consistent evidence through multiple studies for a novel idea is not likely to be transparent. At a practical level, we argue that the pressure of the trilemma poses a threat for transparency, which is less tangible and historically important in the evaluation of research articles than the two other criteria. While the open science movement grows in importance, the pressure of the trilemma may encourage an opportunistic use of open science practices as a form of virtue signalling compensating for low transparency. Stakeholders, from editors to reviewers, should be aware of the constraints posed by transparency to continue improving the robustness of psychological science and avoiding a deleterious use of open science practices. We review potential solutions to break the pressure of the trilemma.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"38 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372658/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145066019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying with a Classically Liberal Nation: A Social Justice Perspective on Majority Opposition to Multiculturalism. 认同古典自由主义国家:多数人反对多元文化主义的社会正义视角。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.941
Jessica Gale, Antoine Roblain, Christian Staerklé
{"title":"Identifying with a Classically Liberal Nation: A Social Justice Perspective on Majority Opposition to Multiculturalism.","authors":"Jessica Gale, Antoine Roblain, Christian Staerklé","doi":"10.5334/irsp.941","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opposition to multiculturalism is common among native majorities. Normatively, this group-based political theory and public policy has been described as being incompatible with the individual justice-based orientation of Western liberal societies. In this research, we account for national majority opposition to multiculturalism by arguing that national identities in classically liberal societies are primarily associated with individual justice beliefs, in opposition to group-based justice beliefs. A correlational (<i>N</i> = 91) and an experimental (<i>N</i> = 172) study in Switzerland first show that the relationship between national identification and opposition to multiculturalism is partially explained by a belief in individual responsibility, a key facet of individual justice. This result was replicated using representative Swiss data from the World Values Survey (<i>N</i> = 1241), as well as in Belgium (<i>N</i> = 362), another Western liberal society. Effects transcended an ethnic conception of national identity and provide a novel perspective on majority multicultural attitudes as rooted in group-based conceptions of social justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"38 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372792/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145066003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Stereotype Threat Influences Cognitive Performance: It All Depends on How You Feel! 刻板印象威胁如何影响认知表现:这完全取决于你的感受!
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.976
Saša Drače, Verda Dolarević, Elma Šašić
{"title":"How Stereotype Threat Influences Cognitive Performance: It All Depends on How You Feel!","authors":"Saša Drače, Verda Dolarević, Elma Šašić","doi":"10.5334/irsp.976","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.976","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have shown that mood could be used as diagnostic information for the assessment of situational demands and that, as such, it can regulate resource mobilization. Accordingly, it was found that negative mood causes overestimation of situational demands, which then leads to effort exertion during performance on easy tasks but disengagement on difficult tasks. The present research investigated whether this mood-motivation relation could be extended to specific emotions to explain the effect of stereotype threat (ST). In order to answer this question, the participants in the standard (fear-based) ST and the no-ST conditions had to perform easy (Study 1) or difficult (Study 2) cognitive tasks. To further explore the hypothetical role of threat-related emotions in each study we introduced another condition in which participants under ST were induced to feel anger (i.e., an emotion theoretically characterized by the perception of low situational demands). Although both ST conditions consistently showed greater stereotype-related concerns compared with the control (no-ST) group, the expected increase in easy task performance (Study 1) and decrease in difficult task performance (Study 2) were observed only in the standard (fear-based) ST condition, but not when participants under ST experienced anger. Our findings suggest that specific emotions emerging under ST could govern motivational processes and account for the effect of ST. Accordingly, the way that individuals appraise ST may have an important impact on task performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"38 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372774/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145066013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two Sides of the Same Coin: How to Integrate Social Network Analysis and Topic Detection to Investigate Shared Contents and Communicative Interactions in Social Representations. 同一枚硬币的两面:如何整合社会网络分析和话题检测来研究社会表征中的共享内容和交际互动。
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.973
Valentina Rizzoli, Anderson da Silveira, Mirella De Falco, Mauro Sarrica
{"title":"Two Sides of the Same Coin: How to Integrate Social Network Analysis and Topic Detection to Investigate Shared Contents and Communicative Interactions in Social Representations.","authors":"Valentina Rizzoli, Anderson da Silveira, Mirella De Falco, Mauro Sarrica","doi":"10.5334/irsp.973","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper advances the integration of Social Network Analysis (SNA) and topic detection into the study of Social Representations (SRs). We suggest that a combination of the two analyses helps to detect communities characterised by shared contents and/or social interactions, the two facets that make representations 'social'. Building on Moliner's (2023) proposal we present a step-by-step approach to combine the identification of shared meanings based on lexicometric analysis and identification of social interaction based on social network analysis techniques. To illustrate our proposal, we use a dataset of 396 Brazilian tweets about the Covid-19 pandemic that was collected to investigate the SR of science during the pandemic. The Reinert method was run on the corpus using the Iramuteq R interface and a bipartite network analysis was performed using Gephi software. We thus operationalised 615 users and six topics as nodes, while shared topics and interactions (883 mentions) as arcs. This allowed us to examine both the content of social representations and interactions among different individuals and communities. In our case, the results highlight shared content as the main determinant for community formation; however, some users appear to have linked different communities together: they are associated to a community not because of the topic they share, but because of their interactions with other users. We contend this methodology proves to be a fruitful theoretical-methodological link between SNA and SR theory, as it detects both facets of the relationship between SRs and groups: the shared contents and the communicative interactions between individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"37 ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372803/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do People Believe They Are Less Predictable Than Others? Three Replications of Pronin and Kugler's (2010) Experiment 1. 人们认为自己比别人更难预测吗?Pronin和Kugler(2010)实验的三个重复
IF 1.6 4区 心理学
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.5334/irsp.946
Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Stephanie Permut, Hallgeir Sjåstad, Chelsea Chi Wing Lo, Yong Jun Kueh, Emily Sihui Zhong, Kai Hin Wan, Kai Yi Kelly Choy, Man Chung Wong, Stanley Wei Jian Hugh, Khan Tahira, Bo Ley Cheng, Gilad Feldman
{"title":"Do People Believe They Are Less Predictable Than Others? Three Replications of Pronin and Kugler's (2010) Experiment 1.","authors":"Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Stephanie Permut, Hallgeir Sjåstad, Chelsea Chi Wing Lo, Yong Jun Kueh, Emily Sihui Zhong, Kai Hin Wan, Kai Yi Kelly Choy, Man Chung Wong, Stanley Wei Jian Hugh, Khan Tahira, Bo Ley Cheng, Gilad Feldman","doi":"10.5334/irsp.946","DOIUrl":"10.5334/irsp.946","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pronin and Kugler (2010) proposed that people believe they have more free will than others. In their Experiment 1 they showed that US students evaluated their own decisions and life events as less predictable than similar decisions and life events of close others, presumably suggesting higher free will attributions. We conducted three pre-registered replications of this study, one with a Hong Kong undergraduate sample (<i>N</i> = 47) and two online samples from the USA (MTurk using CloudResearch: <i>N</i> = 126, Prolific: <i>N</i> = 858) (overall <i>N</i> = 1031). In Studies 1a and 1b that mirrored the target article's mixed design (self-other between, past-future within), we found support for the original findings with weaker effects. In Study 2 we contrasted between-subject versus within-subject designs in a single data collection. We successfully replicated the effects with the between-subject design, whereas we failed to find support for the effect using the within-subjects design. This suggests support for the phenomenon in single evaluation mode assessing either the self or the other, but that people correct for the self-other asymmetry in perceived predictability when the judgment is made in joint evaluations mode. Materials, data, and code are available on: https://osf.io/ykmqp/. Open peer review: https://osf.io/d47kj.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"37 ","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372692/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书