Towards an Interdisciplinary Consensual Measure of Social Participation: From Scoping Review to Clustering Measurement.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-02-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/irsp.854
Jessica S Morton, Bernard Rimé, Ginette Herman, David Bourguignon, Olivier Luminet
{"title":"Towards an Interdisciplinary Consensual Measure of Social Participation: From Scoping Review to Clustering Measurement.","authors":"Jessica S Morton, Bernard Rimé, Ginette Herman, David Bourguignon, Olivier Luminet","doi":"10.5334/irsp.854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the current interest in social participation, this article focuses on existing measures that (1) include the four dimensions of formal social participation - breadth, intensity, duration, and engagement - identified by Bohnert et al. (2010) and (2) can be used in large-scale surveys. In Study 1, a scoping review conducted on three databases (PsychTest, PsychInfo, Sociological abstracts) identified 99 articles that included at least one measure of formal social participation. No measure met our two requirements. We therefore decided to design a new measure, which included an index based on six items to assess the four dimensions of the construct. Using clustering techniques, Study 2 identified social participation profiles based on the responses of 4,160 participants. Five clusters of social participation emerged: (0) absence, (1) passive, (2) low active, (3) medium active and (4) high active. Study 3 replicated these findings with a new sample (n = 3,956), thereby supporting the quality and replicability of the social participation measure by clustering. Coded as an ordinal categorical variable, the score lends itself to statistical analyses commonly performed on large-scale survey data. In this way, the Social Participation Index could meet the need for a standard tool that can be used in a multidisciplinary way.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"37 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the current interest in social participation, this article focuses on existing measures that (1) include the four dimensions of formal social participation - breadth, intensity, duration, and engagement - identified by Bohnert et al. (2010) and (2) can be used in large-scale surveys. In Study 1, a scoping review conducted on three databases (PsychTest, PsychInfo, Sociological abstracts) identified 99 articles that included at least one measure of formal social participation. No measure met our two requirements. We therefore decided to design a new measure, which included an index based on six items to assess the four dimensions of the construct. Using clustering techniques, Study 2 identified social participation profiles based on the responses of 4,160 participants. Five clusters of social participation emerged: (0) absence, (1) passive, (2) low active, (3) medium active and (4) high active. Study 3 replicated these findings with a new sample (n = 3,956), thereby supporting the quality and replicability of the social participation measure by clustering. Coded as an ordinal categorical variable, the score lends itself to statistical analyses commonly performed on large-scale survey data. In this way, the Social Participation Index could meet the need for a standard tool that can be used in a multidisciplinary way.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社会参与的跨学科共识测量:从范围评估到聚类测量。
鉴于目前人们对社会参与的兴趣,本文将重点关注现有的测量方法:(1)包括Bohnert等人(2010)确定的正式社会参与的四个维度——广度、强度、持续时间和参与度;(2)可用于大规模调查。在研究1中,对三个数据库(PsychTest, PsychInfo, Sociological abstracts)进行了范围审查,确定了99篇至少包含一种正式社会参与测量的文章。没有办法满足我们的两个要求。因此,我们决定设计一种新的测量方法,其中包括一个基于六个项目的指数,以评估构建的四个维度。利用聚类技术,研究2根据4160名参与者的回答确定了社会参与概况。出现了五种社会参与类型:(0)缺席、(1)被动、(2)低主动、(3)中等主动和(4)高主动。研究3用一个新的样本(n = 3956)重复了这些发现,从而通过聚类支持社会参与测量的质量和可复制性。作为一个有序的分类变量编码,分数适合于通常在大规模调查数据上执行的统计分析。这样,社会参与指数就可以满足人们对一种可以多学科方式使用的标准工具的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Review of Social Psychology (IRSP) is supported by the Association pour la Diffusion de la Recherche Internationale en Psychologie Sociale (A.D.R.I.P.S.). The International Review of Social Psychology publishes empirical research and theoretical notes in all areas of social psychology. Articles are written preferably in English but can also be written in French. The journal was created to reflect research advances in a field where theoretical and fundamental questions inevitably convey social significance and implications. It emphasizes scientific quality of its publications in every area of social psychology. Any kind of research can be considered, as long as the results significantly enhance the understanding of a general social psychological phenomenon and the methodology is appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信