我能为您做些什么?情境和敌意性别歧视对会话主体适当性别感知的影响。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
International Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2023-07-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/irsp.669
Mathieu Pinelli, Elisa Sarda, Clémentine Bry
{"title":"我能为您做些什么?情境和敌意性别歧视对会话主体适当性别感知的影响。","authors":"Mathieu Pinelli, Elisa Sarda, Clémentine Bry","doi":"10.5334/irsp.669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conversational agents (CAs) are increasingly being developed on commercial websites nowadays. We tested in two studies whether gender stereotypes apply to non-gendered CAs. In the first study, participants evaluated whether CAs are expected to display more masculine or feminine characteristics in situations designed to be stereotypically male or female. The sexist attitudes of the respondents were also measured. As predicted, participants perceived that a CA should be more masculine in stereotypically male situations and more feminine in stereotypically female situations. Moreover, we found that hostile sexism but not benevolent sexism moderated the effect of the gendered situation. The second study replicated the results while addressing the limits of Study 1, showing the robustness of these effects. These findings are consistent with models of gender stereotypes in humans and robots and show for the first time a moderation effect of (hostile) sexism in a customer service context with CAs. The processes involved in human relationships seem relevant in a digital environment that involves CAs. Researchers and professionals should work together to avoid reproducing and perpetuating gender stereotypes when developing CAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can I Help You? The Influence of Situation and Hostile Sexism on Perception of Appropriate Gender of Conversational Agents.\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Pinelli, Elisa Sarda, Clémentine Bry\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/irsp.669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Conversational agents (CAs) are increasingly being developed on commercial websites nowadays. We tested in two studies whether gender stereotypes apply to non-gendered CAs. In the first study, participants evaluated whether CAs are expected to display more masculine or feminine characteristics in situations designed to be stereotypically male or female. The sexist attitudes of the respondents were also measured. As predicted, participants perceived that a CA should be more masculine in stereotypically male situations and more feminine in stereotypically female situations. Moreover, we found that hostile sexism but not benevolent sexism moderated the effect of the gendered situation. The second study replicated the results while addressing the limits of Study 1, showing the robustness of these effects. These findings are consistent with models of gender stereotypes in humans and robots and show for the first time a moderation effect of (hostile) sexism in a customer service context with CAs. The processes involved in human relationships seem relevant in a digital environment that involves CAs. Researchers and professionals should work together to avoid reproducing and perpetuating gender stereotypes when developing CAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372706/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.669\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

会话代理(ca)在商业网站上得到了越来越多的发展。我们在两项研究中测试了性别刻板印象是否适用于非性别ca。在第一项研究中,参与者评估了在设计为男性或女性的刻板印象的情况下,ca是应该表现出更男性化还是更女性化的特征。调查还测量了受访者的性别歧视态度。正如预测的那样,参与者认为CA应该在刻板的男性情境中更男性化,在刻板的女性情境中更女性化。此外,我们发现敌意性别歧视对性别情境的影响有调节作用,而善意性别歧视对性别情境的影响没有调节作用。第二项研究重复了研究1的结果,同时解决了研究1的局限性,显示了这些效应的稳健性。这些发现与人类和机器人的性别刻板印象模型一致,并首次显示了(敌意)性别歧视在客户服务环境中的调节作用。人际关系中涉及的过程似乎与涉及ca的数字环境相关。研究人员和专业人员应该共同努力,在开发CAs时避免再现和延续性别刻板印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How Can I Help You? The Influence of Situation and Hostile Sexism on Perception of Appropriate Gender of Conversational Agents.

How Can I Help You? The Influence of Situation and Hostile Sexism on Perception of Appropriate Gender of Conversational Agents.

How Can I Help You? The Influence of Situation and Hostile Sexism on Perception of Appropriate Gender of Conversational Agents.

How Can I Help You? The Influence of Situation and Hostile Sexism on Perception of Appropriate Gender of Conversational Agents.

Conversational agents (CAs) are increasingly being developed on commercial websites nowadays. We tested in two studies whether gender stereotypes apply to non-gendered CAs. In the first study, participants evaluated whether CAs are expected to display more masculine or feminine characteristics in situations designed to be stereotypically male or female. The sexist attitudes of the respondents were also measured. As predicted, participants perceived that a CA should be more masculine in stereotypically male situations and more feminine in stereotypically female situations. Moreover, we found that hostile sexism but not benevolent sexism moderated the effect of the gendered situation. The second study replicated the results while addressing the limits of Study 1, showing the robustness of these effects. These findings are consistent with models of gender stereotypes in humans and robots and show for the first time a moderation effect of (hostile) sexism in a customer service context with CAs. The processes involved in human relationships seem relevant in a digital environment that involves CAs. Researchers and professionals should work together to avoid reproducing and perpetuating gender stereotypes when developing CAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Review of Social Psychology (IRSP) is supported by the Association pour la Diffusion de la Recherche Internationale en Psychologie Sociale (A.D.R.I.P.S.). The International Review of Social Psychology publishes empirical research and theoretical notes in all areas of social psychology. Articles are written preferably in English but can also be written in French. The journal was created to reflect research advances in a field where theoretical and fundamental questions inevitably convey social significance and implications. It emphasizes scientific quality of its publications in every area of social psychology. Any kind of research can be considered, as long as the results significantly enhance the understanding of a general social psychological phenomenon and the methodology is appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信