Journal of the Philosophy of History最新文献_第2页

On the Function and Nature of Historical Counterfactuals. Clarifying Confusions 论历史反事实的功能和性质。澄清混淆

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341519

Veli Virmajoki

引用次数: 0

Idea or Concept?: Progress in Comparative Methodological Perspective 理念还是概念？比较方法论视角下的进步

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341508

Tyson Retz

{"title":"Idea or Concept?: Progress in Comparative Methodological Perspective","authors":"Tyson Retz","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341508","url":null,"abstract":"The history of the idea of progress and the history of the concept of progress are two different things, not least because they emanate from considerably different intellectual traditions. In anglophone history of ideas, progress has typically been viewed as a belief. Historians of ideas explore the past evaluating the extent to which a given society met certain conditions of belief. By contrast, in the history of concepts as developed by Reinhart Koselleck, progress has occupied the dual role of a ‘basic concept’ that grasps modern sociopolitical reality and a ‘collective singular’ that aggregates previous and adjacent meanings in the one linguistic unit. This article compares these two historical research programmes, highlights their merits and deficiencies, and concludes by offering a new approach to the history of concepts as suggested by R.G. Collingwood’s theory of a scale of forms. In each of the approaches to the history of ideas and concepts addressed, particular attention is given to the problem of what qualifies as progress, and thus to a longstanding problem concerning the attribution of progress to past societies routinely excluded from its history, including those left out by Koselleck’s conventional secular-modern thesis.","PeriodicalId":43541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139054022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Hont and Koselleck on the Crisis of Authority 洪特和科赛莱克论权力危机

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341506

Lasse S. Andersen

引用次数: 0

The One Big Idea: Koselleck’s Structures of Repetition and Their Historiographical Consequences 一个大概念：科塞勒克的重复结构及其历史学后果

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341510

Peter Vogt

{"title":"The One Big Idea: Koselleck’s Structures of Repetition and Their Historiographical Consequences","authors":"Peter Vogt","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341510","url":null,"abstract":"What is the one big idea of Koselleck’s Historik understood as a methodological framework for the attempt to combine a theory of historical times with a theory of historical time? In part (1) of this paper, I criticize the two most basic attempts to understand Koselleck’s one big idea as mistaken because they are exclusively interested either in history (in the singular) or in histories (in the plural) and thus miss the central relevance of structures of repetition (“Wiederholungsstrukturen”) for Koselleck’s Historik. In part (2), I will clarify the rather hidden pre-history, the main ambition, the theoretical context and the substantial content of Koselleck’s concept of structures of repetition in history and language. In part (3), I will discuss four historiographical consequences of Koselleck’s structures of repetition. I will end the paper by observing a remarkable theoretical affinity between Barrington Moore’s search for recurring patterns in the field of sociology and Koselleck’s structures of repetition in history and language. Moore’s work illustrates the historiographical potential of the one big idea of Koselleck’s Historik better than any other work I am aware of.","PeriodicalId":43541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139053960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Koselleck and the Problem of Historical Judgment 科塞勒克与历史判断问题

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341507

Zachary Riebeling

引用次数: 0

Experience versus Recollection: Reinhart Koselleck and Aleida Assmann on Collective Memory 经验与回忆：莱因哈特-科塞勒克和阿莱达-阿斯曼论集体记忆

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341511

Jan Ferdinand

引用次数: 0

Frege and the Logic of the Historical Proposition 弗雷格与历史命题的逻辑

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341505

Luke O’Sullivan

{"title":"Frege and the Logic of the Historical Proposition","authors":"Luke O’Sullivan","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341505","url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that history played a larger role in the thought of Gottlob Frege than has usually been acknowledged. Frege’s logical writings frequently employed statements about the past as examples that included references to historical persons. Frege also described history as a science and argued that historical propositions could support valid inferences and reliably identify historical persons and events. But Frege’s eternalist theory of reference, designed primarily for formal concepts and objects, struggled to accommodate such propositions. Identifying an objective referent for the subjectivity of historical actors was particularly problematic. The article suggests that Frege’s writings are interesting for the philosopher of history for at least two reasons: first, his work is clarificatory when considering the key features that historical propositions must have to count as objective knowledge, and second, it foreshadowed the issues with historicity that analytical philosophy experienced in the twentieth century. It concludes that the problems Frege raised exposed the need for a new concept of inter-subjectivity to replace his own Platonic foundation for objectivity.","PeriodicalId":43541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","volume":"39 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138506074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Narratives, Events & Monotremes: The Philosophy of History in Practice 叙事、事件与单线:实践中的历史哲学

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341500

Adrian Currie

引用次数: 0

Thinking about Past Minds: Cognitive Science as Philosophy of Historiography 思考过去的心灵:作为史学哲学的认知科学

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341498

Adam Michael Bricker

{"title":"Thinking about Past Minds: Cognitive Science as Philosophy of Historiography","authors":"Adam Michael Bricker","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341498","url":null,"abstract":"This paper outlines the case for a future research program that uses the tools of experimental cognitive science to investigate questions that traditionally fall under the remit of the philosophy of historiography. The central idea is this – the epistemic profile of historians’ representations of the past is largely an empirical matter, determined in no small part by the cognitive processes that produce these representations. However, as the philosophy of historiography is not presently equipped to investigate such cognitive questions, legitimate concerns about evidential quality go largely overlooked. The case of mental state representation provides an excellent illustration of this. Representations of past mental states – the thoughts and fears and knowledge and desires of past agents – play much the same evidential role in historiography as in everyday life, serving in the causal explanation of agents’ behaviors and supporting normative evaluation of those behaviors. However, we have good reason to suspect that the theory of mind processes that support these representations may be more susceptible to error when deployed in the context of historiography than under everyday conditions. This raises worries about the quality of evidence that theory of mind can provide historiography, worries which require experimental cognitive science to properly address.","PeriodicalId":43541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","volume":"39 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138506072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Pre-Narrativist Philosophy of History 前叙事主义历史哲学

IF 0.5 3区历史学

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341497

Jonas Ahlskog

引用次数: 0