Hont and Koselleck on the Crisis of Authority

IF 0.4 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1163/18722636-12341506

Lasse S. Andersen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the reception of Reinhart Koselleck’s Kritik und Krise by the intellectual historian István Hont. Relying on hitherto unpublished manuscripts, it argues that the later work of Hont can be seen as a critical response to Koselleck and his characterisation of the crisis of modern politics as a crisis of political authority.

查看原文本刊更多论文

洪特和科赛莱克论权力危机

本文探讨了知识史学家伊什特万-洪特（István Hont）对莱因哈特-科塞勒克（Reinhart Koselleck）的《批判与危机》（Kritik und Krise）的接受情况。根据迄今为止尚未发表的手稿，本文认为，洪特的后期作品可视为对科塞勒克及其将现代政治危机描述为政治权威危机的批判性回应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the Philosophy of History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy of history is a rapidly expanding area. There is growing interest today in: what constitutes knowledge of the past, the ontology of past events, the relationship of language to the past, and the nature of representations of the past. These interests are distinct from – although connected with – contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, metaphysics, philosophy of language, and aesthetics. Hence we need a distinct venue in which philosophers can explore these issues. Journal of the Philosophy of History provides such a venue. Ever since neo-Kantianism, philosophy of history has been central to all of philosophy, whether or not particular philosophers recognized its potential significance.