发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Argumentation in Context最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style 调解员作为和解辩论风格的构成要素的重构
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.20019.gre
S. Greco, Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
{"title":"Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style","authors":"S. Greco, Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20019.gre","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20019.gre","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper shows that reframing of conflict can be considered as a constitutive element of a “reconciliatory argumentative\u0000 style” (van Eemeren, 2019), which is typical of dispute mediators, whose aim is to steer parties\u0000 towards the resolution of their conflict. On the basis of a systematic empirical analysis of mediation cases, we first show that reframing\u0000 encompasses a change of issue, which may or may not be justified by arguments. Then, we show how it is functional to the three aspects of\u0000 mediators’ strategic manoeuvring, being used consistently by mediators in their effort to help parties solve their conflict on the basis of\u0000 reasonable discussion.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47365372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Characteristics of a detached argumentative style in public policy analysis 公共政策分析中超然辩论风格的特征
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.20023.gat
A. Gâţă
{"title":"Characteristics of a detached argumentative style in public policy analysis","authors":"A. Gâţă","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20023.gat","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20023.gat","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This study is a contribution to the recently introduced notion of argumentative style (van Eemeren 2019) in the framework of the pragma-dialectical approach. It aims at characterizing a detached argumentative style,\u0000 by focusing on a speech event pertaining to the communicative activity type organizational discourse, a report on EU environment and climate\u0000 change policies. The analysis concerns the executive summary and the key findings of the report, reconstructed in the analysis as the\u0000 concluding stage of the critical discussion corresponding to the pragma-dialectical model. The notion of text type (Adam 1992) used in the analysis has allowed a more fine-grained characterization of the detached argumentative style,\u0000 especially since the communicative practice under analysis displays a specific discourse format and structure for reasons of\u0000 conventionalization and institutionalization. In such circumstances, determined by the type of conventionalization imposed by the context,\u0000 the adoption of a detached argumentative style appears to be a pre-requisite. In the concluding stage of a critical discussion the\u0000 difference of opinion is not restated, while the most significant standpoints are synthetically (re)presented by an adequate balance of\u0000 narrative, descriptive and metadiscursive text strategies meant to support the objectivity, the conciseness of the presentation and also\u0000 ensuring the necessary density of information required in a report summary or the presentation of key findings, respectively. While explicit\u0000 negative evaluations or formulations of standpoints are avoided, the recommendations are presented as open to adoption or reconsideration by\u0000 policymakers.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47051183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Six related essays on argumentative style 六篇议论文
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.20021.eem
F. H. Eemeren
{"title":"Six related essays on argumentative style","authors":"F. H. Eemeren","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20021.eem","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20021.eem","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This introduction to the special issue devoted to argumentative style describes the way in which this collection of six\u0000 papers came about. It recapitulates the main thrust of the issues that are included. All authors share the pragma-dialectical perspective on\u0000 argumentative style set forth in the first contribution, in which argumentative style is connected with strategic manoeuvring. In analysing\u0000 argumentative styles, they concentrate on different kinds of argumentative discourses and have a different emphasis in carrying out their\u0000 analyses.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41335349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs 中国外交部发言人在例行记者会上的不妥协的对抗性辩论风格
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.20026.pen
Wu Peng
{"title":"The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of\u0000 China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs","authors":"Wu Peng","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20026.pen","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20026.pen","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 According to van Eemeren’s expose about the theoretical notion “argumentative style” (2019: 153–171), each of the four stages of an argumentative exchange in a certain institutional context can have its own\u0000 argumentative style, but all of them may well belong to the same general category (for instance, “detached” or “engaged”). As the start of a\u0000 broad project investigating argumentative styles used in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of\u0000 China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this paper focuses on the uncompromising confrontational style prototypically used by the spokespersons\u0000 in responding to journalists, which is characterized by argumentative moves instrumental in strategies of silencing the other party,\u0000 distracting the other party, and pressuring the other party. By means of an analysis of three argumentative replies given by Chinese\u0000 spokespersons, this paper shows how this particular confrontational style takes shape and facilitates the spokespersons’ confrontational\u0000 maneuvering by being at the same time detached.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47701138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style 维尔德斯民粹主义议论文风格的表象维度
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.20020.jan
H. Jansen, M. V. Leeuwen
{"title":"The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style","authors":"H. Jansen, M. V. Leeuwen","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20020.jan","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20020.jan","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This study responds to van Eemeren’s (2019, 2021) call for research on the prototypical argumentative styles used in particular domains or\u0000 communicative activity types by particular individuals or groups. It explores the argumentative style of Dutch politician Geert\u0000 Wilders in presenting populist arguments, i.e., arguments claiming that if many people hold a certain standpoint, this standpoint\u0000 should be accepted. A corpus study of 27 texts taken from the website of Wilders’s political party reveals four characteristics of\u0000 this presentation that deviate significantly from the general descriptions of this type of argument given in the textbooks: (1) absence of indicators, (2) implicit standpoint, (3) wide range of verbs to indicate what “the people” think or believe, (4) use of\u0000 a construction indicating that the speaker is acting as a mouthpiece (“on behalf of the people, I say”).","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45759635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style 论论辩风格与语言风格的关系
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-02-04 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.20014.haa
T. V. Haaften, M. V. Leeuwen
{"title":"On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style","authors":"T. V. Haaften, M. V. Leeuwen","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20014.haa","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20014.haa","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Argumentative style is assumed to be instrumental to the implementation of an arguer’s strategic plan to resolve a\u0000 difference of opinion in his/her favor. One important constitutive element of argumentative style are linguistic choices. It is\u0000 therefore crucial to pay close and systematic attention to linguistic choices and their argumentative functions in the analysis of\u0000 argumentative style.\u0000 In this paper we discuss how a linguistic-stylistic analysis can be conducted systematically by making use of\u0000 methodological insights from the so-called “linguistic-stylistic approach”, and how such an analysis can be integrated with a\u0000 pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative discourse. Our aim is to show how such an integration could be helpful in analysing\u0000 the presentational aspect of an argumentative style, and how the outcomes of such an analysis could be linked to another aspect of\u0000 argumentative style, namely the strategic considerations implemented in the argumentative discourse and more particularly the\u0000 argumentative strategies involved.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41811509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Argumentative Style 好辩的风格
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-02-04 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.10.1
Frans H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, S. Greco, Ton van Haaften, Nanon H. M. Labrie, F. Leal, Peng Wu
{"title":"Argumentative Style","authors":"Frans H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, S. Greco, Ton van Haaften, Nanon H. M. Labrie, F. Leal, Peng Wu","doi":"10.1075/jaic.10.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.10.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49064150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Deliberating over legislative ends 审议立法目的
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2020-12-17 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.19010.ihn
Constanza Ihnen Jory
{"title":"Deliberating over legislative ends","authors":"Constanza Ihnen Jory","doi":"10.1075/jaic.19010.ihn","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.19010.ihn","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper outlines a non-exhaustive inventory of presumptive argument schemes that can be used by legislators to\u0000 rationally argue for and against the legitimacy of legislative ends. The inventory has both a descriptive and normative dimension. The\u0000 inventory is descriptive because it is partly based on the empirical observation of arguments actually used by legislators in a sample of\u0000 lawmaking debates. However, the inventory is also normative because – as I shall argue in this paper – the schemes identified in the sample\u0000 are presumptive arguments schemes. They are therefore schemes with a claim to rationality, provided that certain conditions are met. The\u0000 schemes included in the inventory are: the scheme of instrumental argumentation, the scheme from unintended consequences, the scheme from\u0000 values, the schemes from model and antimodel, and the schemes from social demand.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"58700324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Economic consequences for lawyers 律师的经济后果
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2020-12-17 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.19013.esp
F. Esposito, Giovanni Tuzet
{"title":"Economic consequences for lawyers","authors":"F. Esposito, Giovanni Tuzet","doi":"10.1075/jaic.19013.esp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.19013.esp","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article moves from the premise that a bilateral relationship between law and economics requires the contribution of\u0000 the theory of legal argumentation. The article shows that, to be legally relevant, economic consequences have to be incorporated into\u0000 interpretive arguments. In this regard, the jurisprudential preface strategy proposed by Craswell goes in the right direction, but begs the\u0000 question of why the legally relevant consequences have to be assessed in terms of total welfare maximization instead of, in the EU context\u0000 at least, consumer welfare maximization. After having identified five points of divergence between total and consumer welfare approaches,\u0000 the article draws from legal inferentialism to propose an analytical tool – the explanatory scorekeeping model – for assessing the\u0000 explanatory power of these two approaches. The model is then applied to the reasoning in United Brands Company v.\u0000 Commission.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44934228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
“The people want it” “人民想要它”
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.17028.jan
H. Jansen
{"title":"“The people want it”","authors":"H. Jansen","doi":"10.1075/jaic.17028.jan","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17028.jan","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article reflects on the reasonableness of populist arguments supporting a prescriptive standpoint in the context of\u0000 deliberation (which I call ‘deliberative’ populist arguments). A literature survey shows a divide between authors who claim that populist\u0000 arguments are always fallacious and those who think that in some situations they can be reasonable, including the context of political\u0000 deliberation. It is then argued that deliberative populist arguments are based on a linking premise that appeals to majority opinion as a\u0000 principle of democracy. This linking premise differs from the one underlying the traditional interpretation of a fallacious populist\u0000 argument (argumentum ad populum) and appears at first sight to make the argument reasonable. However, I conclude that a\u0000 deliberative populist argument is also unreasonable, because it acts merely as a trump card, creating a false impression about democracy and\u0000 avoiding engagement in real debate and substantive reasons.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46219113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信