Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI:10.1075/jaic.20019.gre

S. Greco, Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria

引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper shows that reframing of conflict can be considered as a constitutive element of a “reconciliatory argumentative style” (van Eemeren, 2019), which is typical of dispute mediators, whose aim is to steer parties towards the resolution of their conflict. On the basis of a systematic empirical analysis of mediation cases, we first show that reframing encompasses a change of issue, which may or may not be justified by arguments. Then, we show how it is functional to the three aspects of mediators’ strategic manoeuvring, being used consistently by mediators in their effort to help parties solve their conflict on the basis of reasonable discussion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

调解员作为和解辩论风格的构成要素的重构

本文表明，冲突的重构可以被视为“和解辩论风格”的构成要素(van Eemeren, 2019)，这是争议调解员的典型特征，其目的是引导各方解决冲突。在对调解案例进行系统实证分析的基础上，我们首先表明，重构包含了问题的变化，这可能会或可能不会被论证所证明。然后，我们展示了它如何对调解员战略操作的三个方面起作用，调解员在努力帮助各方在合理讨论的基础上解决冲突时始终使用它。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Argumentation in Context COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.