发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Argumentation in Context最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām 奥斯曼论证理论的认识论取向及其与卡拉姆的关系
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22021.inc
Serkan Ince
{"title":"The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām","authors":"Serkan Ince","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22021.inc","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22021.inc","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories provide strong evidence that the argumentation theory advocated by\u0000 Ottoman theorists was epistemologically oriented, and has strong parallels with the argumentation theory of kalām\u0000 (dialectical theology); indeed Ottoman argumentation theory and kalām interacted intensively and influenced each\u0000 other. This article traces some snapshots of this discourse. In doing so, key concepts of Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories\u0000 are introduced.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138997659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Covid-19 and public debate over gain-of-function research on potentially pandemic pathogens Covid-19 和关于潜在流行病原体功能增益研究的公开辩论
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.00020.mit
Gordon R. Mitchell
{"title":"Covid-19 and public debate over gain-of-function research on\u0000 potentially pandemic pathogens","authors":"Gordon R. Mitchell","doi":"10.1075/jaic.00020.mit","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00020.mit","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Controversial “gain-of-function” research (GoFR) aims to improve\u0000 understanding of human health by studying behavior of genetically altered\u0000 viruses in laboratory experiments. GoFR proponents tout its potential to support\u0000 public health disease surveillance, drug development and vaccine innovation,\u0000 while skeptics warn that unplanned laboratory release of genetically altered\u0000 pathogens could harm millions in pandemics caused by science. Public interest in\u0000 GoFR grew during the Covid-19 pandemic, as theories circulated that SARS-CoV-2\u0000 was the result of GoFR conducted at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology.\u0000 Analysis of a 2015 public debate on GoFR research, reconstructed according to\u0000 pragma-dialectical argumentation theory, sheds light on the increasingly salient\u0000 scientific controversy and contributes to the growing literature on\u0000 argumentation and health.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"2 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139000637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tweeting fallacies 鸣叫谬误
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22023.gas
José Ángel Gascón
{"title":"Tweeting fallacies","authors":"José Ángel Gascón","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22023.gas","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22023.gas","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The fallacy approach to argument pedagogy has been criticized as being overtly critical, theoretically defective and encouraging an adversarial attitude. In order to solve some of those issues, the effects of fallacy teaching on the arguer’s behavior should be studied empirically. Here I present an exploratory study in which I take a look at how accusations of fallacies are made on Twitter. 865 accusations were analyzed according to seven criteria: (1) whether the fallacy is identified, (2) whether it is misidentified, (3) whether the accusation was substantiated, (4) whether the substantiation makes reference to the context, (5) whether the accuser relies on the “taxonomic technique”, (6) whether the accuser relies on a problematic theory, and (7) whether the accuser is willing to discuss the accusation. Both the findings of the study and the reliability of the criteria are discussed.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"5 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138996412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Serafis (2023): Authoritarianism on the front page: Multimodal discourse and argumentation in times of multiple crises in Greece 评论 Serafis (2023)：头版上的专制主义：希腊多重危机时期的多模式话语和论证
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.00021.tse
A. Tseronis
{"title":"Review of Serafis (2023): Authoritarianism on the front page: Multimodal discourse and argumentation in times of multiple crises in Greece","authors":"A. Tseronis","doi":"10.1075/jaic.00021.tse","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00021.tse","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139000023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Wu (2023): Responding to questions at press conferences: Confrontational maneuvering by Chinese spokespersons 审查吴（2023 年）：在新闻发布会上回答问题：中国发言人的对抗策略
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.00022.rei
Menno H. Reijven
{"title":"Review of Wu (2023): Responding to questions at press conferences: Confrontational maneuvering by Chinese spokespersons","authors":"Menno H. Reijven","doi":"10.1075/jaic.00022.rei","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00022.rei","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"109 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138999588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of oral and written argumentation by Ultra-OrthodoxJewish students 极端正统犹太学生口头和书面论证的比较
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22013.tse
Ehud Tsemach
{"title":"Comparison of oral and written argumentation by Ultra-OrthodoxJewish students","authors":"Ehud Tsemach","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22013.tse","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22013.tse","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines the relations between oral and written argumentation in two contexts: written assignments and structured interviews among Ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Jewish students in Israeli higher education. The segregated education system for Haredi students focuses on dyadic oral discussions about religious texts. When Haredi men start their way in academia, they move from an oral to a written culture. To understand this complex process, I compared forty argumentative essays and structured interviews of Ultra-Orthodox students. I identified which argumentative patterns recurred or differed across the two contexts. The comparison elicited complex findings: whereas dialectic patterns of weighing supporting and opposing arguments and counterarguments were prominent in both contexts, sweeping generalizations and firm arguments were found mainly in the essays. The similarity of the argumentative patterns in writing and in the interviews may be explained by the stability of argument schemata across different contexts. The findings expand on previous theoretical and empirical findings and demonstrate how the dialectic process of examining different perspectives leads to complex positions. Finally, I present educational implications for teaching argumentation, such as careful activity design and choosing discussion topics that elicit weighing and sophisticated arguments.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A repugnant possibility 一种令人厌恶的可能性
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22004.gin
Diana Giner
{"title":"A repugnant possibility","authors":"Diana Giner","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22004.gin","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22004.gin","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Commisa v Pemex is one of the rare cases where an arbitral award set aside at the seat of arbitration is enforced. The judges are forced to justify how the notion of public policy becomes a priority over international comity. This paper explores, from a pragma-dialectic approach, what rhetorical strategies are employed to justify this decision. Legal Argumentation Theory ( van Eemeren & Grootendorst, 2004 ; Feteris, 2005 ; van Eemeren, 2007 ; Feteris & Kloosterhuis, 2009 ) values a combination between rational knowledge and rhetoric; for which interpersonality could be highly involved. On the one hand, metaphor ( Lakoff & Turner, 1989 ; Sopory & Dillard, 2002 ; Mussolf, 2017) supports the legal argumentation; while, on the other hand, hedges, intensifiers, attitudinal markers ( Vande Kopple, 1985 ; Crismore, 1993; Hyland, 1999, 2000a; Dafouz, 2003 ) shape the message to convince the audience that, on this occasion, a previously annulled international arbitral award should be enforced.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Argumentation tradition of traders in late antiquity 古代晚期商人的辩论传统
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22003.sch
Andrew Schumann
{"title":"Argumentation tradition of traders in late antiquity","authors":"Andrew Schumann","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22003.sch","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22003.sch","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The institute of legality for traders, including business contracts, business correspondence, and legal proceedings concerning economic cases, appeared in Mesopotamia first since the early dynastic period (ca. 2900–2350 B.C.). This institute became well organized for the period of the third dynasty of Ur (from the 22nd to the 21st century B.C.). This tradition was continued in the Babylonian as well as other Mesopotamian dynasties. As a consequence, Akkadian speaking traders preferred logical tools in their business correspondences, too. Therefore, the business contracts and business correspondence satisfied the main argumentative stages of legal proceedings. In late antiquity since the 2nd century A.D. Greek, Bactrian, and Sogdian were one of the most important languages for traders of Silk Road with very high standards of argumentation as main tools of dispute resolutions taken from the Babylonians. In this paper, I analyze some general features of these standards.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of van Eemeren, Garssen, Greco, van Haaften, Labrie, Leal & Wu (2022): Argumentative Style 回顾 van Eemeren、Garssen、Greco、van Haaften、Labrie、Leal & Wu (2022)：论证风格
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22025.kie
Manfred Kienpointner
{"title":"Review of van Eemeren, Garssen, Greco, van Haaften, Labrie, Leal & Wu (2022): Argumentative Style","authors":"Manfred Kienpointner","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22025.kie","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22025.kie","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Leal & Marraud (2022): How philosophers argue: An adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate 法律审查& &;Marraud(2022):哲学家如何争论:罗素-考普斯顿辩论的对抗性合作
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22014.gas
José Ángel Gascón
{"title":"Review of Leal & Marraud (2022): How philosophers argue: An adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate","authors":"José Ángel Gascón","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22014.gas","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22014.gas","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reviews How philosophers argue: An adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信