奥斯曼论证理论的认识论取向及其与卡拉姆的关系

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1075/jaic.22021.inc

Serkan Ince

{"title":"奥斯曼论证理论的认识论取向及其与卡拉姆的关系","authors":"Serkan Ince","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22021.inc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories provide strong evidence that the argumentation theory advocated by\n Ottoman theorists was epistemologically oriented, and has strong parallels with the argumentation theory of kalām\n (dialectical theology); indeed Ottoman argumentation theory and kalām interacted intensively and influenced each\n other. This article traces some snapshots of this discourse. In doing so, key concepts of Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories\n are introduced.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām\",\"authors\":\"Serkan Ince\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.22021.inc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories provide strong evidence that the argumentation theory advocated by\\n Ottoman theorists was epistemologically oriented, and has strong parallels with the argumentation theory of kalām\\n (dialectical theology); indeed Ottoman argumentation theory and kalām interacted intensively and influenced each\\n other. This article traces some snapshots of this discourse. In doing so, key concepts of Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories\\n are introduced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22021.inc\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22021.inc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

伊斯兰（奥斯曼）论证理论提供了有力的证据，证明奥斯曼理论家所倡导的论证理论是以认识论为导向的，与辩证神学（kalām）的论证理论有很强的相似性；事实上，奥斯曼论证理论与辩证神学（kalām）有着密切的互动和相互影响。本文追溯了这一论述的一些缩影。在此过程中，将介绍伊斯兰（奥斯曼）论证理论的关键概念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām

Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories provide strong evidence that the argumentation theory advocated by Ottoman theorists was epistemologically oriented, and has strong parallels with the argumentation theory of kalām (dialectical theology); indeed Ottoman argumentation theory and kalām interacted intensively and influenced each other. This article traces some snapshots of this discourse. In doing so, key concepts of Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories are introduced.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Argumentation in Context COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.