{"title":"奥斯曼论证理论的认识论取向及其与卡拉姆的关系","authors":"Serkan Ince","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22021.inc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories provide strong evidence that the argumentation theory advocated by\n Ottoman theorists was epistemologically oriented, and has strong parallels with the argumentation theory of kalām\n (dialectical theology); indeed Ottoman argumentation theory and kalām interacted intensively and influenced each\n other. This article traces some snapshots of this discourse. In doing so, key concepts of Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories\n are introduced.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām\",\"authors\":\"Serkan Ince\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.22021.inc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories provide strong evidence that the argumentation theory advocated by\\n Ottoman theorists was epistemologically oriented, and has strong parallels with the argumentation theory of kalām\\n (dialectical theology); indeed Ottoman argumentation theory and kalām interacted intensively and influenced each\\n other. This article traces some snapshots of this discourse. In doing so, key concepts of Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories\\n are introduced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22021.inc\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22021.inc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām
Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories provide strong evidence that the argumentation theory advocated by
Ottoman theorists was epistemologically oriented, and has strong parallels with the argumentation theory of kalām
(dialectical theology); indeed Ottoman argumentation theory and kalām interacted intensively and influenced each
other. This article traces some snapshots of this discourse. In doing so, key concepts of Islamic (Ottoman) argumentation theories
are introduced.