发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Argumentation in Context最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Review of Wu (2023): Responding to questions at press conferences: Confrontational maneuvering by Chinese spokespersons 审查吴（2023 年）：在新闻发布会上回答问题：中国发言人的对抗策略
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.00022.rei
Menno H. Reijven
{"title":"Review of Wu (2023): Responding to questions at press conferences: Confrontational maneuvering by Chinese spokespersons","authors":"Menno H. Reijven","doi":"10.1075/jaic.00022.rei","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00022.rei","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138999588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of oral and written argumentation by Ultra-OrthodoxJewish students 极端正统犹太学生口头和书面论证的比较
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22013.tse
Ehud Tsemach
{"title":"Comparison of oral and written argumentation by Ultra-OrthodoxJewish students","authors":"Ehud Tsemach","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22013.tse","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22013.tse","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines the relations between oral and written argumentation in two contexts: written assignments and structured interviews among Ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Jewish students in Israeli higher education. The segregated education system for Haredi students focuses on dyadic oral discussions about religious texts. When Haredi men start their way in academia, they move from an oral to a written culture. To understand this complex process, I compared forty argumentative essays and structured interviews of Ultra-Orthodox students. I identified which argumentative patterns recurred or differed across the two contexts. The comparison elicited complex findings: whereas dialectic patterns of weighing supporting and opposing arguments and counterarguments were prominent in both contexts, sweeping generalizations and firm arguments were found mainly in the essays. The similarity of the argumentative patterns in writing and in the interviews may be explained by the stability of argument schemata across different contexts. The findings expand on previous theoretical and empirical findings and demonstrate how the dialectic process of examining different perspectives leads to complex positions. Finally, I present educational implications for teaching argumentation, such as careful activity design and choosing discussion topics that elicit weighing and sophisticated arguments.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A repugnant possibility 一种令人厌恶的可能性
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22004.gin
Diana Giner
{"title":"A repugnant possibility","authors":"Diana Giner","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22004.gin","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22004.gin","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Commisa v Pemex is one of the rare cases where an arbitral award set aside at the seat of arbitration is enforced. The judges are forced to justify how the notion of public policy becomes a priority over international comity. This paper explores, from a pragma-dialectic approach, what rhetorical strategies are employed to justify this decision. Legal Argumentation Theory ( van Eemeren & Grootendorst, 2004 ; Feteris, 2005 ; van Eemeren, 2007 ; Feteris & Kloosterhuis, 2009 ) values a combination between rational knowledge and rhetoric; for which interpersonality could be highly involved. On the one hand, metaphor ( Lakoff & Turner, 1989 ; Sopory & Dillard, 2002 ; Mussolf, 2017) supports the legal argumentation; while, on the other hand, hedges, intensifiers, attitudinal markers ( Vande Kopple, 1985 ; Crismore, 1993; Hyland, 1999, 2000a; Dafouz, 2003 ) shape the message to convince the audience that, on this occasion, a previously annulled international arbitral award should be enforced.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Argumentation tradition of traders in late antiquity 古代晚期商人的辩论传统
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22003.sch
Andrew Schumann
{"title":"Argumentation tradition of traders in late antiquity","authors":"Andrew Schumann","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22003.sch","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22003.sch","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The institute of legality for traders, including business contracts, business correspondence, and legal proceedings concerning economic cases, appeared in Mesopotamia first since the early dynastic period (ca. 2900–2350 B.C.). This institute became well organized for the period of the third dynasty of Ur (from the 22nd to the 21st century B.C.). This tradition was continued in the Babylonian as well as other Mesopotamian dynasties. As a consequence, Akkadian speaking traders preferred logical tools in their business correspondences, too. Therefore, the business contracts and business correspondence satisfied the main argumentative stages of legal proceedings. In late antiquity since the 2nd century A.D. Greek, Bactrian, and Sogdian were one of the most important languages for traders of Silk Road with very high standards of argumentation as main tools of dispute resolutions taken from the Babylonians. In this paper, I analyze some general features of these standards.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of van Eemeren, Garssen, Greco, van Haaften, Labrie, Leal & Wu (2022): Argumentative Style 回顾 van Eemeren、Garssen、Greco、van Haaften、Labrie、Leal & Wu (2022)：论证风格
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22025.kie
Manfred Kienpointner
{"title":"Review of van Eemeren, Garssen, Greco, van Haaften, Labrie, Leal & Wu (2022): Argumentative Style","authors":"Manfred Kienpointner","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22025.kie","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22025.kie","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Leal & Marraud (2022): How philosophers argue: An adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate 法律审查& &;Marraud(2022):哲学家如何争论:罗素-考普斯顿辩论的对抗性合作
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22014.gas
José Ángel Gascón
{"title":"Review of Leal & Marraud (2022): How philosophers argue: An adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate","authors":"José Ángel Gascón","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22014.gas","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22014.gas","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reviews How philosophers argue: An adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135435030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cracking the code of Jesus’s parables with argumentation analysis 用论证分析破解耶稣寓言的密码
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-05-09 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22005.thu
Lauri Thurén
{"title":"Cracking the code of Jesus’s parables with argumentation\u0000 analysis","authors":"Lauri Thurén","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22005.thu","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22005.thu","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The teachings of Jesus consist to a great extent of parables.\u0000 There is, however, no unanimity on what each parable means or how it should be\u0000 interpreted. I argue that modern argumentation analysis is the key to\u0000 understanding the parables and their effect on the reading or listening public.\u0000 Irrespective of the length of the parable or the imagery used, the aim of each\u0000 one is to persuade its audience. The parables operate with a common, hidden\u0000 argumentative structure. By cracking this code, one can assess the meaning and\u0000 function of the parables in a reliable way. Example texts discussed and analyzed\u0000 are some crucial parables in Matt. 24–25.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44857852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Argumentation and the interpretation of religious texts 宗教文本的论证与解读
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-05-09 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22006.mac
Fabrizio Macagno, Luciana Salvato
{"title":"Argumentation and the interpretation of religious\u0000 texts","authors":"Fabrizio Macagno, Luciana Salvato","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22006.mac","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22006.mac","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The interpretation of religious texts is an area of research in\u0000 which rhetoric and the use of arguments play a central role. The analysis of the\u0000 persuasive message expressed in many biblical passages, the reconstruction of\u0000 the implicit messages conveyed by the texts, and the justification of an\u0000 interpretation are questions that concern directly argumentation studies.\u0000 The pragmatic dimension of arguments, the instruments developed for bringing to\u0000 light implicit assumptions and conclusions, and the methods for justifying an\u0000 interpretative claim can be important resources for biblical studies and\u0000 applications that can open new research paths. This introduction outlines the\u0000 crossroad between the two fields and the possible directions of future inquiry.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47328523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The appeal to religious authority 对宗教权威的呼吁
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-05-09 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.00018.sal
Luciana Salvato
{"title":"The appeal to religious authority","authors":"Luciana Salvato","doi":"10.1075/jaic.00018.sal","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00018.sal","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper analyzes a particular type of support that religious authorities use in their argumentative monologues\u0000 on moral and theological matters. In particular, the argumentative monologue given by Joseph Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI during\u0000 his 2011 visit to the federal parliament in the Reichstag in Berlin will be used as a case study. In his speech, Ratzinger offers\u0000 his reflections on the foundations of law starting from his interpretation of a brief story from the First Book of the\u0000 Kings in the Old Testament (1 Kings 3:5–10). The entire interpretation assumes the form of an\u0000 argumentative text, in which he appeals to an authoritative voice of German-language jurisprudence (Hans Kelsen) and three\u0000 Christian religious authorities (St Augustine, Origen of Alexandria, and St Paul). The aim of the study is to assess the pragmatic\u0000 strength of Ratzinger’s argumentation and thus verify the authoritative contribution of religious experts in his argumentation, in\u0000 which religion and ethics are linked together.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45162061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The boundaries of lying 说谎的界限
IF 0.8
Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2023-05-09 DOI: 10.1075/jaic.22009.mac
Fabrizio Macagno, G. Damele
{"title":"The boundaries of lying","authors":"Fabrizio Macagno, G. Damele","doi":"10.1075/jaic.22009.mac","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.22009.mac","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The Holy Scriptures can be considered a specific kind of\u0000 normative texts, whose use to assess practical moral cases requires\u0000 interpretation. In the field of ethics, this interpretative problem results in\u0000 the necessity of bridging the gap between the normative source – moral\u0000 precepts – and the specific cases. In the history of the Church, this problem\u0000 was the core of the so-called casuistry, namely the decision-making practice\u0000 consisting in applying the Commandments and other principles of the Holy\u0000 Scriptures to specific cases or moral problems. By taking into account the sin\u0000 of lying, this paper argues that casuistic texts reveal an extremely\u0000 sophisticated interpretative method, grounded on “pragmatic” contextual and\u0000 communicative considerations and argumentative structures that resemble the ones\u0000 used in legal interpretation. These works show how the underspecified biblical\u0000 text expressing an abstract norm was enriched pragmatically by completing it and\u0000 modulating its meaning so that it could be used to draw a conclusion in a\u0000 specific context on a specific case. The mutual interdependence between biblical\u0000 interpretation, pragmatics, and argumentation sheds light on a much broader\u0000 phenomenon, namely the pragmatic nature of argumentation.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48032073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信