{"title":"对宗教权威的呼吁","authors":"Luciana Salvato","doi":"10.1075/jaic.00018.sal","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper analyzes a particular type of support that religious authorities use in their argumentative monologues\n on moral and theological matters. In particular, the argumentative monologue given by Joseph Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI during\n his 2011 visit to the federal parliament in the Reichstag in Berlin will be used as a case study. In his speech, Ratzinger offers\n his reflections on the foundations of law starting from his interpretation of a brief story from the First Book of the\n Kings in the Old Testament (1 Kings 3:5–10). The entire interpretation assumes the form of an\n argumentative text, in which he appeals to an authoritative voice of German-language jurisprudence (Hans Kelsen) and three\n Christian religious authorities (St Augustine, Origen of Alexandria, and St Paul). The aim of the study is to assess the pragmatic\n strength of Ratzinger’s argumentation and thus verify the authoritative contribution of religious experts in his argumentation, in\n which religion and ethics are linked together.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The appeal to religious authority\",\"authors\":\"Luciana Salvato\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.00018.sal\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper analyzes a particular type of support that religious authorities use in their argumentative monologues\\n on moral and theological matters. In particular, the argumentative monologue given by Joseph Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI during\\n his 2011 visit to the federal parliament in the Reichstag in Berlin will be used as a case study. In his speech, Ratzinger offers\\n his reflections on the foundations of law starting from his interpretation of a brief story from the First Book of the\\n Kings in the Old Testament (1 Kings 3:5–10). The entire interpretation assumes the form of an\\n argumentative text, in which he appeals to an authoritative voice of German-language jurisprudence (Hans Kelsen) and three\\n Christian religious authorities (St Augustine, Origen of Alexandria, and St Paul). The aim of the study is to assess the pragmatic\\n strength of Ratzinger’s argumentation and thus verify the authoritative contribution of religious experts in his argumentation, in\\n which religion and ethics are linked together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00018.sal\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00018.sal","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper analyzes a particular type of support that religious authorities use in their argumentative monologues
on moral and theological matters. In particular, the argumentative monologue given by Joseph Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI during
his 2011 visit to the federal parliament in the Reichstag in Berlin will be used as a case study. In his speech, Ratzinger offers
his reflections on the foundations of law starting from his interpretation of a brief story from the First Book of the
Kings in the Old Testament (1 Kings 3:5–10). The entire interpretation assumes the form of an
argumentative text, in which he appeals to an authoritative voice of German-language jurisprudence (Hans Kelsen) and three
Christian religious authorities (St Augustine, Origen of Alexandria, and St Paul). The aim of the study is to assess the pragmatic
strength of Ratzinger’s argumentation and thus verify the authoritative contribution of religious experts in his argumentation, in
which religion and ethics are linked together.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.