中国外交部发言人在例行记者会上的不妥协的对抗性辩论风格

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI:10.1075/jaic.20026.pen

Wu Peng

{"title":"中国外交部发言人在例行记者会上的不妥协的对抗性辩论风格","authors":"Wu Peng","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20026.pen","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n According to van Eemeren’s expose about the theoretical notion “argumentative style” (2019: 153–171), each of the four stages of an argumentative exchange in a certain institutional context can have its own\n argumentative style, but all of them may well belong to the same general category (for instance, “detached” or “engaged”). As the start of a\n broad project investigating argumentative styles used in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of\n China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this paper focuses on the uncompromising confrontational style prototypically used by the spokespersons\n in responding to journalists, which is characterized by argumentative moves instrumental in strategies of silencing the other party,\n distracting the other party, and pressuring the other party. By means of an analysis of three argumentative replies given by Chinese\n spokespersons, this paper shows how this particular confrontational style takes shape and facilitates the spokespersons’ confrontational\n maneuvering by being at the same time detached.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of\\n China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs\",\"authors\":\"Wu Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.20026.pen\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n According to van Eemeren’s expose about the theoretical notion “argumentative style” (2019: 153–171), each of the four stages of an argumentative exchange in a certain institutional context can have its own\\n argumentative style, but all of them may well belong to the same general category (for instance, “detached” or “engaged”). As the start of a\\n broad project investigating argumentative styles used in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of\\n China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this paper focuses on the uncompromising confrontational style prototypically used by the spokespersons\\n in responding to journalists, which is characterized by argumentative moves instrumental in strategies of silencing the other party,\\n distracting the other party, and pressuring the other party. By means of an analysis of three argumentative replies given by Chinese\\n spokespersons, this paper shows how this particular confrontational style takes shape and facilitates the spokespersons’ confrontational\\n maneuvering by being at the same time detached.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20026.pen\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20026.pen","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

根据van Eemeren关于“论证风格”(argumentative style)理论概念的揭露(2019: 153-171)，在一定的制度背景下，论证交流的四个阶段中的每一个阶段都可以有自己的论证风格，但它们都很可能属于同一个一般类别(例如，“超然”或“参与”)。作为调查中国外交部例行新闻发布会上发言人辩论式回答中使用的辩论风格的广泛项目的开始，本文重点研究发言人在回答记者时典型使用的不妥协的对抗性风格，其特点是辩论动作有助于使对方沉默，分散对方注意力，并向对方施压。本文通过对中国发言人三次议论性回答的分析，揭示了这种独特的对抗性风格是如何形成的，同时又以超然的态度促进了发言人的对抗性操作。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs

According to van Eemeren’s expose about the theoretical notion “argumentative style” (2019: 153–171), each of the four stages of an argumentative exchange in a certain institutional context can have its own argumentative style, but all of them may well belong to the same general category (for instance, “detached” or “engaged”). As the start of a broad project investigating argumentative styles used in the spokespersons’ argumentative replies at the regular press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this paper focuses on the uncompromising confrontational style prototypically used by the spokespersons in responding to journalists, which is characterized by argumentative moves instrumental in strategies of silencing the other party, distracting the other party, and pressuring the other party. By means of an analysis of three argumentative replies given by Chinese spokespersons, this paper shows how this particular confrontational style takes shape and facilitates the spokespersons’ confrontational maneuvering by being at the same time detached.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Argumentation in Context COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.