{"title":"六篇议论文","authors":"F. H. Eemeren","doi":"10.1075/jaic.20021.eem","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This introduction to the special issue devoted to argumentative style describes the way in which this collection of six\n papers came about. It recapitulates the main thrust of the issues that are included. All authors share the pragma-dialectical perspective on\n argumentative style set forth in the first contribution, in which argumentative style is connected with strategic manoeuvring. In analysing\n argumentative styles, they concentrate on different kinds of argumentative discourses and have a different emphasis in carrying out their\n analyses.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Six related essays on argumentative style\",\"authors\":\"F. H. Eemeren\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.20021.eem\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This introduction to the special issue devoted to argumentative style describes the way in which this collection of six\\n papers came about. It recapitulates the main thrust of the issues that are included. All authors share the pragma-dialectical perspective on\\n argumentative style set forth in the first contribution, in which argumentative style is connected with strategic manoeuvring. In analysing\\n argumentative styles, they concentrate on different kinds of argumentative discourses and have a different emphasis in carrying out their\\n analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20021.eem\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20021.eem","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
This introduction to the special issue devoted to argumentative style describes the way in which this collection of six
papers came about. It recapitulates the main thrust of the issues that are included. All authors share the pragma-dialectical perspective on
argumentative style set forth in the first contribution, in which argumentative style is connected with strategic manoeuvring. In analysing
argumentative styles, they concentrate on different kinds of argumentative discourses and have a different emphasis in carrying out their
analyses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.