Anuario ThinkEPI最新文献

{"title":"Curar la verdad, curar la mentira: dos estrategias de content curation contra la desinformación","authors":"J. Guallar, Alexandre López-Borrull","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a42","url":null,"abstract":"Two strategies are proposed for dealing with disinformation by using content curation, which we term “curating the truth” and “curating the lie.” The former is the traditional concept of content curation, which seeks to optimize existing content of value. The latter is a curation process linked to supporting the debunking of hoaxes, rumors, and falsehoods. These two strategies are exemplified through four cases of curation posts on Twitter. Various implications are discussed, such as the identification of and access to the sources of hoaxes or the cost of each strategy.\u0000\u0000Resumen\u0000Se plantean dos posibles estrategias ante la desinformación mediante el uso de curación de contenidos, que hemos denominado curar la verdad y curar la mentira. La primera es la concepción tradicional de la curación de contenido, que busca optimizar el contenido de valor existente. La segunda es el proceso de curación vinculado al apoyo o soporte a las verificaciones de bulos, rumores y falsedades. Se ejemplifican las dos estrategias mediante cuatro casos de publicaciones de curación en Twitter. Se discuten algunas implicaciones como la identificación y acceso a las fuentes de los bulos o el coste de las estrategias.","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115363660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Bibliometría sofisticada","authors":"Isidro F. Aguillo","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16e28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16e28","url":null,"abstract":"A call to apply a more sophisticated, professional bibliometrics based on technical and scientific quality metrics that overcomes the current easy though incorrect practices in the evaluation processes of scientific activity.\u0000\u0000Resumen: Una llamada a aplicar una bibliometría más sofisticada, profesional, con métricas de calidad técnica y científica que supere la actual práctica incorrecta y fácil en los procesos de evaluación de la actividad científica.","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123908493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alfabetización informacional crítica: Una corriente política cada vez más necesaria","authors":"Daniel Martínez-Ávila, Aurora Cuevas-Cerveró","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a31","url":null,"abstract":"We are living in a reality in which the practices of access and use of digital information are saturated with disinformation, fake news, and hate speech that are met with no serious repercussions at either the political or the social level. Critical information literacy, as a movement of information activism with theoretical and practical components, is shown to be an opportunity to contribute to the construction of an informed and ethical society. We present an overview of critical information literacy from its origins, focusing on the educational field and professional practice.\u0000\u0000Resumen\u0000Transitamos una realidad obstaculizada por prácticas de acceso y uso de la información digital colmadas de desinformación, noticias falsas y mensajes de odio sobre los que no se actúa con contundencia ni política ni socialmente. La alfabetización informacional crítica, en su vertiente de activismo informacional con componentes teóricos y prácticos, se revela como una oportunidad para colaborar en la construcción de una ciudadanía informada y ética. Presentamos un panorama de la alfabetización informacional crítica desde sus orígenes incidiendo en el ámbito educativo y el ejercicio profesional.","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129229342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Utilización y relevancia de la biblioteca universitaria a partir de las actitudes y prácticas de los jóvenes investigadores","authors":"Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a39","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a39","url":null,"abstract":"We present the results of the Harbinger project, carried out between 2016 and 2022 in several countries on three continents, which focused on the use that early career researchers make of the resources available through university libraries. These include catalogs, databases, and big deals, as well as alternative platforms such as Google search engines, academic social networks (ResearchGate), and pirate platforms (Sci-Hub). Likewise, the project inquires as to the holdings of institutional repositories and the future that these researchers predict for academic libraries. It concludes with the need for libraries to strengthen communication and support for researchers, taking into account in particular the early career researchers who are the future of science.\u0000\u0000\u0000Resumen\u0000Se exponen resultados de los proyectos Harbingers, desarrollados entre 2016 y 2022 en varios países de tres continentes, relativos a la utilización que los investigadores noveles realizan de los recursos disponibles en las bibliotecas universitarias -catálogos, bases de datos y big deals- así como de plataformas alternativas como los motores de búsqueda de Google, las redes sociales académicas –ResearchGate– y las plataformas piratas –Sci-Hub–. Asimismo, se indaga sobre el depósito en los repositorios institucionales y acerca del futuro que estos investigadores predicen para las bibliotecas académicas. Se concluye con la necesidad de que las bibliotecas fortalezcan la comunicación con los investigadores y su apoyo a los mismos, teniendo en cuenta en particular al segmento de investigadores noveles que constituyen el futuro de la ciencia.","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130399120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tribulaciones de Garfield en la selección de fuentes para un índice de citas: “What is a journal? What is a book?”","authors":"Cristóbal Urbano","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a43","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a43","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126671248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ante la reforma del sistema español de evaluación académica: recordando el pasado para no errar en el presente","authors":"E. Delgado-López-Cózar","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a37","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a37","url":null,"abstract":"This essay provides some reflections on the origin of the current scientific evaluation system in Spain, focusing on an analysis of the system of selection and accreditation of university faculty. This system was put in place to prevent academic inbreeding. The thesis that this is mainly a centralized system is rebutted: although accreditation is indeed centralized, faculty selection is carried out by universities themselves. It is argued that we cannot fully trust universities to establish policies that are immune to localism and nepotism if they are not held fully responsible for their actions. The functional imbalance that exists in Spanish university teaching staff is highlighted. Among the activities currently carried out by university professors (teaching, research, knowledge transfer, and management), research is the most highly valued in evaluation programs. More specifically, publications are key to launch and advance careers in the academic environment. The success of the program of sexenios (six-year assessment periods), which serves not only as an incentive for productivity but also as an instrument to establish scientific reputation and academic hierarchy, has contributed to this situation. Other features of the current evaluation system in Spain are the predominance of individual-level evaluation and the use of bibliometric indicators as the final quality values. The Spanish academic evaluation system chose to give preference to individual-level evaluation. Once again, the origin of this approach can be found in the introduction of teacher and researcher productivity salary supplements in 1989. Spanish academics grew up in a culture of individual-level evaluation where they had to obtain their jobs through competitive examinations and were rewarded with bonuses on the basis of personal achievements. Quantitative criteria appeared as the necessary antidotes to curb nepotism. In a country lacking infrastructure and a culture of evaluation, quantitative indicators ensured objectivity and efficiency in the processes of selection and evaluation of publications, and, indirectly, a minimum amount of rigor and relevance of the research itself. The thoughts exposed here are accompanied by suggestions that might help guide the necessary reform of the scientific evaluation system.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000Resumen\u0000Reflexiones sobre el origen del sistema de evaluación científica en España, centrando el análisis en el sistema de selección y acreditación del profesorado universitario. Se recuerda cómo surgió para evitar la endogamia universitaria. Se desmonta la tesis de que estemos ante un sistema centralizado: la acreditación sí lo está, pero la selección del profesorado depende de las universidades. Se defiende que no podemos confiar plenamente en las universidades para que instauren políticas inmunes al localismo y el nepotismo si no se les hace plenamente responsables de sus actos. Se destaca el desequilibrio funcional que existe en el profesorado universitario es","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122003634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Una no tan novedosa perspectiva para enfocar la gestión de la comunicación científica: aplicar los principios de records management al scholarly record","authors":"A. Martín-Martín","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a41","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a41","url":null,"abstract":"An aspect that in my view is insufficiently questioned in conversations about the future of scholarly communication is the framing of academic documents as products of a publishing industry (publications). Here, I propose that documents that serve as evidence of scholarly and scientific activities should be primarily understood as records (elements of an archive), with all that this entails. This is compatible both with the public nature of many of these documents and with the need for editing processes. The result would be a true scholarly record that is worthy of its name, something that could not exist in the past because of technical limitations. This radical shift in perspective reveals the need for academic institutions and communities to take responsibility for the governance of scholarly communication processes, a demand recently voiced by several international organizations and expert groups. The approach outlined here intends to place the management of processes in scholarly communication at the same level as any other human activity that generates documents that are considered necessary to keep supporting said activity. In other areas, responsible organizations apply the principles of records management to appraise and implement the workflows that best support the activities of the organization. This is not the case in scholarly communication, where owing to historical reasons, communication is structured around an industry in which a small number of commercial actors have eventually amassed a disproportionate amount of power, ultimately giving rise to models in which a number of sectors of the academic community are systematically excluded on economic grounds. In summary, this work argues that the digital transformation of scholarly communication points to the need for scholarly records management. Initiatives such as the FAIR principles can be framed as steps in this direction.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000Resumen: Un aspecto a mi parecer no suficientemente cuestionado en las conversaciones sobre el futuro de la comunicación científica es la condición de los documentos académicos como productos de una industria editorial (publicaciones). Aquí propongo que los documentos que evidencien actividades académicas y científicas se entiendan principalmente como documentos de archivo en sentido estricto, con todo lo que ello conlleva, y sin menoscabo de la naturaleza pública de muchos de ellos, ni de la necesidad de que sean sometidos a procesos de edición. Se generaría así un verdadero archivo académico (scholarly record), algo que no era posible en épocas previas por limitaciones técnicas. Esta radical diferencia de enfoque pone de manifiesto la necesidad de que las instituciones y comunidades académicas asuman la responsabilidad de gobernar los procesos de comunicación científica, demanda recientemente pronunciada por diversas instituciones y grupos de expertos internacionales. Así, la perspectiva esbozada aquí pretende equiparar y reconciliar la gestión de proceso","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131896859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Una propuesta arriesgada: hacer de los repositorios mega-journals","authors":"J. Ortega","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a29","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this communication is to consider the new problems that open-access models are posing for scholarly communication. Double charging, publishers with nonstandard practices, and biases associated with accessing the publishing market are some of the recent problems that the pay-to-publish model is producing. Taking these problems into account, this paper presents a proposal for combining the green and gold models, proposing a solution that could benefit the publishing system, separating it from the commercial sector. The article suggests the creation of journals through repositories, which would permit articles reviewed through open access, whose evaluation process would be supported by the same entities that fund them, to be published removed from commercial interests. The proposal is set out as a debatable idea that discusses the commercial nature of scientific publishing. \u0000\u0000Resumen\u0000La presente nota pretende hacer una reflexión sobre los nuevos problemas que el modelo open access está trayendo a la comunicación científica. Dobles imposiciones, editoriales con comportamiento no estándar y sesgos en el acceso al mercado de publicación son algunos de los recientes males que el modelo de pago por publicación está generando. A partir de ahí, se describe una propuesta que aúna las vías verde y dorada, proponiendo una solución que podría beneficiar al sistema de publicación desligándolo del sector comercial. El artículo propone la creación de revistas dentro de los repositorios, que permitan la publicación, lejos de los intereses comerciales, de artículos revisados en abierto e incentivados en los procesos de evaluación por los mismos entes que lo financian. La propuesta se plantea como una forma de debate sobre el carácter comercial de la publicación científica.","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130363447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Revisitando el panorama CRIS en España","authors":"Pablo De-Castro","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a36","url":null,"abstract":"This text is a follow-up to the previous ThinkEPI note on this subject published back in 2019 (De-Castro, 2019). The piece reflects on the two main functions that Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) are aimed to fulfill. These to some extent conflicting functions are in the first place to showcase the research activity conducted within an organization as a practical implementation of Open Science, and then to collect and store institutional research information for internal use in evidence-based decision-making processes. The text argues that both functions are in fact complementary. Moreover, simultaneously pursuing both of them requires an efficient collaboration across systems (technical interoperability) and across the various institutional units involved in the management and administration of CRIS systems (human interoperability). The text explores the present CRIS landscape in Spain under this double-function perspective and highlights some best-practice case studies in terms of this collaboration.\u0000\u0000\u0000Resumen\u0000Como continuación a la nota ThinkEPI de 2019 sobre esta misma materia (De-Castro, 2019), este texto reflexiona sobre las dos principales funciones, en cierta medida contrapuestas entre sí, de los sistemas de gestión de la información científica o CRIS. Éstas son por un lado visibilizar la investigación realizada en una organización como aplicación práctica de la ciencia abierta, y por el otro recoger y almacenar información científica de uso interno para la toma de decisiones basadas en la evidencia. Se argumenta que ambas funciones son complementarias y su puesta en práctica simultánea requiere una eficiente colaboración entre los diversos sistemas (interoperabilidad técnica) y las múltiples áreas institucionales involucradas en la gestión y administración de sistemas CRIS (interoperabilidad humana). El texto examina el panorama CRIS actual en España bajo el prisma de esta doble función y destaca algunos ejemplos de buenas prácticas en materia de colaboración.","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133068091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diseño de edificios bibliotecarios y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible","authors":"A. García-Rodríguez, Raquel Gómez-Díaz","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a34","url":null,"abstract":"The achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is one of the concerns present in the work of many libraries. In addition to raising awareness, training, collection development, etc., library buildings and infrastructures can also contribute to achieving the goals and objectives set out in the 2030 Agenda. The IFLA, different associations, and organizations have been working along these lines, although the percentage of actions in this vein is still in the minority compared with the other lines mentioned. In this article, the importance of sustainable library buildings is studied, as well as the measures that are being implemented and that seek to contribute to the care of the environment by improving life on the planet.\u0000\u0000\u0000Resumen: La consecución de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) es una de las preocupaciones presentes en el trabajo de muchas bibliotecas. Además de la sensibilización, la formación, el desarrollo de colecciones… etc. los edificios e infraestructuras bibliotecarias también pueden contribuir a lograr las metas y objetivos marcados en la Agenda 2030. La IFLA, diferentes asociaciones y organismos trabajaban en esta línea, aunque el porcentaje de acciones en este sentido es todavía minoritario frente a las otras líneas mencionadas. En este artículo, se estudia la importancia de los edificios bibliotecarios sostenibles, así como las medidas que se están implementando y que buscan contribuir al cuidado del medio ambiente mejorado la vida en el planeta.","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"1 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123299657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}