Electricity Journal最新文献_第7页

Cost and emissions impact of voluntary clean energy procurement strategies 自愿清洁能源采购战略的成本和排放影响

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107383

Hua He, Alexander Derenchuk, Richard Tabors, Aleksandr Rudkevich

{"title":"Cost and emissions impact of voluntary clean energy procurement strategies","authors":"Hua He, Alexander Derenchuk, Richard Tabors, Aleksandr Rudkevich","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2024.107383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2024.107383","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large electricity consumers, particularly companies in the technology sector, are pursuing several different strategies to reduce their Scope 2 emissions through clean energy procurement. We calculate the cost and effectiveness of four different clean energy procurement strategies: U.S.-wide annual energy matching, local annual energy matching, hourly energy matching, and carbon matching. Carbon matching requires balancing emissions attributable to electricity load with avoided emissions from clean energy procurement (calculated with locational marginal emission rates), while energy matching requires balancing load and clean energy generation on an annual or hourly timescale. We evaluated these strategies as pursued by large electricity consumers with two different load profiles located in five different U.S. regions which vary in regulatory structure. We find that carbon matching is the most cost-effective procurement strategy, with a cost between $4.7 and $7.6/MWh, and has the lowest carbon emissions abatement cost at $13/t CO<sub>2</sub> displaced. We find that annual energy matching costs range from $10/MWh to $32/MWh, and that it does not guarantee carbon neutrality. Hourly energy matching costs are higher, ranging from $68/MWh to $181/MWh, depending on region and load profile, and it is the least cost-effective strategy at carbon emissions reduction, with abatement costs ranging from $77/t CO<sub>2</sub> to $161/t CO<sub>2</sub>. These results suggest that targeting clean energy investment in regions where current renewable energy penetration is low and marginal emissions rates are high is the most effective way for individual actors to reduce Scope 2 carbon emissions and reach carbon neutrality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 107383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619024000186/pdfft?md5=6d7eab82800dc497816a639a4bba4a80&pid=1-s2.0-S1040619024000186-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140160063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ultimate flexibility in future CO2-free dispatchable power generation: Transition pathways for the Netherlands 未来无二氧化碳可调度发电的最终灵活性：荷兰的转型之路

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107395

Arjan F. Kirkels , Sjoerd H.A. Pernot

引用次数: 0

Trends and drivers of distribution utility costs in the United States: A descriptive analysis from 2008 to 2022 美国配电公用事业成本的趋势和驱动因素：2008 年至 2022 年的描述性分析

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107397

Nicholas Crowley, Daniel McLeod

引用次数: 0

Do notifications affect households’ willingness to pay to avoid power outages? Evidence from an experimental stated-preference survey in California 通知是否会影响家庭为避免停电而付费的意愿？来自加利福尼亚州实验性陈述偏好调查的证据

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107385

Will Gorman , Duncan Callaway

引用次数: 0

True cost of electric service: What reliability metrics alone fail to communicate 电力服务的真实成本：仅靠可靠性指标无法传达的信息

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107386

Robert A. García Cooper, Marcel Castro Sitiriche , Agustín Irizarry Rivera , Fabio Andrade Rengifo

{"title":"True cost of electric service: What reliability metrics alone fail to communicate","authors":"Robert A. García Cooper, Marcel Castro Sitiriche , Agustín Irizarry Rivera , Fabio Andrade Rengifo","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2024.107386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2024.107386","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Valuing electric power, particularly its loss within the residential sector, has historically been a great challenge that many researchers have undertaken without reaching a consensus. Electric power can be troublesome to appraise because consumption is not the customer’s main goal, but rather a means to achieve a desired good or service that often has unquantifiable personal value. This paper proposes a market-based household production method that quantifies the customer electric service interruption costs in the residential sector. Because an individual’s personal time is necessary to replace services owing to the lack of electric power, we propose a method that estimates the weighted market cost of a person’s time in accordance with their occupation to better calculate customer outage costs. We also present a macroeconomic production method to estimate losses in the residential sector. Finally, we propose a method for calculating the true costs of electric services by factoring the outage costs with the electrical utility rate to be analyzed using reliability metrics. The proposed approach facilitates a closer estimation of the low-bound true costs of utility-supplied electrical services for consumers who have not taken mitigation measures, serving as a warning for energy regulators to impose corrective actions or appropriate penalties on unreliable utilities and/or as an indicator for customers to invest in alternative energy sources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 107386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140052083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Toward a physical Dodge City high voltage direct current (HVDC) electricity hub 建立道奇市高压直流 (HVDC) 电力枢纽站

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107384

Jeff D. Makholm

{"title":"Toward a physical Dodge City high voltage direct current (HVDC) electricity hub","authors":"Jeff D. Makholm","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2024.107384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2024.107384","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A physical Dodge City high voltage direct current (HVDC) electricity commodity hub would foster the kind of risk transfer that would invite the full participation of the financial industry in an interstate transmission system essential to the speedy development of renewable electricity and complementary storage technologies. Obstacles lie in the way of such a vision, however. Chief among them, paradoxically, is the administrative system that has evolved since the late 1990 s to promote regional electricity markets. That system abstracts from investment risk and the nation’s uneven geography of renewable resources. It lodges a kind of monopoly planning and scheduling power in a small group of bureaucratic centralized system operators that mimics a command economy in their own distinct regions, not the kind of market economy that has traditionally driven investment in US interstate energy infrastructure. And yet, in dealing with the vexing transmission constraints faced by the renewable generating sector (the “queue”), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) continues to pursue ever greater authority for those regional transmission organizations (RTOs). Such FERC action regarding its RTOs in 2022–23 represents a highly evident case of <em>path dependency</em>—a problem—that state or federal policy makers wishing to speed the entry of large-scale renewable generation, and complementary storage technologies, will have find a way either to confront directly or to work around.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 107384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140016317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

More transmission or more storage? Decarbonization in the context of hydro-rich Northeastern North America 更多输电还是更多储电？水力资源丰富的北美东北部地区的去碳化问题

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107375

Aïssatou Ba , Justin Caron , Pierre-Olivier Pineau

{"title":"More transmission or more storage? Decarbonization in the context of hydro-rich Northeastern North America","authors":"Aïssatou Ba , Justin Caron , Pierre-Olivier Pineau","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2024.107375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2024.107375","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decarbonizing electric systems through the integration of large amounts of intermittent renewable energy complicates the balancing of demand and supply, increasing the value of storage. With the rapid expansion of short-term storage options such as batteries, flexible resources such as existing hydroelectric reservoir storage are often overlooked. Using a capacity expansion and dispatch model of the Northeastern North American power system, we draw lessons from the interconnection potential of Quebec’s large existing hydropower capacities. We find that reservoir-transmission coupling significantly decreases the cost of decarbonization, even when short-term storage costs are low, because it is used for both daily and seasonal balancing. Conversely, the value of short-term storage is compromised by the availability of reservoir-transmission coupling, even assuming high investment costs for transmission. We also describe the regional distribution of costs and benefits of storage and transmission and discuss implications for regional cooperation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"37 2","pages":"Article 107375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619024000101/pdfft?md5=db9e24f8c07742257154a6628a3fa116&pid=1-s2.0-S1040619024000101-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140062961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Energy poverty and social justice in Mexico: The rights of electricity consumers 墨西哥的能源贫困与社会公正：电力消费者的权利

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107372

Miguel Ángel Marmolejo Cervantes, Lisa Reilly Solís

引用次数: 0

Putin’s power play: Russia’s attacks on Ukraine’s electric power infrastructure violate international law 普京的权力游戏俄罗斯袭击乌克兰电力基础设施违反国际法

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107371

Julia E. Sullivan , Dmitriy Kamensky

{"title":"Putin’s power play: Russia’s attacks on Ukraine’s electric power infrastructure violate international law","authors":"Julia E. Sullivan , Dmitriy Kamensky","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2024.107371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2024.107371","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>International humanitarian law is a branch of public international law that seeks to moderate the conduct of wars to protect those who are not taking part in the hostilities. Under international humanitarian law, belligerents may not intentionally target civilians or installations that are indispensable to the survival of the civilian population. While collateral harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure may occur, international humanitarian law prohibits attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. In practice, these principles have not always been honored or enforced. State and non-state actors have deliberately targeted civilians and/or disregarded civilian impacts, often for the purpose of pressuring political leaders to capitulate. The increasing occurrence and severity of harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure in modern conflicts calls into question the continuing relevance of what were once viewed as fundamental protections. In this paper, we present a case study involving Russia’s 2022–23 attacks on Ukraine’s electric power infrastructure, which left millions of civilians without heat, water, or other basic services for extended periods in harsh winter conditions. Considering the scope, scale, and long-term impacts of these attacks, we conclude that Russia violated international law. We also suggest that a new international protocol may be necessary in order to more effectively deter and punish attacks on civilian infrastructure in future armed conflicts and military occupations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"37 2","pages":"Article 107371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139936715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reviewing the overcapacity claim: Insights from Kenya’s electricity sector 审查产能过剩说法：肯尼亚电力部门的启示

Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2024.107374

Lewis Waswa , Martin Kitetu , Mark Thurber , Murefu Barasa , Lily Odarno , Steve Brick

引用次数: 0