审查产能过剩说法:肯尼亚电力部门的启示

Q1 Social Sciences
Lewis Waswa , Martin Kitetu , Mark Thurber , Murefu Barasa , Lily Odarno , Steve Brick
{"title":"审查产能过剩说法:肯尼亚电力部门的启示","authors":"Lewis Waswa ,&nbsp;Martin Kitetu ,&nbsp;Mark Thurber ,&nbsp;Murefu Barasa ,&nbsp;Lily Odarno ,&nbsp;Steve Brick","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2024.107374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Typical approaches to assessing excess generation capacity in African electricity systems have considered the nameplate capacities of existing generation plants, the planned generation capacity, and peak load. However, the omission of variables such as the condition of transmission and distribution infrastructure, the age of existing power plants, and whether generation capacity is intermittent (as in the case of wind or solar) or subject to climate impacts (as in the case of hydropower) has caused such assessments to be misleading. This can result in misguided public policy and power procurement processes that are poorly matched to the needs of evolving power systems. In this paper, we analyze the case of Kenya to show how power system planning must consider these key factors that are often ignored. Far from having excess capacity as has been repeatedly reported, the Kenyan grid has limited capacity to take up additional load at present.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing the overcapacity claim: Insights from Kenya’s electricity sector\",\"authors\":\"Lewis Waswa ,&nbsp;Martin Kitetu ,&nbsp;Mark Thurber ,&nbsp;Murefu Barasa ,&nbsp;Lily Odarno ,&nbsp;Steve Brick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tej.2024.107374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Typical approaches to assessing excess generation capacity in African electricity systems have considered the nameplate capacities of existing generation plants, the planned generation capacity, and peak load. However, the omission of variables such as the condition of transmission and distribution infrastructure, the age of existing power plants, and whether generation capacity is intermittent (as in the case of wind or solar) or subject to climate impacts (as in the case of hydropower) has caused such assessments to be misleading. This can result in misguided public policy and power procurement processes that are poorly matched to the needs of evolving power systems. In this paper, we analyze the case of Kenya to show how power system planning must consider these key factors that are often ignored. Far from having excess capacity as has been repeatedly reported, the Kenyan grid has limited capacity to take up additional load at present.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electricity Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electricity Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619024000095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619024000095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估非洲电力系统过剩发电能力的典型方法考虑了现有发电厂的铭牌发电能力、计划发电能力和高峰负荷。然而,由于忽略了一些变量,如输配电基础设施的状况、现有发电厂的使用年限,以及发电能力是否是间歇性的(如风能或太阳能)或是否受气候影响(如水电)等,导致此类评估具有误导性。这可能导致公共政策和电力采购过程受到误导,无法很好地满足不断发展的电力系统的需求。在本文中,我们分析了肯尼亚的案例,以说明电力系统规划必须如何考虑这些经常被忽视的关键因素。肯尼亚的电网远非如多次报道的那样存在过剩容量,而是目前承担额外负荷的能力有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reviewing the overcapacity claim: Insights from Kenya’s electricity sector

Typical approaches to assessing excess generation capacity in African electricity systems have considered the nameplate capacities of existing generation plants, the planned generation capacity, and peak load. However, the omission of variables such as the condition of transmission and distribution infrastructure, the age of existing power plants, and whether generation capacity is intermittent (as in the case of wind or solar) or subject to climate impacts (as in the case of hydropower) has caused such assessments to be misleading. This can result in misguided public policy and power procurement processes that are poorly matched to the needs of evolving power systems. In this paper, we analyze the case of Kenya to show how power system planning must consider these key factors that are often ignored. Far from having excess capacity as has been repeatedly reported, the Kenyan grid has limited capacity to take up additional load at present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信