True cost of electric service: What reliability metrics alone fail to communicate

Q1 Social Sciences
Robert A. García Cooper, Marcel Castro Sitiriche , Agustín Irizarry Rivera , Fabio Andrade Rengifo
{"title":"True cost of electric service: What reliability metrics alone fail to communicate","authors":"Robert A. García Cooper,&nbsp;Marcel Castro Sitiriche ,&nbsp;Agustín Irizarry Rivera ,&nbsp;Fabio Andrade Rengifo","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2024.107386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Valuing electric power, particularly its loss within the residential sector, has historically been a great challenge that many researchers have undertaken without reaching a consensus. Electric power can be troublesome to appraise because consumption is not the customer’s main goal, but rather a means to achieve a desired good or service that often has unquantifiable personal value. This paper proposes a market-based household production method that quantifies the customer electric service interruption costs in the residential sector. Because an individual’s personal time is necessary to replace services owing to the lack of electric power, we propose a method that estimates the weighted market cost of a person’s time in accordance with their occupation to better calculate customer outage costs. We also present a macroeconomic production method to estimate losses in the residential sector. Finally, we propose a method for calculating the true costs of electric services by factoring the outage costs with the electrical utility rate to be analyzed using reliability metrics. The proposed approach facilitates a closer estimation of the low-bound true costs of utility-supplied electrical services for consumers who have not taken mitigation measures, serving as a warning for energy regulators to impose corrective actions or appropriate penalties on unreliable utilities and/or as an indicator for customers to invest in alternative energy sources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619024000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Valuing electric power, particularly its loss within the residential sector, has historically been a great challenge that many researchers have undertaken without reaching a consensus. Electric power can be troublesome to appraise because consumption is not the customer’s main goal, but rather a means to achieve a desired good or service that often has unquantifiable personal value. This paper proposes a market-based household production method that quantifies the customer electric service interruption costs in the residential sector. Because an individual’s personal time is necessary to replace services owing to the lack of electric power, we propose a method that estimates the weighted market cost of a person’s time in accordance with their occupation to better calculate customer outage costs. We also present a macroeconomic production method to estimate losses in the residential sector. Finally, we propose a method for calculating the true costs of electric services by factoring the outage costs with the electrical utility rate to be analyzed using reliability metrics. The proposed approach facilitates a closer estimation of the low-bound true costs of utility-supplied electrical services for consumers who have not taken mitigation measures, serving as a warning for energy regulators to impose corrective actions or appropriate penalties on unreliable utilities and/or as an indicator for customers to invest in alternative energy sources.

电力服务的真实成本:仅靠可靠性指标无法传达的信息
对电力进行估价,尤其是对居民用电的损耗进行估价,历来都是一项巨大的挑战,许多研究人员都对此进行过研究,但都没有达成共识。由于电力消费不是用户的主要目标,而是实现理想商品或服务的一种手段,而这种商品或服务往往具有无法量化的个人价值,因此电力的评估会很麻烦。本文提出了一种基于市场的家庭生产方法,该方法可量化居民用户的电力服务中断成本。由于个人的个人时间是因电力不足而替代服务所必需的,因此我们提出了一种根据个人职业估算个人时间的加权市场成本的方法,以更好地计算客户中断成本。我们还提出了一种宏观经济生产方法,用于估算住宅部门的损失。最后,我们提出了一种计算电力服务真实成本的方法,将停电成本与电力公司费率相联系,利用可靠性指标进行分析。所提出的方法有助于更准确地估算出未采取缓解措施的消费者在电力公司提供的电力服务中的低限真实成本,为能源监管机构提供警示,以便对不可靠的电力公司采取纠正措施或进行适当处罚,以及/或作为客户投资替代能源的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信