发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
PUMA SE v NIKE INNOVATE C.V. PUMA SE诉NIKE INNOVATE C.V.
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac040
{"title":"PUMA SE v NIKE INNOVATE C.V.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac040","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks—Opposition proceedings—FOOTWARE—Registrability—Descriptiveness—Mis-spelling—Neologisms—Computer software—Cloud computing services—Telecommunications—Appeal to High Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121493044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FACEBOOK IRELAND LTD v VOXER IP LLC FACEBOOK爱尔兰有限公司诉VOXER IP有限公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac046
{"title":"FACEBOOK IRELAND LTD v VOXER IP LLC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac046","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European patents — Telecommunications — Live broadcast features —Infringement — Validity—Skilled person — Common general knowledge — Proposed amendments — Construction — Clarity — Added matter — Infringement on normal construction — Equivalence — Formstein defences — Obviousness — Insufficiency — Enablement","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126529568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS, SA v RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC 菲利普莫里斯产品公司诉RAI战略控股公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac035
{"title":"PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS, SA v RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac035","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European Patents — Tobacco products — “Heat Not Burn” technology — Validity — Infringement — Construction — “For use with” — The role of preferred embodiments — Person skilled in the art — Common general knowledge — Added matter — Pleadings — Obviousness — Arbitrary choices — Lack of technical contribution — Infringement — Exclusive licences","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121901623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DELTA AIR LINES, INC v ONTRO LTD 达美航空公司与control有限公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac039
{"title":"DELTA AIR LINES, INC v ONTRO LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac039","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks—Opposition proceedings—Device marks—SKYCLUB—Pleadings—Inadequacy of counterstatement—Applications to amend—Amendment on appeal—Comparison of goods and services—Interpretation of the word “featuring”—Whether air transportation services similar to in-flight magazines, loyalty schemes, chauffeur services, storage and collection of luggage and arrangement of meals for travellers—Likelihood of confusion—Applications to stay pending EUIPO proceedings—Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129651603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD v GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN) (No. 2) NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD诉GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN)(第2号)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac028
{"title":"NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD v GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN) (No. 2)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac028","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — Insomnia treatments — Melatonin — Validity — Concurrent appeal in opposition proceedings before EPO — European Patent (UK) found invalid by the Patents Court — Consequentials order — “Sunset” provision included in respect of injunctive relief but not otherwise — Consequentials order made but not formally drawn up — Appeal to EPO Technical Board of Appeal withdrawn by patentee two days after consequentials order hearing — Patent treated as invalid ab initio — Jurisdiction to re-visit terms of consequentials order — Jurisdiction to vary or revoke under CPR r.3.1(7) — Barrell jurisdiction — Exercise of discretion — Grant of permission to appeal — Costs of the action — Case management","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126220362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SKY LTD (FORMERLY SKY PLC) v SKYKICK UK LTD (No. 4) SKY LTD(原SKY PLC)诉SKYKICK UK LTD(第4名)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcab025
{"title":"SKY LTD (FORMERLY SKY PLC) v SKYKICK UK LTD (No. 4)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab025","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade Marks — European trade marks — SKY — Validity — Broad specifications of goods and services — Bad faith — Requirement of clarity and precision — Lack of bona fide intention to use — Declarations of intention to use — “Computer software” — Partial validity — Case management — “Electronic mail services” — Infringement — Likelihood of confusion — Lack of evidence of confusion — Whether necessary to consider all alleged acts of infringement — Passing off — Application of the judgment on reference to Court of Justice — Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115645691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD v COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS 联想(新加坡)私人有限公司诉专利总审计长案
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcab028
{"title":"LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD v COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab028","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents—Patentability—Excluded subject matter—Computer programs—Business methods—Contactless payments—“Card clash”—Appeal to Patents Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115601490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sky Plc v Skykick Uk Ltd (No. 3) Sky Plc诉Skykick Uk Ltd(第3号)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcab024
{"title":"Sky Plc v Skykick Uk Ltd (No. 3)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab024","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade Marks—European trade marks—SKY—Validity—Broad specifications of goods and services—Bad faith—Requirement of clarity and precision—Lack of intention to use—Reference to Court of Justice—Application of the judgment of the Court of Justice—“Computer software”—“Telecommunication services”—Limiting the specification of goods—Interpretation of broad terms in specifications—Infringement","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124604111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Eli Lilly and CO v Genentech, Inc 礼来公司诉基因泰克公司案
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcab016
{"title":"Eli Lilly and CO v Genentech, Inc","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 European patents – Revocation proceedings – Divisional Patents – Pharmaceuticals –Preliminary issue – Summary judgment - Issue estoppel – Abuse of process – UK designation of closely related patent held invalid at first instance – Permission granted to appeal to the Court of Appeal - Related patent now also held invalid in central proceedings before the EPO – Special circumstances – Injustice – Application to amend claims – Plausibility – Changes in common general knowledge – Case management","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121155285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
KUROBUTA LTD v HALLSWORTH KUROBUTA LTD诉HALLSWORTH
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac018
{"title":"KUROBUTA LTD v HALLSWORTH","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac018","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks — Invalidity proceedings—Restaurant names — KUROBUTA — Locus standi — Earlier right — Passing off — Proprietorship — Relevant dates — Assignment of goodwill — Exclusion of the benefit of actual or potential claims — Effect of assignments in gross — Partial invalidity — Likelihood of confusion —Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132630153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信