{"title":"SKY LTD(原SKY PLC)诉SKYKICK UK LTD(第4名)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Trade Marks — European trade marks — SKY — Validity — Broad specifications of goods and services — Bad faith — Requirement of clarity and precision — Lack of bona fide intention to use — Declarations of intention to use — “Computer software” — Partial validity — Case management — “Electronic mail services” — Infringement — Likelihood of confusion — Lack of evidence of confusion — Whether necessary to consider all alleged acts of infringement — Passing off — Application of the judgment on reference to Court of Justice — Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SKY LTD (FORMERLY SKY PLC) v SKYKICK UK LTD (No. 4)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpc/rcab025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n H1 Trade Marks — European trade marks — SKY — Validity — Broad specifications of goods and services — Bad faith — Requirement of clarity and precision — Lack of bona fide intention to use — Declarations of intention to use — “Computer software” — Partial validity — Case management — “Electronic mail services” — Infringement — Likelihood of confusion — Lack of evidence of confusion — Whether necessary to consider all alleged acts of infringement — Passing off — Application of the judgment on reference to Court of Justice — Appeal to Court of Appeal\",\"PeriodicalId\":336842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
SKY LTD (FORMERLY SKY PLC) v SKYKICK UK LTD (No. 4)
H1 Trade Marks — European trade marks — SKY — Validity — Broad specifications of goods and services — Bad faith — Requirement of clarity and precision — Lack of bona fide intention to use — Declarations of intention to use — “Computer software” — Partial validity — Case management — “Electronic mail services” — Infringement — Likelihood of confusion — Lack of evidence of confusion — Whether necessary to consider all alleged acts of infringement — Passing off — Application of the judgment on reference to Court of Justice — Appeal to Court of Appeal