{"title":"NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD v GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN) (No. 2)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — Insomnia treatments — Melatonin — Validity — Concurrent appeal in opposition proceedings before EPO — European Patent (UK) found invalid by the Patents Court — Consequentials order — “Sunset” provision included in respect of injunctive relief but not otherwise — Consequentials order made but not formally drawn up — Appeal to EPO Technical Board of Appeal withdrawn by patentee two days after consequentials order hearing — Patent treated as invalid ab initio — Jurisdiction to re-visit terms of consequentials order — Jurisdiction to vary or revoke under CPR r.3.1(7) — Barrell jurisdiction — Exercise of discretion — Grant of permission to appeal — Costs of the action — Case management","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — Insomnia treatments — Melatonin — Validity — Concurrent appeal in opposition proceedings before EPO — European Patent (UK) found invalid by the Patents Court — Consequentials order — “Sunset” provision included in respect of injunctive relief but not otherwise — Consequentials order made but not formally drawn up — Appeal to EPO Technical Board of Appeal withdrawn by patentee two days after consequentials order hearing — Patent treated as invalid ab initio — Jurisdiction to re-visit terms of consequentials order — Jurisdiction to vary or revoke under CPR r.3.1(7) — Barrell jurisdiction — Exercise of discretion — Grant of permission to appeal — Costs of the action — Case management