NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD诉GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN)(第2号)

{"title":"NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD诉GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN)(第2号)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — Insomnia treatments — Melatonin — Validity — Concurrent appeal in opposition proceedings before EPO — European Patent (UK) found invalid by the Patents Court — Consequentials order — “Sunset” provision included in respect of injunctive relief but not otherwise — Consequentials order made but not formally drawn up — Appeal to EPO Technical Board of Appeal withdrawn by patentee two days after consequentials order hearing — Patent treated as invalid ab initio — Jurisdiction to re-visit terms of consequentials order — Jurisdiction to vary or revoke under CPR r.3.1(7) — Barrell jurisdiction — Exercise of discretion — Grant of permission to appeal — Costs of the action — Case management","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD v GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN) (No. 2)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpc/rcac028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — Insomnia treatments — Melatonin — Validity — Concurrent appeal in opposition proceedings before EPO — European Patent (UK) found invalid by the Patents Court — Consequentials order — “Sunset” provision included in respect of injunctive relief but not otherwise — Consequentials order made but not formally drawn up — Appeal to EPO Technical Board of Appeal withdrawn by patentee two days after consequentials order hearing — Patent treated as invalid ab initio — Jurisdiction to re-visit terms of consequentials order — Jurisdiction to vary or revoke under CPR r.3.1(7) — Barrell jurisdiction — Exercise of discretion — Grant of permission to appeal — Costs of the action — Case management\",\"PeriodicalId\":336842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

H1专利-欧洲专利-药物-失眠治疗-褪黑素-有效性-在欧洲专利局的反对程序中同时上诉-欧洲专利(英国)被专利法院裁定无效-结果命令-“日落”条款包括禁令救济,但不包括其他内容-结果命令已制定但未正式起草-结果命令听证会两天后专利权人撤回对欧洲专利局技术上诉委员会的上诉-被视为从头开始无效的专利-重审结果令条款的管辖权-根据CPR第3.1(7)条变更或撤销的管辖权- Barrell管辖权-行使自由裁量权-授予上诉许可-诉讼费用-案件管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD v GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN) (No. 2)
H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — Insomnia treatments — Melatonin — Validity — Concurrent appeal in opposition proceedings before EPO — European Patent (UK) found invalid by the Patents Court — Consequentials order — “Sunset” provision included in respect of injunctive relief but not otherwise — Consequentials order made but not formally drawn up — Appeal to EPO Technical Board of Appeal withdrawn by patentee two days after consequentials order hearing — Patent treated as invalid ab initio — Jurisdiction to re-visit terms of consequentials order — Jurisdiction to vary or revoke under CPR r.3.1(7) — Barrell jurisdiction — Exercise of discretion — Grant of permission to appeal — Costs of the action — Case management
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信