发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV v TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS公司vs TINNO移动技术公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac024
{"title":"KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV v TINNO MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CORP","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac024","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents—European patents—Standards essential patents—Infringement proceedings—FRAND issues—Co-pending proceedings in France—Application to stay the English proceedings—Whether English court first seised—Whether related actions—Whether risk of irreconcilable judgments—Relevance of previous jurisdictional challenge under CPR Part 11—Declaratory relief—Interim damages applications—Disclosure in relation to damages claim","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130304097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ILLUMINA CAMBRIDGE LTD v LATVIA MGI TECH SIA ILLUMINA CAMBRIDGE LTD诉拉脱维亚MGI TECH SIA
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac021
{"title":"ILLUMINA CAMBRIDGE LTD v LATVIA MGI TECH SIA","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac021","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European Patents — Infringement — Validity — Process claims — DNA sequencing systems — Skilled person — Common general knowledge — Construction — Normal interpretation — Equivalence — Obviousness — Hindsight — Mere collocations — Priority — Insufficiency — Added matter — Amendment","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121143137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FREDDY SPA v HUGZ CLOTHING LTD 弗雷迪SPA诉HUGZ服装有限公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac009
{"title":"FREDDY SPA v HUGZ CLOTHING LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac009","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — Unregistered designs — Passing off — Breach of settlement agreement — Clothing — Shapewear jeans — Validity — Infringement — Claim construction — Novelty — Obviousness — Goodwill — Product appearance — Post-sale confusion — Subsistence of unregistered design right — Features of shape and configuration — Shape of garment “as worn” — Method or principle of construction — Must fit — Must match — Surface decoration — Licence of right","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123980319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v ASUSTEK COMPUTER INCORPORATION (No. 2) KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS股份有限公司vs华硕电脑股份有限公司(第2名)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-04-29 DOI: 10.1093/RPC/RCAA022
Patents Court
{"title":"KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v ASUSTEK COMPUTER INCORPORATION (No. 2)","authors":"Patents Court","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA022","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – European patents – Standards essential patents – Infringement – FRAND trials – Striking out – Defendant no longer seeking FRAND licence and offering to submit to injunctive relief and pay damages for past acts of infringement – Damages remaining at large – Application to be removed from trial to determine FRAND royalty rate – Basis of assessment of damages – Relevance of terms of any FRAND licence settled by the court – Scope of sales for which damages payable – Assessment of appropriate royalty rate","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131998049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WARNER MUSIC UK LTD v TUNEIN INC (No. 2) 华纳音乐英国有限公司诉TUNEIN INC(第2名)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-04-07 DOI: 10.1093/RPC/RCAA017
Chancery Division
{"title":"WARNER MUSIC UK LTD v TUNEIN INC (No. 2)","authors":"Chancery Division","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA017","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Copyright – Infringement – Sound recordings – Internet radio services – Use of hyperlinks – Communication to the public – Scope and effect of finding on liability – Relief – Whether injunctive relief in general terms appropriate – Whether injunctive relief and any damages inquiry should be limited to specific instances of liability established at trial – Proportionality – Stay of injunction pending appeal – Costs – Relevance of commercial importance of particular issues","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127554908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD v GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN) NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD诉GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac004
{"title":"NEURIM PHARMACEUTICALS (1991) LTD v GENERICS UK LTD (T/A MYLAN)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — Interim injunctions — Proposed generic launch — Expedited trial — Assessment of adequacy of damages — Balance of convenience — Clearing the path — Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123746630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MERCK SHARP & DOHME LTD v WYETH LLC 默克公司诉惠氏公司案
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac006
{"title":"MERCK SHARP & DOHME LTD v WYETH LLC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European patents — Vaccines — Formulations — Use of surfactants — Revocation — Infringement — Validity — Construction — Person skilled in the art — Common general knowledge — Reliance on textbooks and scientific publications — Reliance on other vaccines containing surfactants — Whether claim limited to use in vaccines with identified serotypes only — Added matter — Novelty — Obviousness","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122733092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ROBERT BOSCH GMBH v BOSCO BRANDS UK LTD 博世公司诉博世品牌英国有限公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac003
{"title":"ROBERT BOSCH GMBH v BOSCO BRANDS UK LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks — Opposition proceedings — BOSCO plus device — Comparison of five-letter marks — “Short” marks — Likelihood of confusion — Service marks — Interpretation of specifications of services — Retail services — Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115259344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
LUFTHANSA TECHNIK AG v ASTRONICS ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 汉莎航空技术有限公司先进电子系统
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcac005
{"title":"LUFTHANSA TECHNIK AG v ASTRONICS ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European Patents — Airline in-seat power supply apparatus — Infringement — Validity — Construction — Person skilled in the art — Prior art documents referred to in body of specification — Fuzzy boundaries — Novelty — Obviousness — Mindset — Safety considerations — Direct infringement — Indirect infringement — Requirement of knowledge — Joint tortfeasance","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"307 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133918055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FITNESS LEISURE LTD’S TRADE MARK APPLICATION 康体休闲有限公司商标申请
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-02-22 DOI: 10.1093/RPC/RCAA003
Appointed Person
{"title":"FITNESS LEISURE LTD’S TRADE MARK APPLICATION","authors":"Appointed Person","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks – Opposition proceedings – Procedure – Failure to consider all grounds advanced by the opponent – Earlier marks – Assessment of likelihood of confusion – Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129311282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信