{"title":"KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS股份有限公司vs华硕电脑股份有限公司(第2名)","authors":"Patents Court","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Patents – European patents – Standards essential patents – Infringement – FRAND trials – Striking out – Defendant no longer seeking FRAND licence and offering to submit to injunctive relief and pay damages for past acts of infringement – Damages remaining at large – Application to be removed from trial to determine FRAND royalty rate – Basis of assessment of damages – Relevance of terms of any FRAND licence settled by the court – Scope of sales for which damages payable – Assessment of appropriate royalty rate","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v ASUSTEK COMPUTER INCORPORATION (No. 2)\",\"authors\":\"Patents Court\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/RPC/RCAA022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n H1 Patents – European patents – Standards essential patents – Infringement – FRAND trials – Striking out – Defendant no longer seeking FRAND licence and offering to submit to injunctive relief and pay damages for past acts of infringement – Damages remaining at large – Application to be removed from trial to determine FRAND royalty rate – Basis of assessment of damages – Relevance of terms of any FRAND licence settled by the court – Scope of sales for which damages payable – Assessment of appropriate royalty rate\",\"PeriodicalId\":336842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v ASUSTEK COMPUTER INCORPORATION (No. 2)
H1 Patents – European patents – Standards essential patents – Infringement – FRAND trials – Striking out – Defendant no longer seeking FRAND licence and offering to submit to injunctive relief and pay damages for past acts of infringement – Damages remaining at large – Application to be removed from trial to determine FRAND royalty rate – Basis of assessment of damages – Relevance of terms of any FRAND licence settled by the court – Scope of sales for which damages payable – Assessment of appropriate royalty rate
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
