{"title":"DIRAMODE S.A. v TURNHAM","authors":"Appointed Person","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks – Opposition proceedings – Word marks – PINKIES – Descriptiveness – Assessment of likelihood of confusion – Weight to be given to conceptual differences – Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133894069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"TINY REBEL BREWING CO LTD’S TRADE MARK APPLICATIONAppointed Person (Trade Marks)Prof. Ruth Annand: 16 August 2019BL O/482/19; [2019] R.P.C. 25","authors":"Appointed Person","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks – Opposition proceedings – Device marks – TROPICANA – Comparison of goods – Whether beers similar to fruit juices – Comparison of marks – Dominant element – Descriptiveness – Acquired distinctive character – Conceptual differences – Assessment of likelihood of confusion – Passing off – Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"43 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129713270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"VIIV HEALTHCARE CO v GILEAD SCIENCES, INC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac002","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — HIV treatments — Infringement — Doctrine of equivalents — Pleadings — Relevance of intention — Strike out application","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115235511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"SAZERAC BRANDS, LLC v LIVERPOOL GIN DISTILLERY LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab041","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade Marks — European trade marks — Alcoholic beverages — EAGLE RARE — AMERICAN EAGLE — Infringement — Global assessment — Average consumer — Likelihood of confusion — Indirect confusion — Reputation — Unfair advantage — Detriment to distinctive character","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117203451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"SIDONIO v CHANEL LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks — Opposition proceedings — Compound marks — Personal names — CHANEL’S GABRIELLE — Assessment of distinctive and dominant components — Conceptual similarity — Likelihood of confusion — Indirect confusion — “Wrong way round” confusion — Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126885048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"UNWIRED PLANET INTERNATIONAL LTD v HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab034","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European patents — Standards essential patents — Infringement proceedings — Nature of the FRAND undertaking — FRAND terms — Global licences — Jurisdiction — Forum conveniens — Justiciability — Non-discrimination — Assessment of comparability — Interplay between FRAND terms and competition law — No offer of licence terms before action — Injunctive relief — Appeal to Supreme Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"35 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115582007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC v KYMAB LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab038","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents — European patents — Pharmaceuticals — Antibody production — Genetic engineering — Transgenic mice — Infringement — Construction — Insufficiency — Biogen insufficiency — Nature of the invention — Whether a principle of general application — Enablement — Whether the scope of monopoly exceeding technical contribution to the art — Appeal to Supreme Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116042046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"E. MISHAN & SONS, INC v HOZELOCK LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab031","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents—European patents—Expandable garden hoses—Validity—Obviousness—Person skilled in the art—Prior art—Hose for aircrew breathing apparatus—Common general knowledge—Mere paper publications—Commercial success—Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121181866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"THALER v COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab037","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents—Patent applications—Identification of inventor—Artificial intelligence—DABUS—Statements of inventorship—Whether the inventor could be a machine—Entitlement to apply—Entitlement to grant—Appeal to Patents Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130771711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}