{"title":"THALER v COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Patents—Patent applications—Identification of inventor—Artificial intelligence—DABUS—Statements of inventorship—Whether the inventor could be a machine—Entitlement to apply—Entitlement to grant—Appeal to Patents Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
H1 Patents—Patent applications—Identification of inventor—Artificial intelligence—DABUS—Statements of inventorship—Whether the inventor could be a machine—Entitlement to apply—Entitlement to grant—Appeal to Patents Court