{"title":"AKEBIA THERAPEUTICS INC v FIBROGEN, INC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab021","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – European patents – Pharmaceuticals – Treatment of anaemia – Revocation – Infringement – Construction – Obviousness – Obvious to try – Reasonable expectation of success – Hindsight – Expert evidence – Sequential unmasking – Insufficiency – Excessive claim breadth – Uncertainty – Identification of technical contribution – Principles of general application – Plausibility – Undue burden – AgrEvo obviousness – Equivalence – File prosecution history – Process limited product claims – Indirect infringement – Means relating to an essential element of the invention – Whether suitable for putting and intended to put invention into effect – “Off-label” use – State of mind of defendants – Intentions of prescribing clinicians – Quia timet claims – Whether stay of infringement claim appropriate","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133806566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"GENENTECH INC v COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab020","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Supplementary protection certificates – Pharmaceuticals – Duration of protection – Failure to elect and pay for full term of protection – Whether election of shorter term of protection valid – Whether shorter term could be extended – Correction of irregularities – Notification of prescribed fees – Paediatric extensions – Whether available where shortened SPC term applied for – Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130951410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"EVALVE INC v EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LTD (No.2)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab019","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – European patents – Medical devices – Mitral valve repairs – Relief – Injunctions – Public interest – Damages in lieu","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115911580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"MEXICHEM UK LTD v HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab017","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – European patents – Revocation – Declaratory relief – Arrow declarations – Refrigerants for mobile air conditioning systems – Strike out application – Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122233785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"77m LTD v ORDNANCE SURVEY LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Database right – Infringement – Mapping – Geospatial coordinates – Address matching – Licensing agreements – Sub-licensing – Breach of contract – Construction – Scope of rights granted – Subsistence of database right – Verification of existing data – Extraction – Consultation – Re-utilisation – Defences – Authorised extraction – Time and place shifting – Information dissemination – Estoppel by representation – Inducing breach of contract – Justification","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"335 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120838116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Christie’s Trade Mark Application","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab014","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks – Opposition proceedings – ZOHARA – Likelihood of confusion – Identifying the average consumer – Assessing aural similarity – Differences in pronunciation – Global assessment – Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122781714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"IPCOM GMBH & CO KG v VODAFONE GROUP PLC","authors":"Patents Court","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA023","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – Standards essential patents – Technical trial – Construction – Validity – Conditional and unconditional amendments – Added matter – Extension of protection – Obviousness – Essentiality – Infringement – Indirect infringement – Defences – Crown use – De minimis use – Declarations of non-infringement","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125208520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"TEVA UK LIMITED v GILEAD SCIENCES, INC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcaa021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcaa021","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Supplementary protection certificates – Anti-retroviral medication – Validity – Combination of active ingredients – Construction of art. 3(a) of the SPC Regulation – Whether product “protected by the basic patent in force” – Whether extent of protection the relevant test – Issue referred to Court of Justice – Interpretation and application of judgment of Court of Justice – Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132590827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}