{"title":"AKEBIA THERAPEUTICS INC v FIBROGEN, INC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Patents – European patents – Pharmaceuticals – Treatment of anaemia – Revocation – Infringement – Construction – Obviousness – Obvious to try – Reasonable expectation of success – Hindsight – Expert evidence – Sequential unmasking – Insufficiency – Excessive claim breadth – Uncertainty – Identification of technical contribution – Principles of general application – Plausibility – Undue burden – AgrEvo obviousness – Equivalence – File prosecution history – Process limited product claims – Indirect infringement – Means relating to an essential element of the invention – Whether suitable for putting and intended to put invention into effect – “Off-label” use – State of mind of defendants – Intentions of prescribing clinicians – Quia timet claims – Whether stay of infringement claim appropriate","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
H1 Patents – European patents – Pharmaceuticals – Treatment of anaemia – Revocation – Infringement – Construction – Obviousness – Obvious to try – Reasonable expectation of success – Hindsight – Expert evidence – Sequential unmasking – Insufficiency – Excessive claim breadth – Uncertainty – Identification of technical contribution – Principles of general application – Plausibility – Undue burden – AgrEvo obviousness – Equivalence – File prosecution history – Process limited product claims – Indirect infringement – Means relating to an essential element of the invention – Whether suitable for putting and intended to put invention into effect – “Off-label” use – State of mind of defendants – Intentions of prescribing clinicians – Quia timet claims – Whether stay of infringement claim appropriate
H1专利-欧洲专利-药品-治疗贫血-撤销-侵权-构建-显而易见-显而易见的尝试-合理的成功预期-后见之明-专家证据-顺序揭露-不足-过度的权利要求广度-不确定性-技术贡献的识别-一般适用原则-合理性-不当负担- AgrEvo显而易见性-等效-提交起诉历史-过程有限的产品权利要求-间接侵权-与发明的基本要素有关的手段-是否适合实施和打算实施发明-“标签外”使用-被告的心理状态-开处方的临床医生的意图- Quia time索赔-侵权索赔的中止是否适当