Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v ASUSTEK COMPUTER INCORPORATION KONINKLIJKE飞利浦公司诉华硕电脑公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcaa018
{"title":"KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v ASUSTEK COMPUTER INCORPORATION","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcaa018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcaa018","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – European patents – Standards essential patents – Technical trials – Obviousness – The skilled person – Common general knowledge – Mindset – “Lions in the path” – The relevance of commercial considerations – Hindsight – Secondary evidence – Essentiality – Construction – Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126959952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WARNER MUSIC UK LTD v TUNEIN INC 华纳音乐英国有限公司诉TUNEIN公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/RPC/RCAA015
Chancery Division
{"title":"WARNER MUSIC UK LTD v TUNEIN INC","authors":"Chancery Division","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA015","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Copyright – Infringement – Sound recordings – Internet radio services – Hyperlinks – Targeting – Communication to the public – Whether communication to the public in the UK – Consent – Whether the UK public was a new public – Freedom of information – Freedom of expression – Availability of a recording facility – Liability of users – Time shifting – Liability of station providers – Authorisation – Safe harbours","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125953415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD v SANDOZ LTD 葛兰素威康英国有限公司诉山德士有限公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/RPC/RCAA008
Chancery Division
{"title":"GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD v SANDOZ LTD","authors":"Chancery Division","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA008","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Passing off – Prescription medication – Asthma inhalers – The colour purple – Distinctiveness – Misrepresentation as to source – Misrepresentation as to equivalence – Likelihood of confusion – Survey evidence – Damage – Recklessness – Joint tortfeasance","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115864359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Omega Flex Ltd v British Standards Institution 欧米茄Flex有限公司诉英国标准协会
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-10-23 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcz026
{"title":"Omega Flex Ltd v British Standards Institution","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcz026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcz026","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks – Invalidation proceedings – Certification marks - Indications of quality - British Standards kitemark – Application for registration as a ordinary trade mark - Capacity to distinguish - Whether devoid of distinctive character – Relevance of pre-application use - Perception of the relevant public as at date of filing - Whether serving as a badge of origin – Whether descriptive of characteristics of goods or services - Whether distinctiveness acquired through use - Public policy – Deceptive marks - Bad faith –– Lack of intention to use as indicator of origin across full width of specification – Partial invalidity - Reference to CJEU ongoing in other proceedings","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123685535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SHANKS v UNILEVER PLC (NO. 2) 尚克斯诉联合利华(UNILEVER PLC)案;2)
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcaa012
{"title":"SHANKS v UNILEVER PLC (NO. 2)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcaa012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcaa012","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Patents – Employee inventions – Compensation – Patents exploited by licensing – Statutory construction – Meaning of “the benefit of which the employer has derived … from the patent” – Whether corporation tax to be deducted – Whether benefit outstanding – Identification of employer’s undertaking – Assessment of fair share for employee – Relevance of the time value of money – Appeal to Supreme Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132628823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TAKEDA UK LTD v F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG 武田英国有限公司诉罗氏公司案
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/RPC/RCAA007
Patents Court
{"title":"TAKEDA UK LTD v F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG","authors":"Patents Court","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCAA007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCAA007","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Patents – European patents – Revocation proceedings – Pharmaceuticals – Antibodies – Validity – Infringement – Construction – Numerical ranges – “at least 99%” – Novelty – Disclosure – Enablement – Obviousness – Lack of technical contribution – Hindsight – Insufficiency – Ambiguity – Fuzzy boundaries","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132338270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH v SERVIER LABORATORIES LTD 卫生大臣诉施维雅实验室有限公司案
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcaa004
{"title":"SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH v SERVIER LABORATORIES LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcaa004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcaa004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – European patents - Pharmaceuticals – Generic products – Economic torts – Unlawful means – Strike out application – Necessary elements of the tort – Whether the unlawful means relied upon had to interfere with claimant’s liberty to deal with third party against whom the unlawful act relied upon had been committed – Invalid patents – Proceedings for patent infringement – Interim injunctions – Market entry of third party generic product delayed – Prices thereby maintained – Patent later invalidated – Claim struck out at first instance – Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129821659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DREAMERSCLUB LTD’S TRADE MARK APPLICATION 梦想俱乐部有限公司的商标申请
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcaa001
Appointed Person
{"title":"DREAMERSCLUB LTD’S TRADE MARK APPLICATION","authors":"Appointed Person","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcaa001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcaa001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade marks – Opposition proceedings – Earlier marks – Proof of use – Word marks – Stylised script – Whether used in a form altering distinctive character – Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115581217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WOOF AND BREW LTD’S TRADE MARK APPLICATION 沃夫啤酒有限公司的商标申请
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcaa006
{"title":"WOOF AND BREW LTD’S TRADE MARK APPLICATION","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcaa006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcaa006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Trade Marks – Opposition proceedings – PAWSECCO – Edible pet treats – Pet beverages – Whether use in the UK prohibited by any enactment or provision of EU law – Protected denominations of origin – PROSECCO – Scope of protection – Assessing evocation – Surrounding context – Circumstances suggestion visual and phonetic similarities not fortuitous – Freedom of speech – Parody defences – Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125917743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
E. MISHAN & SONS, INC (T/A EMSON) v HOZELOCK LTD 米山父子公司(T/A EMSON)诉HOZELOCK有限公司
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/rpc/rcaa002
Patents Court
{"title":"E. MISHAN & SONS, INC (T/A EMSON) v HOZELOCK LTD","authors":"Patents Court","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcaa002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcaa002","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Patents – European Patents – Expandable garden hoses – Infringement – Validity – Person skilled in the art – Common general knowledge – Construction – Whether tubes “unattached” between “couplers” – Meaning of “non-elastic” – Equivalents – Obviousness – Prior user – Inventor working in front garden – Whether what was visible was made available to the public – Commercial success – Burden of proof – Priority – “Formstein” defences","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129234070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书