博世公司诉博世品牌英国有限公司

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1093/rpc/rcac003

{"title":"博世公司诉博世品牌英国有限公司","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Trade marks — Opposition proceedings — BOSCO plus device — Comparison of five-letter marks — “Short” marks — Likelihood of confusion — Service marks — Interpretation of specifications of services — Retail services — Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROBERT BOSCH GMBH v BOSCO BRANDS UK LTD\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpc/rcac003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n H1 Trade marks — Opposition proceedings — BOSCO plus device — Comparison of five-letter marks — “Short” marks — Likelihood of confusion — Service marks — Interpretation of specifications of services — Retail services — Appeal to Appointed Person\",\"PeriodicalId\":336842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

H1商标-异议程序- BOSCO加装置-五个字母标记的比较-“短”标记-混淆的可能性-服务标记-服务规范的解释-零售服务-向指定人员提出上诉

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

ROBERT BOSCH GMBH v BOSCO BRANDS UK LTD

H1 Trade marks — Opposition proceedings — BOSCO plus device — Comparison of five-letter marks — “Short” marks — Likelihood of confusion — Service marks — Interpretation of specifications of services — Retail services — Appeal to Appointed Person

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases

自引率

0.00%

发文量