PUMA SE诉NIKE INNOVATE C.V.

{"title":"PUMA SE诉NIKE INNOVATE C.V.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Trade marks—Opposition proceedings—FOOTWARE—Registrability—Descriptiveness—Mis-spelling—Neologisms—Computer software—Cloud computing services—Telecommunications—Appeal to High Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PUMA SE v NIKE INNOVATE C.V.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpc/rcac040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n H1 Trade marks—Opposition proceedings—FOOTWARE—Registrability—Descriptiveness—Mis-spelling—Neologisms—Computer software—Cloud computing services—Telecommunications—Appeal to High Court\",\"PeriodicalId\":336842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

H1商标-异议程序-鞋类-可注册性-描述性-拼写错误-新词-计算机软件-云计算服务-电信-高等法院上诉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PUMA SE v NIKE INNOVATE C.V.
H1 Trade marks—Opposition proceedings—FOOTWARE—Registrability—Descriptiveness—Mis-spelling—Neologisms—Computer software—Cloud computing services—Telecommunications—Appeal to High Court
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信