SKY LTD (FORMERLY SKY PLC) v SKYKICK UK LTD (No. 4)

{"title":"SKY LTD (FORMERLY SKY PLC) v SKYKICK UK LTD (No. 4)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcab025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Trade Marks — European trade marks — SKY — Validity — Broad specifications of goods and services — Bad faith — Requirement of clarity and precision — Lack of bona fide intention to use — Declarations of intention to use — “Computer software” — Partial validity — Case management — “Electronic mail services” — Infringement — Likelihood of confusion — Lack of evidence of confusion — Whether necessary to consider all alleged acts of infringement — Passing off — Application of the judgment on reference to Court of Justice — Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcab025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

H1 Trade Marks — European trade marks — SKY — Validity — Broad specifications of goods and services — Bad faith — Requirement of clarity and precision — Lack of bona fide intention to use — Declarations of intention to use — “Computer software” — Partial validity — Case management — “Electronic mail services” — Infringement — Likelihood of confusion — Lack of evidence of confusion — Whether necessary to consider all alleged acts of infringement — Passing off — Application of the judgment on reference to Court of Justice — Appeal to Court of Appeal
SKY LTD(原SKY PLC)诉SKYKICK UK LTD(第4名)
H1商标-欧洲商标——天空有效性-广泛的商品和服务规范——恶意的要求清晰和精确——缺乏善意的意图使用声明的意图使用-“计算机软件”部分有效性-病例管理-“电子邮件服务”侵权混淆的可能性——缺乏证据的困惑——是否需要考虑所有涉嫌侵权,假冒行为转介法院的判决的适用-向上诉法院提出上诉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信