Environmental Science & Policy最新文献

{"title":"The pluriverses of conservation: Exploring modes of coexistence and more-than-human care for alternative socioecological futures","authors":"Gustavo Blanco-Wells ,&nbsp;Marcela Márquez-García","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104277","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104277","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of socio-ecological and climate crises, the global challenges for biodiversity conservation are enormous. These challenges are addressed through a range of conservation regulations, programs, and initiatives stemming from both the public and private sectors.</div><div>This perspective proposes focusing on the \"<em>pluriverses of conservation</em>\", understood as the diverse modes of attention and care deployed among different entities in a more-than-human world. We believe these caring relationships are expressed with vitality in interactions between conservation organizations and both human and non-human communities in places undergoing critical dynamics of capitalist transformation.</div><div>We recognize that forests, fungi, mammals, birds, insects, lichens and other entities are not reducible solely to the field of conservation. Nonetheless, conservation offers a privileged advantage to investigate an epistemological shift—from modes of knowing (epistemologies) toward modes of existing (ontologies)—and, from there, to modes of attention toward more-than-humans inspiring current conservation processes in many parts of the world.</div><div>Drawing on posthumanist theories, transdisciplinary methodologies, and long-term ethnographic research in the Southern Cone of South America, the article introduces the Transdisciplinary Field Laboratories—experiential spaces where diverse knowledges and practices intersect to foster multispecies relationships and innovative conservation approaches. These laboratories exemplify how conservation initiatives can challenge anthropocentric perspectives, opening pathways toward alternative socio-ecological futures grounded in multispecies justice. We argue that such modes of coexistence and care, facilitated through these collaborative spaces, embody alternative ways of relating to biodiversity beyond dominant Western paradigms, ultimately contributing to more inclusive, just, and sustainable approaches to conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104277"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145734515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Flood risk and land-use governance in Quebec, Canada: Fifty years of crises and institutional reform","authors":"Marilyne Gaudette ,&nbsp;Daniel Germain","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104295","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104295","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past fifty years, Quebec’s flood risk governance has undergone successive reforms driven by major disasters, from the floods of 1974 and 1976 to those of 2017 and 2019. Drawing on legislative archives, policy documents, cartographic records, and media sources, this paper reconstructs how these critical junctures reshaped institutions, from the first Canada-Quebec floodplain agreements to the recent transitional regime and forthcoming third-generation maps. Using a historical institutionalist framework combined with insights from political ecology, we examine how crises have acted as catalysts for reform while also reinforcing path dependencies. Early hazard-based approaches focused on probabilistic mapping and infrastructure defence, while later initiatives introduced land-use restrictions, standardized cartographic methods, and eventually risk-based models integrating hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. Recent reforms further expand this scope to include adaptation and river mobility, supported by high-resolution LiDAR mapping and watershed-scale planning. Yet major challenges persist, including regulatory rigidity, tensions between provincial norms and local contexts, and uneven attention to social vulnerability, even if ongoing reforms begin to address some of these gaps. Through a political ecology lens, these shifts reveal how regulatory change intersects with power, equity, and knowledge: who defines risk, whose expertise prevails, and how costs and restrictions are distributed across territories. Quebec’s evolving trajectory highlights both the opportunities and limits of event-driven reform while disasters accelerate innovation, they can also entrench uneven governance outcomes. By situating Quebec within broader debates on adaptive risk governance and resilience, this study offers transferable lessons for jurisdictions facing climate-induced flood risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104295"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145734530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What is there to sustain? Ontological imaginaries and the existence and agency of gods, Tūpuna, and everything else","authors":"Linde Draaisma ,&nbsp;Stewart Lockie","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104297","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104297","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainability science looks at who and what can continue to exist into the future. To do so, it must also grapple with ontological questions about what and who currently exists. Whereas people’s worlds are inhabited by vastly different entities and relationships, it is often only the entities that exist in dominant, science-based realities that are discussed in environmental research and policy. In such cases, a separation between objectivity and subjectivity particular to post-Enlightenment thought disqualifies entities like gods and spirits from serious consideration. We argue that gasses, temperatures, gods and angels can all play important roles in the origins, consequences and resolution of environmental issues. However, a practical way of conceptualising and investigating the wide variety of entities that exist is needed. To that end, we introduce the concept of ontological imaginaries and explain how this can be incorporated into research. Ontological imaginaries describe and prescribe the entities and relationships that exist for people. They recognize reality to be multiple and enacted, thus rejecting the premise of a singular and objective truth. Ontological imaginaries embody diversity, transformation and multiplicity and are therefore well equipped to capture the dynamic and often messy nature of people’s realities. By recognizing the existence and agency of gods, <em>Tūpuna</em> (ancestors) and everything else that exists, the concept \"ontological imaginaries\" can provide a tool for engaging with ontological multiplicity in environmental science.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104297"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145787100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unlearning through spirituality: Mongolian and Western animistic traditions as pathways to enhance sustainability","authors":"Jesse Segura ,&nbsp;Julien-François Gerber ,&nbsp;Filka Sekulova","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104296","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104296","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores how animistic rituals—specifically the ovoo offering in Inner Mongolia—can serve as embodied engagements with what Roy Bhaskar (1975) calls the “real”: a deeper layer of reality shaped by unseen causal and spiritual forces. By acknowledging the 'inhabitants' of this deeper layer, we contribute to the broader post-humanist, or more-than-human, turn in the social sciences and humanities. Using a sensory collaborative autoethnographic approach, we take the ovoo encounter as a point of departure to examine our own onto-epistemic assumptions and to build a conceptual bridge for Western-trained audiences to loosen the grip of empirical-positivist habits of thought. We show how these practices enact a relational ontology that disrupts capitalist modernity’s extractivist, anthropocentric, and dualistic assumptions. We argue that, for those embedded in Western knowledge systems, openness to such place-based spiritual practices can foster the unlearning of dominant colonial-capitalist ways of being. The paper’s contribution is twofold: first, it demonstrates how engaging with the ovoo offering nurtures reciprocal, embodied connections that unsettle anthropocentric and dualistic worldviews; and second, it highlights how animistic traditions can counter the mechanistic cosmologies underlying extractivism. Such encounters can help reawaken suppressed spiritual lineages within Western thought, expanding the ethical and affective horizons of sustainability. At the same time, we remain attentive to the risks of co-optation through commodification, tourism, or detached New Age reinterpretations. We conclude by situating these reflections within wider debates on sustainability, ecological justice, and relational ethics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104296"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145734518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Analysis of water governance in the Nekarud River Basin and Eastern Mazandaran plains, Iran: Challenges and recommendations","authors":"Hossein Shakeri Rostami ,&nbsp;Hosseinali Zabardast Rostami","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104293","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104293","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Nekarud River Basin in northern Iran exemplifies the growing challenges of water governance in regions where hydrological complexity, agricultural dependence, and institutional fragmentation converge. Although not among the country’s largest basins, its mountain-to-plain structure, intensive agricultural activities, and direct connection to the Caspian Sea make it highly vulnerable to groundwater depletion, surface water stress, and competing sectoral demands. These characteristics render it an appropriate case for examining how governance structures can address emerging conflicts in water management. The objective of this study is to identify and analyze the systemic drivers of water governance challenges in the river basin and to propose Suggestions that enhance policy coherence across the water, food, and energy sectors. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining document analysis, semi-structured interviews, expert questionnaires, and stakeholder mapping through a power–interest matrix. The DPSIR framework was used to assess interconnected drivers and pressures shaping water stress, while the integration of social perspectives provided insights into local dynamics often overlooked in formal planning. The results indicate that uncontrolled groundwater extraction, particularly through illegal wells, represents the most significant quantitative challenge. Social factors such as limited awareness, weak institutional capacity, and insufficient adoption of water-saving technologies further aggravate water governance challenges. Moreover, discrepancies between expert assessments and local community perceptions reveal a critical gap that undermines the legitimacy and effectiveness of water policies. This study highlights the necessity of strengthening inter-sectoral coordination, fostering participatory governance mechanisms, and promoting integrated Water–Energy–Food actions. By applying a combined analytical framework that links system-based assessment with stakeholder perspectives, the research provides both contextual insights for the Nekarud River Basin and offers a transferable integrated analytical approach that can be applied other socio-ecological systems facing similar governance complexities in the world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104293"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145683314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Navigating uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for novel entities: The case of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and its precursors","authors":"Jakob Kramer ,&nbsp;Jens Lange ,&nbsp;Jule Lichtner ,&nbsp;Michael Müller ,&nbsp;Sylvia Kruse","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104299","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104299","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regulatory decision-making for novel entities such as trifluoroacetic acid, respectively trifluoroacetate (TFA), involves multiple forms of uncertainty. This paper applies a typology that structures uncertainty along two dimensions: types of uncertainty (epistemological, ontological, and ambiguity) and objects of uncertainty (substantive, strategic, and institutional). We argue that three key substantive features of TFA, its large number of precursors, its extreme environmental persistence, and its global mobility, do not only shape substantive uncertainties about its properties, effects, and mitigation, but also amplify strategic and institutional uncertainties. Specifically, the wide and fragmented network of actors involved in TFA’s regulation across sectors (e.g., water, pesticides) creates diffuse responsibilities and complicates coordination. TFA’s persistence intensifies ontological uncertainties, as continuous and potentially irreversible exposure renders some long-term impacts effectively unknowable within relevant policy timeframes. Its mobility challenges regulatory systems that are spatially and institutionally bound. Importantly, we show how regulatory outcomes are shaped not only by substantive or institutional challenges but also by competing actor framings and power asymmetries, as actors strategically influence how regulatory uncertainties are defined and addressed. These findings are not just relevant for TFA regulation, but also for the broader group of novel entities where regulatory decision-making depends on measures such as emission reduction, improved input control, increased regulatory transparency, and sensitivity to power asymmetries. We propose that the applied typology can serve as a boundary object to foster interdisciplinary dialogue in environmental governance, bridging distinct philosophical and disciplinary perspectives while remaining sufficiently open to accommodate different conceptual and disciplinary framings of uncertainty. The applied typology shows how different types and objects of uncertainty interact in decision-making around novel entities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104299"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145787102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity (ESAc) to water, energy, and food (WEF) insecurity in the midst of misgovernance and social injustice: A reflection from South Africa","authors":"Saul Ngarava","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104301","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104301","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study sought to identify the level and interaction of vulnerabilities to water, energy, and food (WEF) misgovernance, social injustice and insecurity, conceptualized through exposure, sensitivity and adaptative capacity. The study was carried out in Matatiele, Magareng and Greater Taung Local Municipalities, South Africa. Multi-stage purposive sampling was used to get a sample of 1184 households through semi-structured questionnaires in a cross-sectional survey. A vulnerability index, Monte Carlo Simulations and Structural Equation Modelling were used to analyse the data. The results showed high exposure to WEF misgovernance and high sensitivity to WEF social injustice, which resulted in high and low vulnerability to WEF misgovernance and social injustice, respectively. In addition, various levels of vulnerability to WEF social injustice had interaction with vulnerability to misgovernance and insecurities, respectively. Furthermore, there was a higher probability of experiencing vulnerability to WEF misgovernance than social injustice. However, there was a reinforcing positive association between vulnerabilities to WEF misgovernance and social injustice. In conclusion, there is a reinforcing association between experiencing vulnerability to WEF misgovernance and social injustice, which is also associated with vulnerability to water insecurity. However, vulnerabilities to social injustice counteract vulnerabilities to energy and food insecurity. The study recommends improving awareness on issues of misgovernance and social injustice at the household and community level. There is a need to incentivize participation in community forums and expand their composition to accommodate various social groups and classes. Policymakers also need to provide spatial and temporal-based indigent support to alleviate WEF insecurities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104301"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145837412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Designing a rapid response process for urgent policy-relevant knowledge needs: A case study on deadwood and forest fires","authors":"R. Dianoux ,&nbsp;L. Brotons ,&nbsp;S. Corticeiro ,&nbsp;J.-C. Dajka ,&nbsp;U. Jacob ,&nbsp;K. Korhonen-Kurki ,&nbsp;M. Larjavaara ,&nbsp;K. Locher-Krause ,&nbsp;A.B. Leverkus ,&nbsp;P. Maia ,&nbsp;T.G.M. Sanders ,&nbsp;M. Vandewalle ,&nbsp;H. Wittmer ,&nbsp;J. Young","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104303","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104303","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The dynamic nature of policy processes creates urgent knowledge needs that may not align with typical timelines of scientific research and knowledge synthesis. Faced with these time constraints, policy-makers resort to ad-hoc strategies to make decisions or resolve disputes, compromising the quality of evidence-based policy. As part of a project, we addressed this challenge by developing and testing a structured process for responding to urgent knowledge needs while maintaining scientific rigor. This process was tested in April 2023 through a knowledge-synthesis on the relationship between deadwood and fire risk in European forests, delivering evidence for ongoing EU Nature Restoration Law policy discussions. A targeted group of experts delivered a report within six weeks of initial request, following a scoping and engagement process. In this paper, we evaluate the context and outcomes of this rapid response process, prompting reflection on conditions necessary to respond in a timely manner. Our analysis reveals key challenges: knowledge production constraints, barriers to diverse expertise mobilization, limited transformative potential, science-policy interface tensions, specific ethical risks. To address these challenges, we identify four key requirements for rapid response processes: (1) sustained science-policy dialogue to clarify urgent needs and their context, (2) structured systems for accessing existing research, (3) incentivized expert engagement with clear participation pathways, (4) robust ethical oversight that maintains scientific integrity while acknowledging limitations. These requirements provide a foundation for developing ethically grounded, sustainable science-policy interactions that balance rigor with responsiveness, incorporate diverse knowledge systems, and enhance transformative potential across different contexts and scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104303"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145837411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"(De)constructing meanings and pathways of water and peace","authors":"Laura Turley ,&nbsp;Christian Bréthaut ,&nbsp;Sumit Vij ,&nbsp;Quentin Parent ,&nbsp;Aline Wambüi Stüdeli ,&nbsp;Irene Fiammetta Muscas","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104270","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104270","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water as an entry point for peace is increasingly highlighted in global policy discourse; however, the scientific evidence supporting this connection has not been systematically established or explored, in contrast to the extensive literature on water and conflict. This systematic review examines the literature on the relationship between water and peace from 2015 to 2022, utilizing the ROSES methodology for systematic reviews. Our findings indicate that while conceptual advances and empirical evidence demonstrate that water can serve as a vector for broader peace, this knowledge is dispersed across various epistemic communities, hindering the systematic accumulation of insights. To address this fragmentation, we unpack the different meanings of and linkages between water and peace and identify seven water-to-peace ‘pathways’ from an inductive analysis of the literature. We propose that the pathways can provide structure and shared language for future research on water and peace, aimed at fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and enhancing understanding of this critical relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 104270"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A multidisciplinary framework for research prioritization at the science-policy interface: Insights for wildlife conservation and management","authors":"Nikol Damato ,&nbsp;Alex McInturff","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104279","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104279","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>At the science-policy interface for wildlife conservation, numerous barriers prevent the integration of science into policy, and decision-makers must make tradeoffs between investing in research and implementing management interventions based on existing but limited information. The consequences of these decisions are particularly high for “wicked” problems like endangered species management, where there is often urgency, uncertainty, conflict, and irreversible and potentially harmful outcomes for both wildlife and human communities. As a result, there is growing recognition about the need to strategically prioritize research that effectively reduces uncertainty, is relevant to decision-makers, and improves management outcomes. We conducted a narrative literature review of the wildlife conservation sciences, the decision sciences, and the policy sciences to synthesize insights and best practices for research prioritization and meet a critical need for integrating social dimensions into prioritization decisions. Our goal was to develop an accessible framework to help decision-makers and natural and social scientists make more effective, defensible, and just decisions about research priorities. We propose four categories of considerations scientists and decision-makers can take into account in prioritization decisions: (1) the source, reducibility, and relevance of uncertainties, (2) practical and socio-political feasibility, (3) conflict and contestation, and (4) direct and indirect risk perceptions. We offer strategies and tools to operationalize and adapt the framework across management contexts and needs. We draw on examples from endangered Southern Resident killer whales (<em>Orcinus orca</em>) to provide insight into how decision-makers and scientists can apply the framework’s considerations within their unique social-ecological systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 104279"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145577101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}