Anticipating ecological transformation in the Coorong, Australia: Capacities and knowledge for upstream engagement

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Carla Alexandra
{"title":"Anticipating ecological transformation in the Coorong, Australia: Capacities and knowledge for upstream engagement","authors":"Carla Alexandra","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change and other anthropogenic stressors are leading to directional changes in ecosystems, making ecological transformations more likely. The need to anticipate and proactively plan for ecological transformation is increasingly recognised. Yet, how change is anticipated and who is involved in foresight processes can shape how ecological transformation is governed and managed. Research has proposed foresight processes to engage stakeholders about ecological transformation. However, empirical research is needed to provide insights into the opportunities and challenges of using foresight in contexts of ecological transformation. This research develops insights on <em>anticipatory capacities</em> and <em>futures knowledge</em> for decision-making about adapting to prospective ecological transformation, drawing on a case study from the Ramsar-listed Coorong region (<em>Yarluwar-Ruwe</em>) in South Australia. It builds on anticipatory governance literature and the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) climate adaptation framework, to understand anticipatory capacities required for <em>upstream engagement</em> on prospective ecological transformation. Findings highlight key anticipatory capacities are a) accepting transformative change is inevitable, b) addressing emotional responses, c) navigating changing values, and d) navigating the politics of anticipation. Anticipatory governance of ecological transformation requires capacities to engage stakeholders on social, political, and emotional dimensions of change. This research highlights the paradoxical nature of futures knowledge, balancing credibility with subjectivity. It underscores the vital role of emotional dimensions in responding to ecological transformation. Upstream engagement that applies foresight to anticipate ecological transformation is needed to support people through anticipatory loss and grief, towards facilitating agency in a changed future. The findings offer insights into anticipatory governance in Australia and internationally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change and other anthropogenic stressors are leading to directional changes in ecosystems, making ecological transformations more likely. The need to anticipate and proactively plan for ecological transformation is increasingly recognised. Yet, how change is anticipated and who is involved in foresight processes can shape how ecological transformation is governed and managed. Research has proposed foresight processes to engage stakeholders about ecological transformation. However, empirical research is needed to provide insights into the opportunities and challenges of using foresight in contexts of ecological transformation. This research develops insights on anticipatory capacities and futures knowledge for decision-making about adapting to prospective ecological transformation, drawing on a case study from the Ramsar-listed Coorong region (Yarluwar-Ruwe) in South Australia. It builds on anticipatory governance literature and the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) climate adaptation framework, to understand anticipatory capacities required for upstream engagement on prospective ecological transformation. Findings highlight key anticipatory capacities are a) accepting transformative change is inevitable, b) addressing emotional responses, c) navigating changing values, and d) navigating the politics of anticipation. Anticipatory governance of ecological transformation requires capacities to engage stakeholders on social, political, and emotional dimensions of change. This research highlights the paradoxical nature of futures knowledge, balancing credibility with subjectivity. It underscores the vital role of emotional dimensions in responding to ecological transformation. Upstream engagement that applies foresight to anticipate ecological transformation is needed to support people through anticipatory loss and grief, towards facilitating agency in a changed future. The findings offer insights into anticipatory governance in Australia and internationally.
预测澳大利亚库荣的生态转型:上游参与的能力和知识
气候变化和其他人为压力因素正在导致生态系统的方向性变化,使生态转型更有可能。越来越多的人认识到预见和积极规划生态转型的必要性。然而,如何预测变化以及谁参与预测过程可以决定如何治理和管理生态转型。研究提出了前瞻性流程,以吸引利益相关者参与生态转型。然而,在生态转型背景下运用前瞻的机遇和挑战还有待于实证研究。本研究以南澳大利亚拉姆萨尔上市的库荣地区(Yarluwar-Ruwe)为例,对适应未来生态转型的决策的预期能力和未来知识进行了深入研究。它建立在预期治理文献和抵制-接受-直接(RAD)气候适应框架的基础上,以了解上游参与预期生态转型所需的预期能力。研究结果强调了关键的预期能力:a)接受不可避免的变革,b)处理情绪反应,c)驾驭不断变化的价值观,d)驾驭预期政治。生态转型的预期治理需要有能力让利益相关者参与变革的社会、政治和情感层面。这项研究突出了期货知识的矛盾本质,平衡了可信性和主观性。它强调了情感维度在应对生态转型中的重要作用。需要运用前瞻性来预测生态转型的上游参与,以支持人们通过预期的损失和悲伤,促进在变化的未来中的代理。这些发现为澳大利亚和国际上的预期治理提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信