公民科学在政策中的主流化:五个欧洲国家在政策中需要的适应以及如何实现它们

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Katharina Hölscher , Julia M. Wittmayer , V. Igno Notermans , Madeleine Cléa Montanari , Antonella Passani , Annelli Janssen
{"title":"公民科学在政策中的主流化:五个欧洲国家在政策中需要的适应以及如何实现它们","authors":"Katharina Hölscher ,&nbsp;Julia M. Wittmayer ,&nbsp;V. Igno Notermans ,&nbsp;Madeleine Cléa Montanari ,&nbsp;Antonella Passani ,&nbsp;Annelli Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The potential of citizen science remains underutilised in conventional policy practice for various reasons – a compelling one being that the policy system itself must adapt to leverage this potential. This paper aims to explore what mainstreaming citizen science in policy entails and how it can be realised. We define mainstreaming as the ongoing, incremental processes of creating and re-forming the institutional conditions that enable policy-making to operationalise and incorporate citizen science. We focus on identifying 1) the contributions of citizen science to policy-making and the challenges for leveraging these contributions, and 2) mainstreaming strategies to create the institutional conditions that enable the uptake of citizen science in environmental policy. Through case studies conducted in five European countries (Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom), we generate contextualised and synthesised insights across different policy contexts. Our findings highlight the potential of mainstreaming citizen science to enhance environmental policy-making, enabling it to address complex societal challenges more effectively and equitably. Citizen science marks new modalities of public engagement, which change the roles and relations between policy-makers, scientists and citizens, shifting these towards becoming collaborators and co-creators. This requires also changing the processes by which policy problems and solutions are defined, implemented and monitored, as well as the underlying structures and resources that support the uptake of such processes by policy-makers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104148"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mainstreaming citizen science in policy: Adaptations needed in policy and how to achieve them in five European countries\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Hölscher ,&nbsp;Julia M. Wittmayer ,&nbsp;V. Igno Notermans ,&nbsp;Madeleine Cléa Montanari ,&nbsp;Antonella Passani ,&nbsp;Annelli Janssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The potential of citizen science remains underutilised in conventional policy practice for various reasons – a compelling one being that the policy system itself must adapt to leverage this potential. This paper aims to explore what mainstreaming citizen science in policy entails and how it can be realised. We define mainstreaming as the ongoing, incremental processes of creating and re-forming the institutional conditions that enable policy-making to operationalise and incorporate citizen science. We focus on identifying 1) the contributions of citizen science to policy-making and the challenges for leveraging these contributions, and 2) mainstreaming strategies to create the institutional conditions that enable the uptake of citizen science in environmental policy. Through case studies conducted in five European countries (Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom), we generate contextualised and synthesised insights across different policy contexts. Our findings highlight the potential of mainstreaming citizen science to enhance environmental policy-making, enabling it to address complex societal challenges more effectively and equitably. Citizen science marks new modalities of public engagement, which change the roles and relations between policy-makers, scientists and citizens, shifting these towards becoming collaborators and co-creators. This requires also changing the processes by which policy problems and solutions are defined, implemented and monitored, as well as the underlying structures and resources that support the uptake of such processes by policy-makers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001649\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于各种原因,公民科学的潜力在传统的政策实践中仍然没有得到充分利用——一个令人信服的原因是,政策体系本身必须适应以利用这种潜力。本文旨在探讨公民科学在政策中的主流化需要什么,以及如何实现。我们将主流化定义为创造和改革制度条件的持续的、渐进的过程,这些制度条件使政策制定能够运作并纳入公民科学。我们的重点是确定1)公民科学对政策制定的贡献以及利用这些贡献所面临的挑战,以及2)将战略主流化,以创造能够将公民科学纳入环境政策的制度条件。通过在五个欧洲国家(意大利、荷兰、挪威、西班牙和英国)进行的案例研究,我们在不同的政策背景下产生情境化和综合的见解。我们的研究结果突出了将公民科学主流化以加强环境决策的潜力,使其能够更有效和公平地解决复杂的社会挑战。公民科学标志着公众参与的新模式,它改变了决策者、科学家和公民之间的角色和关系,使他们成为合作者和共同创造者。这还需要改变界定、执行和监测政策问题和解决办法的过程,以及支持决策者采用这些过程的基础结构和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mainstreaming citizen science in policy: Adaptations needed in policy and how to achieve them in five European countries
The potential of citizen science remains underutilised in conventional policy practice for various reasons – a compelling one being that the policy system itself must adapt to leverage this potential. This paper aims to explore what mainstreaming citizen science in policy entails and how it can be realised. We define mainstreaming as the ongoing, incremental processes of creating and re-forming the institutional conditions that enable policy-making to operationalise and incorporate citizen science. We focus on identifying 1) the contributions of citizen science to policy-making and the challenges for leveraging these contributions, and 2) mainstreaming strategies to create the institutional conditions that enable the uptake of citizen science in environmental policy. Through case studies conducted in five European countries (Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom), we generate contextualised and synthesised insights across different policy contexts. Our findings highlight the potential of mainstreaming citizen science to enhance environmental policy-making, enabling it to address complex societal challenges more effectively and equitably. Citizen science marks new modalities of public engagement, which change the roles and relations between policy-makers, scientists and citizens, shifting these towards becoming collaborators and co-creators. This requires also changing the processes by which policy problems and solutions are defined, implemented and monitored, as well as the underlying structures and resources that support the uptake of such processes by policy-makers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信