{"title":"预测澳大利亚库荣的生态转型:上游参与的能力和知识","authors":"Carla Alexandra","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change and other anthropogenic stressors are leading to directional changes in ecosystems, making ecological transformations more likely. The need to anticipate and proactively plan for ecological transformation is increasingly recognised. Yet, how change is anticipated and who is involved in foresight processes can shape how ecological transformation is governed and managed. Research has proposed foresight processes to engage stakeholders about ecological transformation. However, empirical research is needed to provide insights into the opportunities and challenges of using foresight in contexts of ecological transformation. This research develops insights on <em>anticipatory capacities</em> and <em>futures knowledge</em> for decision-making about adapting to prospective ecological transformation, drawing on a case study from the Ramsar-listed Coorong region (<em>Yarluwar-Ruwe</em>) in South Australia. It builds on anticipatory governance literature and the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) climate adaptation framework, to understand anticipatory capacities required for <em>upstream engagement</em> on prospective ecological transformation. Findings highlight key anticipatory capacities are a) accepting transformative change is inevitable, b) addressing emotional responses, c) navigating changing values, and d) navigating the politics of anticipation. Anticipatory governance of ecological transformation requires capacities to engage stakeholders on social, political, and emotional dimensions of change. This research highlights the paradoxical nature of futures knowledge, balancing credibility with subjectivity. It underscores the vital role of emotional dimensions in responding to ecological transformation. Upstream engagement that applies foresight to anticipate ecological transformation is needed to support people through anticipatory loss and grief, towards facilitating agency in a changed future. The findings offer insights into anticipatory governance in Australia and internationally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticipating ecological transformation in the Coorong, Australia: Capacities and knowledge for upstream engagement\",\"authors\":\"Carla Alexandra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Climate change and other anthropogenic stressors are leading to directional changes in ecosystems, making ecological transformations more likely. The need to anticipate and proactively plan for ecological transformation is increasingly recognised. Yet, how change is anticipated and who is involved in foresight processes can shape how ecological transformation is governed and managed. Research has proposed foresight processes to engage stakeholders about ecological transformation. However, empirical research is needed to provide insights into the opportunities and challenges of using foresight in contexts of ecological transformation. This research develops insights on <em>anticipatory capacities</em> and <em>futures knowledge</em> for decision-making about adapting to prospective ecological transformation, drawing on a case study from the Ramsar-listed Coorong region (<em>Yarluwar-Ruwe</em>) in South Australia. It builds on anticipatory governance literature and the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) climate adaptation framework, to understand anticipatory capacities required for <em>upstream engagement</em> on prospective ecological transformation. Findings highlight key anticipatory capacities are a) accepting transformative change is inevitable, b) addressing emotional responses, c) navigating changing values, and d) navigating the politics of anticipation. Anticipatory governance of ecological transformation requires capacities to engage stakeholders on social, political, and emotional dimensions of change. This research highlights the paradoxical nature of futures knowledge, balancing credibility with subjectivity. It underscores the vital role of emotional dimensions in responding to ecological transformation. Upstream engagement that applies foresight to anticipate ecological transformation is needed to support people through anticipatory loss and grief, towards facilitating agency in a changed future. The findings offer insights into anticipatory governance in Australia and internationally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anticipating ecological transformation in the Coorong, Australia: Capacities and knowledge for upstream engagement
Climate change and other anthropogenic stressors are leading to directional changes in ecosystems, making ecological transformations more likely. The need to anticipate and proactively plan for ecological transformation is increasingly recognised. Yet, how change is anticipated and who is involved in foresight processes can shape how ecological transformation is governed and managed. Research has proposed foresight processes to engage stakeholders about ecological transformation. However, empirical research is needed to provide insights into the opportunities and challenges of using foresight in contexts of ecological transformation. This research develops insights on anticipatory capacities and futures knowledge for decision-making about adapting to prospective ecological transformation, drawing on a case study from the Ramsar-listed Coorong region (Yarluwar-Ruwe) in South Australia. It builds on anticipatory governance literature and the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) climate adaptation framework, to understand anticipatory capacities required for upstream engagement on prospective ecological transformation. Findings highlight key anticipatory capacities are a) accepting transformative change is inevitable, b) addressing emotional responses, c) navigating changing values, and d) navigating the politics of anticipation. Anticipatory governance of ecological transformation requires capacities to engage stakeholders on social, political, and emotional dimensions of change. This research highlights the paradoxical nature of futures knowledge, balancing credibility with subjectivity. It underscores the vital role of emotional dimensions in responding to ecological transformation. Upstream engagement that applies foresight to anticipate ecological transformation is needed to support people through anticipatory loss and grief, towards facilitating agency in a changed future. The findings offer insights into anticipatory governance in Australia and internationally.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.