Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters最新文献_第4页

Editor's Foreword: The Antioch Incident 编者前言:安提阿事件

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0137

S. E. Porter

引用次数: 0

Editor's Foreword 编辑前言

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0001

S. E. Porter

引用次数: 0

More Than a Gift: Revisiting Paul's Collection for Jerusalem and the Pilgrimage of Gentiles 不仅仅是一份礼物:重温保罗为耶路撒冷和外邦人朝圣的收藏

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0143

Samuel Auler

引用次数: 0

Paul the Rabbi of Messianic Judaism: Reading the Antioch Incident within Judaism as an Irreducibility Story 弥赛亚犹太教的拉比保罗:将犹太教中的安提阿事件解读为一个不可约的故事

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0225

J. Willitts

{"title":"Paul the Rabbi of Messianic Judaism: Reading the Antioch Incident within Judaism as an Irreducibility Story","authors":"J. Willitts","doi":"10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0225","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a reconsideration of the Antioch incident of Gal 2:11–21, arguing that Paul's issue with Peter and the Jewish believers in Jesus in Antioch was not theological, but halakhic, that is, how to live as a Messianic Jew particularly in relationship to Gentile Messiah believers. Paul's use of the story from his days in Antioch analogically served his purpose among Galatian Gentile Messiah-believers by both asserting his apostolic authority and by instructing them to resist any attempt to embrace an ethnically Jewish identity in Messiah. Such an interpretation of this significant Pauline crux derives from two factors. First, the study assumes that Paul was still firmly within the diverse Judaism of the late Second Temple period. Thus, the study considers the meaning of the Antioch incident within the framework of a “Paul within Judaism.” Second, the study applies narratology to the interpretation of Gal 2:11–21. Taking notice of the storied structure of the passage, consisting of a beginning, middle, and end, this article reads the parts of the story in relationship to the whole. The consequence of these two factors is (1) a plausible historical interpretation of the events of Antioch, albeit from Paul's perspective, and (2) a reading of the passage that is sensitive to its literary character.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68868163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Paul and the Ancient Body Metaphor: Reassesing Parallels 保罗和古代身体的隐喻:重新评估相似之处

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0075

Timothy A. Brookins

{"title":"Paul and the Ancient Body Metaphor: Reassesing Parallels","authors":"Timothy A. Brookins","doi":"10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0075","url":null,"abstract":"Paul's image of the church as the “body” of Christ in 1 Cor 12:12–26 has been traced back to a wide variety of social and religious contexts, including Gnosticism, the Jewish Scriptures, Second Temple Jewish thought, rabbinic Judaism, the Christian Eucharistic tradition, Paul's “conversion” experience, the teachings of Jesus, Stoicism, and more. Most recently, interpreters have emphasized the similarities between 1 Cor 12 and homonoia speeches associated with political rhetoric. Focusing on the closest parallels to Paul's text (one passage found in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and another found in the fragments of Hierocles the Stoic), I intend in this article to begin developing a theoretical framework within which to interpret the significance of these parallels to Paul's meaning. The article aims to counteract recent (over)emphasis on ancient cultural commonplaces as a precise matrix for interpreting Pauline parallels and challenges the attending tendency to drown out particularities in the “sea of generalities,” in preference of an explanatory model grounded more firmly in philosophical hermeneutics, the philosophy of language, and established principles in general and cognitive linguistics. The argument emphasizes the inherently “heteroglossic” (many-voiced) nature of any and all discourse, while at the same time emphasizing both the presence of “dominant” voices or echoes, made audible through historical context and linguistic “register,” and the inevitable transformation of language enacted in every new utterance, owing to the fundamentally dialogic and historically contingent nature of language and meaning. Thus, the meaning of Paul's “body” discourse emerges in a tension between a (primarily) Stoic field of reference and novel utterance.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68867628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

The Pursuit of Self-Control: Titus 2:1–14 and Accommodation to Christ 追求自制:提多书2:1-14和顺从基督

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0161

Sean Christensen

{"title":"The Pursuit of Self-Control: Titus 2:1–14 and Accommodation to Christ","authors":"Sean Christensen","doi":"10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0161","url":null,"abstract":"An attempt to account for the unique language and themes in the Pastoral Epistles presents distinct challenges for Pauline scholars. A specific example appears with the use of self-control (σώφρων) language in the book of Titus, where 5 of the 16 New Testament instances of this language appear in a brief section (2:1–14). Because of the prominence of this language in Greco-Roman ethical teaching, many have used this flurry of virtue language as an example of an accommodative Pauline ethic in Titus. This article tests this label of the accommodative ethic and ultimately cautions scholars against focusing singularly on the lexical similarities between Paul and his Greco-Roman counterparts without adequately accounting for the distinctives in the way the lexical items are used in Titus. This article shows that the ethics conveyed by the frequent use of σώφρων terminology in Titus 2:1–14 cannot properly be labeled accommodative in light of the stark differences that the text exhibits from common Greco-Roman concepts for the purpose and source of self-control. Instead, these factors suggest that, while mission remains of paramount importance to the ethical exhortation in Titus 2:1–14, the use of σώφρων terms supports a different ideology, prioritizing the gospel and union with Jesus Christ.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68867452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Paul Completes the Servant's Sufferings (Colossians 1:24) 保罗完成了仆人的苦难(歌罗西书1:24)

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0181

Joel R. White

引用次数: 0

How Could Paul Accuse Peter of “Living Ethné-ishly” in Antioch (Gal 2:11–21) If Peter Was Eating according to Jewish Dietary Norms? 如果彼得按照犹太人的饮食习惯吃饭，保罗怎么能指责彼得在安提阿“过着不道德的生活”(加拉太书2:11-21)?

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0199

M. Nanos

{"title":"How Could Paul Accuse Peter of “Living Ethné-ishly” in Antioch (Gal 2:11–21) If Peter Was Eating according to Jewish Dietary Norms?","authors":"M. Nanos","doi":"10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0199","url":null,"abstract":"The prevailing readings of the Antioch incident depend on a number of assumptions about the relevant context, including more than a few that remain unexamined, on which several central interpretive decisions about Paul's language depend. These include a fundamental conflict between Pauline and Jerusalem- or Jewish-based Christ-following groups and, following from this, that the mixed meal-time gathering Paul discussed was not conducted according to Jewish dietary norms but instead according to Pauline and thus presumably non-Jewish standards. That is, when Paul accused Peter and the other Jews involved of “living like Gentiles,” Paul thought not only that they should do so but that this consisted of behavior like eating without regard for Jewish dietary halakhah. Traditional as well as New Perspective approaches such as these might be classified as based on and leading to “Paul, not Judaism” readings. This essay challenges these and similar assumptions and related decisions by conducting a close review of Paul's language and the assumptions from which Paul seems to work (as well as the others to whom he refers or writes) and offers a reading based on a very different set of assumptions and decisions that results in a “Paul within Judaism” alternative.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68868148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Editor's Foreword 编辑前言

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/26371753

S. E. Porter

引用次数: 0

The Object of the Law is Realized in Christ: Romans 10:4 and Paul's Justification Teaching 律法的目的在基督里得以实现:罗马书10:4和保罗称义的教导

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0033

Charles Lee Irons

{"title":"The Object of the Law is Realized in Christ: Romans 10:4 and Paul's Justification Teaching","authors":"Charles Lee Irons","doi":"10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0033","url":null,"abstract":"The meaning of telos nomou in Rom 10:4 (“Christ is telos nomou for righteousness to everyone who believes”) has been highly contested, with interpretations falling into two main camps, depending on whether telos is interpreted temporally or teleologically. A taxonomy of interpretations is set forth and a version of the teleological interpretation is defended. It is argued that Paul presupposed that the object of the law was righteousness. The law demanded righteousness (as personal obedience to God's moral will) and offered righteousness (as a status before God) and life to those who kept it. By affirming that Christ is telos nomou, Paul was saying that Christ has realized the object of the law, namely, righteousness. How he did so (by his obedience to the point of death) is not explicitly stated in this text but can be teased out from other Pauline texts. Christ's realization of the object of the law, which he accomplishes as the believer's representative, results in a status of righteousness that is enjoyed by all who believe in him. In addition, Christ's being the telos of the law is intimately related to the concept of “the righteousness of God.” Believers are not righteous by doing the law personally but by receiving the gift of righteousness, the righteousness of God constituted by Christ crucified and risen as their representative. Connections with related justification passages strengthen this interpretation and highlight the notion that righteousness is “reckoned” to believers by a gracious divine act.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68867559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1