Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters最新文献_第3页

J. L. Martyn and Apocalyptic Discontinuity: The Trinitarian, Christological Ground of Galatians in Galatians 4:1–11 马丁和启示录的不连续性:加拉太书的三位一体，基督论基础(加拉太书4:1-11)

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0101

D. Harink

{"title":"J. L. Martyn and Apocalyptic Discontinuity: The Trinitarian, Christological Ground of Galatians in Galatians 4:1–11","authors":"D. Harink","doi":"10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0101","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Louis Martyn is well-known for his “apocalyptic” interpretation of Paul. This interpretation emphasizes divine priority and agency in God’s liberation of humanity, through Christ and the Spirit, from enslaving cosmic powers Sin and Death, the στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου, the Mosaic law. Martyn’s emphasis on divine priority makes the theological aspect of Paul’s letters front, center, and determinative. In this essay, I embrace and deepen Martyn’s theological insight by examining the Trinitarian and Christological ground of Paul’s theology in Gal 4:1–11. By analyzing several theological “moments” in the movement of that text, I clarify two distinct but not separate aspects of apocalyptic discontinuity: (1) discontinuity as the fundamental and absolute distinction between divine and creaturely being, revealed when God at the appointed time sends forth his Son, “born of a woman”; (2) discontinuity as the apocalyptic-messianic “invasion” of the enslaved world (“born under law”), conflict with the powers, and liberation of humanity in the crucifixion/resurrection of Christ. By distinguishing these two forms of apocalyptic discontinuity, I show that in Paul “apocalyptic” is not originally and essentially “invasion” but the peaceable union of divine and human reality in the incarnation. “Invasion” rightly characterizes the entry of this union into an enslaved cosmos, as God liberates humanity for participation in the triune divine life.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41867297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

1 Timothy 2:13–15 as an Analogy 提摩太前书2:13-15作为类比

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0053

Timothy D. Foster

{"title":"1 Timothy 2:13–15 as an Analogy","authors":"Timothy D. Foster","doi":"10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0053","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 While 1 Tim 2:13–15 is often treated as providing three points in support of the paraeneses in vv. 11–12, this article argues that 1 Tim 2:13–15 forms an analogy that draws on the narrative sequence of Gen 2–3 to ground the commands of the preceding verses. The analogy draws a parallel between the events of the garden and the experience of the Ephesian church. It alerts them to the next step in the sequence following the transgression of Eve, which was the temptation and fall of Adam. The analogy is extended in v. 15 to show an alternative outcome whereby the Ephesian women, like Eve, may be saved from the consequences of their sin by embracing “faith, love, and holiness with propriety” as opposed to the rigors demanded by the false teachers. Rather than complete the pattern of the garden in which Eve persuaded Adam to sin, the Ephesian women are to learn peaceably, refrain from teaching the men, and submit themselves to duly appointed authorities. If the preceding verses, especially the demands of vv. 11–12, are grounded in this analogy, then it cannot be claimed that they are based on a “creation mandate,” which permanently subordinates women or forever prevents them from teaching men.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43453803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

God and Paul (in Christ) on Three Visits as the “Two or Three Witnesses” of 2 Corinthians 13:1 上帝和保罗（在基督里）作为哥林多后书13:1的“两三个见证人”三次拜访

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0005

Kenneth Berding

引用次数: 0

Lou Martyn, Paul, and Judaism 卢·马丁，保罗和犹太教

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0112

J. Marcus

引用次数: 0

Reading the Antioch Incident (Gal 2:11–21) as a Subversive Banquet Narrative 将安条克事件（加2:11-21）解读为颠覆性宴会叙事

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0026

M. Nanos

{"title":"Reading the Antioch Incident (Gal 2:11–21) as a Subversive Banquet Narrative","authors":"M. Nanos","doi":"10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0026","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 My previous essay in Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters on the Antioch Incident, on which this essay builds, discussed why the nature of the food or its service were not likely objectionable according to prevailing local Jewish dietary norms. Their Jewish subgroup banquets ate normal Jewish food but did not mix with participants who were not Jews according to prevailing norms. This countercultural practice was likely intended to signify that the non-Jews joining these Jews in their subgroup assemblies were equal members of the righteous ones already and that they must remain non-Jews to demonstrate their subgroup’s “chronometrical” conviction that the awaited end-of-the-ages experience of shalom had begun among themselves. Several questions naturally follow: for example, how was equality specifically performed at these banquets so that the ones who objected could observe it? How was Paul’s confrontation of Peter observed by the non-Jews left behind, for whom it was performed, and at the same time by “the rest of the Jews” who had withdrawn with Peter? In search of the most probable answers, this essay explores Greco-Roman banquet behavioral norms, including the narrative genre devoted to presenting the discussions at symposiums, especially within the philosophical tradition. A common and central topic in banquet practices and in the literary traditions discussing them involved the arrangement of the diners’ places for reclining (or sitting) at the triclinium or adjacent triclinia in order to reflect their relative social ranking properly. This essay will argue that the way they assigned their placement to demonstrate indiscriminate equality among the righteous ones subverted those norms in an easily observable way, from which Peter withdrew to temporarily avoid resistance rather than to retract their Jewish subgroup’s new norms.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46743077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Legacy of J. Louis Martyn: The Interpreter and His Legacy 路易斯·马丁的遗产:解释者和他的遗产

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0094

B. Gaventa

引用次数: 0

Paul, Essentialism, and the Jewish Law: In Conversation with Christine Hayes 保罗、本质论与犹太法律——与克里斯蒂娜·海斯的对话

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.7.1-2.0080

M. Thiessen

引用次数: 0

Enemy Love in Paul: Probing the Engberg-Pedersen and Thorsteinsson Thesis 《保罗的仇人之爱》:恩格斯-佩德森与托斯泰因森理论的探讨

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0115

M. Hubbard

引用次数: 0

Tablets of Fleshly Hearts: Paul and Ezekiel in Concert 心灵的石板:保罗和以西结在一起

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0055

Jeffrey W. Aernie

引用次数: 0

The Antioch Incident Revisited 安提阿事件重访

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0249

Magnus Zetterholm

{"title":"The Antioch Incident Revisited","authors":"Magnus Zetterholm","doi":"10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.2.0249","url":null,"abstract":"The prevailing readings of the Antioch incident depend upon a number of assumptions about the relevant context, including more than a few that remain unexamined, on which several central interpretive decisions about Paul's language depend. These include a fundamental conflict between Pauline and Jerusalem- or Jewish-based Christ-following groups and, following from this, that the mixed meal-time gathering Paul discussed was not conducted according to Jewish dietary norms, but instead according to Pauline and thus presumably non-Jewish standards: that is, when Paul accused Peter and the other Jews involved of “living like Gentiles,” Paul not only thought that they should do so, but that this consisted of behavior like eating without regard for Jewish dietary halakhah. Such traditional as well as New Perspective approaches might be classified as based on and leading to “Paul, not Judaism” readings. This essay challenges these and similar assumptions and related decisions by conducting a close review of Paul's language and the assumptions from which Paul seems to work (as well as the others to whom he refers or writes), and offers a reading based upon a very different set of assumptions and decisions that results in a “Paul within Judaism” alternative.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68867757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1