Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters最新文献

Paul’s View on Christian Suffering: Honor Discourse as a Lens 保罗对基督徒苦难的看法:作为镜头的荣耀话语

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0121

Myriam Klinker-De Klerck

引用次数: 0

Paul’s Use of Jesus Tradition in 1 Corinthians: Legitimate or Otherwise? 保罗在哥林多前书中使用耶稣的传统:合法还是不合法?

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0215

D. Webster

引用次数: 0

Agency as a Theory of Action: A Conversation in Pauline Studies and Analytic Philosophy 作为行动理论的代理:波林研究与分析哲学的对话

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0098

Justin M. Hagerman

引用次数: 0

What the Galatians Want: A Fresh Look at ἃ ἐὰν θέλητε in Galatians 5:17 加拉太人想要什么:重新审视加拉太书5:17中的<s:1> <s:1> <s:1> <s:1> <s:1> ητε

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0181

Caleb T. Friedeman

引用次数: 0

Editor’s Final Introduction: Ten Years of Pauline Studies Draw to a Close 编者的最后介绍:十年的波林研究即将结束

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0093

S. E. Porter

引用次数: 0

Justification and Sin within the Cosmic Conflict in Galatians 加拉太书中宇宙冲突中的称义与罪

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0197

James B. Prothro

引用次数: 0

Are They Not All Israel Who Are Descended from Israel? A Post-Supersessionist Reading of Romans 9:6–13 他们不都是以色列人吗？《罗马书》的后罗马主义解读9:6-13

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0138

Cornelis A. Van Der Gugten

{"title":"Are They Not All Israel Who Are Descended from Israel? A Post-Supersessionist Reading of Romans 9:6–13","authors":"Cornelis A. Van Der Gugten","doi":"10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0138","url":null,"abstract":"One of the key texts used to validate the supersessionist reading of Paul is Rom 9:6b: “For not all Israelites truly belong to Israel.” That reading was challenged in 2004 by Klaus Wengst, who proposed that Rom 9:6b should be read as a rhetorical question: “Are not all out of Israel, even Israel?” The affirmation that “all Israel” is Israel is completely consistent with Rom 9:4–5 and fully coherent with Rom 9:7–13 read as the genealogy of Jacob/Israel as children/sons of God. Wengst’s proposal avoids all the interpretive difficulties and incoherence of the traditional reading of 9:6b, which sees an “Israel” within Israel. Wengst’s reading transfers 9:6b from the supersessionist side to the post-supersessionist side of the debate, with significant implications for the interpretation of Romans and Paul’s theology of Israel and the gentiles. Yet Wengst’s reading has remained virtually unknown within the English-speaking theological community. The purpose of this essay is to make Wengst’s reading better known by presenting a summary of Wengst’s reading, adducing additional supporting arguments, and proposing a fresh post-supersessionist translation of the key verses 9:6–8.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48188761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“To Do the Good”: Galatians 6:9–10, Benefaction, and Honorific Decrees “行善”：加拉太书6:9–10，恩典和敬礼

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0160

J. Brewer

{"title":"“To Do the Good”: Galatians 6:9–10, Benefaction, and Honorific Decrees","authors":"J. Brewer","doi":"10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0160","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Bruce W. Longenecker has proposed a new but influential interpretation of Paul’s command to “do good to all” in his recent book, Remember the Poor. Contrary to standard readings of this passage, Longenecker suggests that Paul intends the Galatians to understand it as a command to serve the poor through financial assistance. To support that thesis, he resources past scholarship that claims “to do the good” in the Greco-Roman context, especially the honorifics and proxeny decrees, referenced material and even financial services. By suggesting such phrasing was “technical terminology for such services,” Longenecker is able significantly to bolster the plausibility of his reading. To test that thesis, this article gives a brief survey of recent discussions on Greco-Roman benefaction and looks closely at several important honorific decrees. The findings suggest that Longenecker’s conclusions are less than certain. Although “to do the good” may be used in reference to material benefits, the phrase was used in a variety of circumstances, often honoring benefactors who rendered immaterial beneficence to the city, such as military service and favorable auguries. Additionally, inscriptions commemorating material benefits often lack the phrase. This article finds that the phrase “to do the good” is a flexible phrase in the inscriptions that suggests service in general rather than a particular kind of service. Therefore, Longenecker’s proposed interpretation is found to lack important external evidence and thus to be dissatisfactory.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44839650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Faithfulness as Subhegemonic Antidote to a Precarious Existence: A Response to Peter-Ben Smit 忠诚是不稳定存在的次霸权解毒剂:对彼得-本·史密特的回应

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.9.1-2.0080

Suzan Sierksma-Agteres

{"title":"Faithfulness as Subhegemonic Antidote to a Precarious Existence: A Response to Peter-Ben Smit","authors":"Suzan Sierksma-Agteres","doi":"10.5325/jstudpaullett.9.1-2.0080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jstudpaullett.9.1-2.0080","url":null,"abstract":"In this response to Peter-Ben Smit’s article in this volume, two questions are discussed. The first intends to review critically one of the main tenets of Peter-Ben Smit’s contribution by asking exactly how fluid and discursive the construction of gender in the Pastoral Epistles was. The second question is whether hegemonic performance of masculinity is the best explanation for the manner of expressing authority in the Pastorals. As a mostly additional yet partly challenging perspective, a related interpretive frame is introduced: philosophical imitation in virtue. As authority is expressed in terms of imitation in virtuous living, it can be better understood as a form of, in Smit’s vocabulary, “subhegemonic” masculinity: a critical rephrasing of the cultural hegemonic norm in terms of self-control that enables participation of “every body,” male and female. Crucial to this philosophical ideal of masculinity is control over one’s self (sōphrosunē) instead of the hegemonic ideal of control over the world outside. In addition to this virtue, it will be argued that in all three Pastoral Epistles the virtue of pistis, “trust” or “faithfulness,” functions to create a reciprocal, inclusive, and divinely modelled network of imitation. Rather than supporting the author’s masculine self-presentation, as Smit holds, pistis functions to balance hegemonically gendered power play.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70856414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supermen and Sissies: Masculinities in Titus and 1 Timothy 超人和娘娘腔:提多和提摩太前书中的男子气概

Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.9.1-2.0062

P. Smit

引用次数: 0