Justification and Sin within the Cosmic Conflict in Galatians

James B. Prothro
{"title":"Justification and Sin within the Cosmic Conflict in Galatians","authors":"James B. Prothro","doi":"10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article treats the place of “justification” within the soteriology of Galatians. Galatians appears to lack some elements in other literature, including Pauline letters (esp. Romans), that cue one to read justification’s conceptual backdrop as a legal-theological one of forgiveness or divine approbation in view of one’s sin. More dominant are images of conflict between God and inimical powers. Some have thus argued that the soteriology of Galatians is incompatible with legal readings of justification, seeing instead a battle between God and cosmic powers replacing a divine courtroom. Building on recent research, this article argues first that the legal conceptualization of justification is itself one of conflict in Jewish and Pauline contexts. Second, it sketches the place of humans, “anti-God powers,” and the redemptive act within the conflict as portrayed in Galatians. It concludes that the legal and conflict images are complementary and that the latter offers a framework in which the former is implied.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article treats the place of “justification” within the soteriology of Galatians. Galatians appears to lack some elements in other literature, including Pauline letters (esp. Romans), that cue one to read justification’s conceptual backdrop as a legal-theological one of forgiveness or divine approbation in view of one’s sin. More dominant are images of conflict between God and inimical powers. Some have thus argued that the soteriology of Galatians is incompatible with legal readings of justification, seeing instead a battle between God and cosmic powers replacing a divine courtroom. Building on recent research, this article argues first that the legal conceptualization of justification is itself one of conflict in Jewish and Pauline contexts. Second, it sketches the place of humans, “anti-God powers,” and the redemptive act within the conflict as portrayed in Galatians. It concludes that the legal and conflict images are complementary and that the latter offers a framework in which the former is implied.
加拉太书中宇宙冲突中的称义与罪
本文论述了“正当性”在加拉太哲学中的地位。加拉太人似乎在其他文学中缺乏一些元素,包括波林书信(尤其是罗马人),这些信件暗示人们将正当理由的概念背景解读为一种法律神学背景,即从罪的角度宽恕或神圣认可。更占主导地位的是上帝和敌对力量之间的冲突图像。因此,一些人认为加拉太人的soteriology与正义的法律解读不兼容,相反,上帝和宇宙力量之间的战斗取代了神圣的法庭。基于最近的研究,本文首先认为,正当性的法律概念本身就是犹太和波林语境中的冲突之一。其次,它描绘了人类的位置,“反上帝的力量”,以及加拉太人所描绘的冲突中的救赎行为。它的结论是,法律形象和冲突形象是互补的,后者提供了一个隐含前者的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书