Agency as a Theory of Action: A Conversation in Pauline Studies and Analytic Philosophy

Justin M. Hagerman
{"title":"Agency as a Theory of Action: A Conversation in Pauline Studies and Analytic Philosophy","authors":"Justin M. Hagerman","doi":"10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The 2006 publication of Human and Divine Agency in Paul and His Cultural Environment, edited by John M. G. Barclay and Simon J. Gathercole, has renewed scholarly attention to questions about agency. In connection with these recent developments in Pauline studies, this article argues, first, that the concept of “agency” remains unperfected among biblical scholars. Second, we engage with the action theories of G. E. M. Anscombe and Donald Davidson. Here we propose that their focus on two concepts—intention and reasons for actions—will contribute to critical analyses of agency as expressed in biblical texts. Third, we bring analytic philosophy into conversation with Troels Engberg-Pedersen’s I-X-S model and J. Louis Martyn’s agent-centered perspective. Fourth, we apply our theoretical model of agency to biblical exegesis by interacting with a selected Pauline text, Rom 7:7–25.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.2.0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2006 publication of Human and Divine Agency in Paul and His Cultural Environment, edited by John M. G. Barclay and Simon J. Gathercole, has renewed scholarly attention to questions about agency. In connection with these recent developments in Pauline studies, this article argues, first, that the concept of “agency” remains unperfected among biblical scholars. Second, we engage with the action theories of G. E. M. Anscombe and Donald Davidson. Here we propose that their focus on two concepts—intention and reasons for actions—will contribute to critical analyses of agency as expressed in biblical texts. Third, we bring analytic philosophy into conversation with Troels Engberg-Pedersen’s I-X-S model and J. Louis Martyn’s agent-centered perspective. Fourth, we apply our theoretical model of agency to biblical exegesis by interacting with a selected Pauline text, Rom 7:7–25.
作为行动理论的代理:波林研究与分析哲学的对话
2006年,约翰·M·G·巴克利和西蒙·J·盖瑟科尔主编的《保罗及其文化环境中的人与神的能动性》一书再次引起了学术界对能动性问题的关注。结合波林研究的这些最新进展,本文认为,首先,“代理”的概念在圣经学者中仍然不完善。其次,我们采用了G.E.M.Anscombe和Donald Davidson的行动理论。在这里,我们提出,他们对两个概念的关注——意图和行动的原因——将有助于对圣经文本中表达的能动性进行批判性分析。第三,我们将分析哲学与Troels Engberg Pedersen的I-X-s模型和J.Louis Martyn的以代理人为中心的视角进行了对话。第四,我们通过与选定的波林文本(罗马书7:7-25)互动,将我们的代理理论模型应用于圣经注释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信