保罗和古代身体的隐喻:重新评估相似之处

Timothy A. Brookins
{"title":"保罗和古代身体的隐喻:重新评估相似之处","authors":"Timothy A. Brookins","doi":"10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paul's image of the church as the “body” of Christ in 1 Cor 12:12–26 has been traced back to a wide variety of social and religious contexts, including Gnosticism, the Jewish Scriptures, Second Temple Jewish thought, rabbinic Judaism, the Christian Eucharistic tradition, Paul's “conversion” experience, the teachings of Jesus, Stoicism, and more. Most recently, interpreters have emphasized the similarities between 1 Cor 12 and homonoia speeches associated with political rhetoric. Focusing on the closest parallels to Paul's text (one passage found in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and another found in the fragments of Hierocles the Stoic), I intend in this article to begin developing a theoretical framework within which to interpret the significance of these parallels to Paul's meaning. The article aims to counteract recent (over)emphasis on ancient cultural commonplaces as a precise matrix for interpreting Pauline parallels and challenges the attending tendency to drown out particularities in the “sea of generalities,” in preference of an explanatory model grounded more firmly in philosophical hermeneutics, the philosophy of language, and established principles in general and cognitive linguistics. The argument emphasizes the inherently “heteroglossic” (many-voiced) nature of any and all discourse, while at the same time emphasizing both the presence of “dominant” voices or echoes, made audible through historical context and linguistic “register,” and the inevitable transformation of language enacted in every new utterance, owing to the fundamentally dialogic and historically contingent nature of language and meaning. Thus, the meaning of Paul's “body” discourse emerges in a tension between a (primarily) Stoic field of reference and novel utterance.","PeriodicalId":29841,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paul and the Ancient Body Metaphor: Reassesing Parallels\",\"authors\":\"Timothy A. Brookins\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paul's image of the church as the “body” of Christ in 1 Cor 12:12–26 has been traced back to a wide variety of social and religious contexts, including Gnosticism, the Jewish Scriptures, Second Temple Jewish thought, rabbinic Judaism, the Christian Eucharistic tradition, Paul's “conversion” experience, the teachings of Jesus, Stoicism, and more. Most recently, interpreters have emphasized the similarities between 1 Cor 12 and homonoia speeches associated with political rhetoric. Focusing on the closest parallels to Paul's text (one passage found in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and another found in the fragments of Hierocles the Stoic), I intend in this article to begin developing a theoretical framework within which to interpret the significance of these parallels to Paul's meaning. The article aims to counteract recent (over)emphasis on ancient cultural commonplaces as a precise matrix for interpreting Pauline parallels and challenges the attending tendency to drown out particularities in the “sea of generalities,” in preference of an explanatory model grounded more firmly in philosophical hermeneutics, the philosophy of language, and established principles in general and cognitive linguistics. The argument emphasizes the inherently “heteroglossic” (many-voiced) nature of any and all discourse, while at the same time emphasizing both the presence of “dominant” voices or echoes, made audible through historical context and linguistic “register,” and the inevitable transformation of language enacted in every new utterance, owing to the fundamentally dialogic and historically contingent nature of language and meaning. Thus, the meaning of Paul's “body” discourse emerges in a tension between a (primarily) Stoic field of reference and novel utterance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/jstudpaullett.6.1.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

保罗在哥林多前书12:12-26中把教会描绘成基督的“身体”,这可以追溯到各种各样的社会和宗教背景,包括诺斯替主义、犹太圣经、第二圣殿犹太思想、拉比犹太教、基督教圣餐传统、保罗的“皈依”经历、耶稣的教导、斯多葛主义等等。最近,口译员强调了哥林多前书12章和与政治修辞相关的同音异义演讲之间的相似之处。专注于最接近保罗文本的相似之处(一段是在哈利卡那苏斯的狄奥尼修斯中发现的,另一段是在斯多葛派的希罗克勒斯的片段中发现的),我打算在这篇文章中开始发展一个理论框架,在这个框架中解释这些相似之处对保罗的意义的重要性。这篇文章的目的是抵制最近(过度)强调古代文化的共性作为一个精确的母体来解释保罗的相似之处,并挑战在“普遍性的海洋”中淹没特殊性的趋势,偏爱一个更牢固地建立在哲学解释学,语言哲学以及一般和认知语言学的既定原则基础上的解释模型。该论点强调了任何和所有话语固有的“异语”(多声)性质,同时强调了“主导”声音或回声的存在,通过历史语境和语言“语域”可以听到,以及由于语言和意义的基本对话和历史偶然性质,在每一个新的话语中实施的语言不可避免的转换。因此,保罗的“身体”话语的意义出现在(主要)斯多葛学派的参考领域和新颖话语之间的紧张关系中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paul and the Ancient Body Metaphor: Reassesing Parallels
Paul's image of the church as the “body” of Christ in 1 Cor 12:12–26 has been traced back to a wide variety of social and religious contexts, including Gnosticism, the Jewish Scriptures, Second Temple Jewish thought, rabbinic Judaism, the Christian Eucharistic tradition, Paul's “conversion” experience, the teachings of Jesus, Stoicism, and more. Most recently, interpreters have emphasized the similarities between 1 Cor 12 and homonoia speeches associated with political rhetoric. Focusing on the closest parallels to Paul's text (one passage found in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and another found in the fragments of Hierocles the Stoic), I intend in this article to begin developing a theoretical framework within which to interpret the significance of these parallels to Paul's meaning. The article aims to counteract recent (over)emphasis on ancient cultural commonplaces as a precise matrix for interpreting Pauline parallels and challenges the attending tendency to drown out particularities in the “sea of generalities,” in preference of an explanatory model grounded more firmly in philosophical hermeneutics, the philosophy of language, and established principles in general and cognitive linguistics. The argument emphasizes the inherently “heteroglossic” (many-voiced) nature of any and all discourse, while at the same time emphasizing both the presence of “dominant” voices or echoes, made audible through historical context and linguistic “register,” and the inevitable transformation of language enacted in every new utterance, owing to the fundamentally dialogic and historically contingent nature of language and meaning. Thus, the meaning of Paul's “body” discourse emerges in a tension between a (primarily) Stoic field of reference and novel utterance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信