Radiology-Artificial Intelligence最新文献

{"title":"Applying Conformal Prediction to a Deep Learning Model for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection to Improve Trustworthiness.","authors":"Cooper Gamble, Shahriar Faghani, Bradley J Erickson","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240032","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryai.240032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To apply conformal prediction to a deep learning (DL) model for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) detection and evaluate model performance in detection as well as model accuracy in identifying challenging cases. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective (November-December 2017) study of 491 noncontrast head CT volumes from the CQ500 dataset, in which three senior radiologists annotated sections containing ICH. The dataset was split into definite and challenging (uncertain) subsets, in which challenging images were defined as those in which there was disagreement among readers. A DL model was trained on patients from the definite data (training dataset) to perform ICH localization and classification into five classes. To develop an uncertainty-aware DL model, 1546 sections of the definite data (calibration dataset) were used for Mondrian conformal prediction (MCP). The uncertainty-aware DL model was tested on 8401 definite and challenging sections to assess its ability to identify challenging sections. The difference in predictive performance (<i>P</i> value) and ability to identify challenging sections (accuracy) were reported. Results The study included 146 patients (mean age, 45.7 years ± 9.9 [SD]; 76 [52.1%] men, 70 [47.9%] women). After the MCP procedure, the model achieved an F1 score of 0.919 for localization and classification. Additionally, it correctly identified patients with challenging cases with 95.3% (143 of 150) accuracy. It did not incorrectly label any definite sections as challenging. Conclusion The uncertainty-aware MCP-augmented DL model achieved high performance in ICH detection and high accuracy in identifying challenging sections, suggesting its usefulness in automated ICH detection and potential to increase trustworthiness of DL models in radiology. <b>Keywords:</b> CT, Head and Neck, Brain, Brain Stem, Hemorrhage, Feature Detection, Diagnosis, Supervised Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Ngum and Filippi in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240032"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142732987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Bridging Artificial Intelligence Models to Clinical Practice: Challenges in Lung Cancer Prediction.","authors":"Xiaonan Shao, Rong Niu","doi":"10.1148/ryai.250080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250080","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 2","pages":"e250080"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Physics-Informed Autoencoder for Prostate Tissue Microstructure Profiling with Hybrid Multidimensional MRI.","authors":"Batuhan Gundogdu, Aritrick Chatterjee, Milica Medved, Ulas Bagci, Gregory S Karczmar, Aytekin Oto","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240167","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryai.240167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate the performance of Physics-Informed Autoencoder (PIA), a self-supervised deep learning model, in measuring tissue-based biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa) using hybrid multidimensional MRI. Materials and Methods This retrospective study introduces PIA, an emerging self-supervised deep learning model that integrates a three-compartment diffusion-relaxation model with hybrid multidimensional MRI. PIA was trained to encode the biophysical model into a deep neural network to predict measurements of tissue-specific biomarkers for PCa without extensive training data requirements. Comprehensive in silico and in vivo experiments, using histopathology measurements as the reference standard, were conducted to validate the model's efficacy in comparison to the traditional nonlinear least squares (NLLS) algorithm. PIA's robustness to noise was tested in in silico experiments with varying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, and in vivo performance for estimating volume fractions was evaluated in 21 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 6.6 [SD]; all male) with PCa (71 regions of interest). Evaluation metrics included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results PIA predicted the reference standard tissue parameters with high accuracy, outperforming conventional NLLS methods, especially under noisy conditions (<i>r</i>_s = 0.80 vs 0.65, <i>P</i> < .001 for epithelium volume at SNR of 20:1). In in vivo validation, PIA's noninvasive volume fraction estimates matched quantitative histology (ICC, 0.94, 0.85, and 0.92 for epithelium, stroma, and lumen compartments, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001 for all). PIA's measurements strongly correlated with PCa aggressiveness (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>P</i> < .001). Furthermore, PIA ran 10 000 faster than NLLS (0.18 second vs 40 minutes per image). Conclusion PIA provided accurate prostate tissue biomarker measurements from MRI data with better robustness to noise and computational efficiency compared with the NLLS algorithm. The results demonstrate the potential of PIA as an accurate, noninvasive, and explainable artificial intelligence method for PCa detection. <b>Keywords:</b> Prostate, Stacked Auto-Encoders, Tissue Characterization, MR-Diffusion-weighted Imaging <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> ©RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Adams and Bressem in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240167"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950878/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143190758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"2024 Manuscript Reviewers: A Note of Thanks.","authors":"Umar Mahmood, Charles E Kahn","doi":"10.1148/ryai.250163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250163","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 2","pages":"e250163"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143711428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Deep Learning-based Aligned Strain from Cine Cardiac MRI for Detection of Fibrotic Myocardial Tissue in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.","authors":"Sven Koehler, Julian Kuhm, Tyler Huffaker, Daniel Young, Animesh Tandon, Florian André, Norbert Frey, Gerald Greil, Tarique Hussain, Sandy Engelhardt","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240303","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryai.240303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>\"Just Accepted\" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in <i>Radiology: Artificial Intelligence</i>. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content.</i> Purpose To develop a deep learning (DL) model that derives aligned strain values from cine (noncontrast) cardiac MRI and evaluate performance of these values to predict myocardial fibrosis in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 139 male patients with DMD who underwent cardiac MRI examinations at a single center between February 2018 and April 2023. A DL pipeline was developed to detect five key frames throughout the cardiac cycle, and respective dense deformation fields, allowing for phase-specific strain analysis across patients and from one key frame to the next. Effectiveness of these strain values in identifying abnormal deformations associated with fibrotic segments was evaluated in 57 patients (15.2 ± 3.1 years), and reproducibility was assessed in 82 patients (12.8 ± 2.7 years), comparing our method with existing feature-tracking and DL-based methods. Statistical analysis compared strain values using <i>t</i> tests, mixed models, and 2000+ ML models, reporting accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity. Results DL-based aligned strain identified five times more differences (29 versus 5, <i>P</i> < .01) between fibrotic and nonfibrotic segments compared with traditional strain values and identified abnormal diastolic deformation patterns often missed by traditional methods. Additionally, aligned strain values enhanced performance of predictive models for myocardial fibrosis detection, improving specificity by 40%, overall accuracy by 17%, and accuracy patients with preserved ejection fraction by 61%. Conclusion The proposed aligned strain technique enables motion-based detection of myocardial dysfunction on contrast free cardiac MRI, facilitating detailed interpatient strain analysis, and allowing precise tracking of disease progression in DMD. ©RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240303"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143504686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Automated Protocoling of Emergency Brain MRI Using Text from Clinical Referrals.","authors":"Heidi J Huhtanen, Mikko J Nyman, Antti Karlsson, Jussi Hirvonen","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>\"Just Accepted\" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in <i>Radiology: Artificial Intelligence</i>. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content.</i> Purpose To develop and evaluate machine learning and deep learning-based models for automated protocoling of emergency brain MRI scans based on clinical referral text. Materials and Methods In this single-institution, retrospective study of 1953 emergency brain MRI referrals from January 2016 to January 2019, two neuroradiologists labeled the imaging protocol and use of contrast agent as the reference standard. Three machine learning algorithms (Naïve Bayes, support vector machine, and XGBoost) and two pretrained deep learning models (Finnish BERT and GPT-3.5) were developed to predict the MRI protocol and need for contrast agent. Each model was trained with three datasets (100% of training data, 50% of training data, and 50% + augmented training data). Prediction accuracy was assessed with test set. Results The GPT-3.5 models trained with 100% of the training data performed best in both tasks, achieving accuracy of 84% (95% CI: 80%-88%) for the correct protocol and 91% (95% CI: 88%-94%) for contrast. BERT had an accuracy of 78% (95% CI: 74%-82%) for the protocol and 89% (95% CI: 86%-92%) for contrast. The best machine learning model in the protocol task was XGBoost (accuracy 78% [95% CI: 73%-82%]), and in the contrast agent task support vector machine and XGBoost (accuracy 88% [95% CI: 84%-91%] for both). The accuracies of two nonneuroradiologists were 80%-83% in the protocol task and 89%-91% in the contrast medium task. Conclusion Machine learning and deep learning models demonstrated high performance in automatic protocoling emergency brain MRI scans based on text from clinical referrals. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e230620"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143450391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Performance of Two Deep Learning-based AI Models for Breast Cancer Detection and Localization on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.","authors":"Marit A Martiniussen, Marthe Larsen, Tone Hovda, Merete U Kristiansen, Fredrik A Dahl, Line Eikvil, Olav Brautaset, Atle Bjørnerud, Vessela Kristensen, Marie B Bergan, Solveig Hofvind","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>\"Just Accepted\" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in <i>Radiology: Artificial Intelligence</i>. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content.</i> Purpose To evaluate cancer detection and marker placement accuracy of two artificial intelligence (AI) models developed for interpretation of screening mammograms. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included data from 129 434 screening examinations (all female, mean age 59.2, SD = 5.8) performed between January 2008 and December 2018 in BreastScreen Norway. Model A was commercially available and B was an in-house model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were calculated. The study defined 3.2% and 11.1% of the examinations with the highest AI scores as positive, threshold 1 and 2, respectively. A radiologic review assessed location of AI markings and classified interval cancers as true or false negative. Results The AUC was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94) for model A and B when including screen-detected and interval cancers. Model A identified 82.5% (611/741) of the screen-detected cancers at threshold 1 and 92.4% (685/741) at threshold 2. For model B, the numbers were 81.8% (606/741) and 93.7% (694/741), respectively. The AI markings were correctly localized for all screen-detected cancers identified by both models and 82% (56/68) of the interval cancers for model A and 79% (54/68) for B. At the review, 21.6% (45/208) of the interval cancers were identified at the preceding screening by either or both models, correctly localized and classified as false negative (<i>n</i> = 17) or with minimal signs of malignancy (<i>n</i> = 28). Conclusion Both AI models showed promising performance for cancer detection on screening mammograms. The AI markings corresponded well to the true cancer locations. ©RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240039"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143190743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Serial MRI-based Deep Learning Model to Predict Survival in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.","authors":"Jia Kou, Jun-Yi Peng, Wen-Bing Lv, Chen-Fei Wu, Zi-Hang Chen, Guan-Qun Zhou, Ya-Qin Wang, Li Lin, Li-Jun Lu, Ying Sun","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230544","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryai.230544","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based prognostic model for predicting survival in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) using serial MRI before and after induction chemotherapy (IC). Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective study included 1039 patients with LA-NPC (779 male and 260 female patients; mean age, 44 years ± 11 [SD]) diagnosed between December 2011 and January 2016. A radiomics-clinical prognostic model (model RC) was developed using pre- and post-IC MRI acquisitions and other clinical factors using graph convolutional neural networks. The concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate model performance in predicting disease-free survival (DFS). The survival benefits of concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) were analyzed in model-defined risk groups. Results The C-indexes of model RC for predicting DFS were significantly higher than those of TNM staging in the internal (0.79 vs 0.53) and external (0.79 vs 0.62, both <i>P</i> < .001) testing cohorts. The 5-year DFS for the model RC-defined low-risk group was significantly better than that of the high-risk group (90.6% vs 58.9%, <i>P</i> < .001). In high-risk patients, those who underwent CCRT had a higher 5-year DFS rate than those who did not (58.7% vs 28.6%, <i>P</i> = .03). There was no evidence of a difference in 5-year DFS rate in low-risk patients who did or did not undergo CCRT (91.9% vs 81.3%, <i>P</i> = .19). Conclusion Serial MRI before and after IC can effectively help predict survival in LA-NPC. The radiomics-clinical prognostic model developed using a graph convolutional network-based deep learning method showed good risk discrimination capabilities and may facilitate risk-adapted therapy. <b>Keywords:</b> Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Deep Learning, Induction Chemotherapy, Serial MRI, MR Imaging, Radiomics, Prognosis, Radiation Therapy/Oncology, Head/Neck <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e230544"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Changes in Artificial Intelligence-derived Case Scores over Time on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Outcomes.","authors":"Samantha P Zuckerman, Senthil Periaswamy, Julie L Shisler, Ameena Elahi, Christine E Edmonds, Jeffrey Hoffmeister, Emily F Conant","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230597","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryai.230597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate the change in digital breast tomosynthesis artificial intelligence (DBT-AI) case scores over sequential screenings. Materials and Methods This retrospective review included 21 108 female patients (mean age ± SD, 58.1 years ± 11.5) with 31 741 DBT screening examinations performed at a single site from February 3, 2020, to September 12, 2022. Among 7000 patients with two or more DBT-AI screenings, 1799 had a 1-year follow-up and were included in the analysis. DBT-AI case scores and differences in case score over time were determined. Case scores ranged from 0 to 100. For each screening outcome (true positive [TP], false positive [FP], true negative [TN], false negative [FN]), mean and median case score change was calculated. Results The highest average case score was seen in TP examinations (average, 75; range, 7-100; <i>n</i> = 41), and the lowest average case score was seen in TN examinations (average, 34; range, 0-100; <i>n</i> = 1640). The largest positive case score change was seen in TP examinations (mean case score change, 21.1; median case score change, 17). FN examinations included mammographically occult cancers diagnosed following supplemental screening and those found at symptomatic diagnostic imaging. Differences between TP and TN mean case score change (<i>P</i> < .001) and between TP and FP mean case score change (<i>P</i> = .02) were statistically significant. Conclusion Using the combination of DBT AI case score with change in case score over time may help radiologists make recall decisions in DBT screening. All studies with high case score and/or case score changes should be carefully scrutinized to maximize screening performance. <b>Keywords:</b> Mammography, Breast, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e230597"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950889/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"RSNA 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge: Review and Outcomes.","authors":"Sebastiaan Hermans, Zixuan Hu, Robyn L Ball, Hui Ming Lin, Luciano M Prevedello, Ferco H Berger, Ibrahim Yusuf, Jeffrey D Rudie, Maryam Vazirabad, Adam E Flanders, George Shih, John Mongan, Savvas Nicolaou, Brett S Marinelli, Melissa A Davis, Kirti Magudia, Ervin Sejdić, Errol Colak","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240334","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryai.240334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate the performance of the winning machine learning models from the 2023 RSNA Abdominal Trauma Detection AI Challenge. Materials and Methods The competition was hosted on Kaggle and took place between July 26 and October 15, 2023. The multicenter competition dataset consisted of 4274 abdominal trauma CT scans, in which solid organs (liver, spleen, and kidneys) were annotated as healthy, low-grade, or high-grade injury. Studies were labeled as positive or negative for the presence of bowel and mesenteric injury and active extravasation. In this study, performances of the eight award-winning models were retrospectively assessed and compared using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), for each injury category. The reported mean values of these metrics were calculated by averaging the performance across all models for each specified injury type. Results The models exhibited strong performance in detecting solid organ injuries, particularly high-grade injuries. For binary detection of injuries, the models demonstrated mean AUC values of 0.92 (range, 0.90-0.94) for liver, 0.91 (range, 0.87-0.93) for splenic, and 0.94 (range, 0.93-0.95) for kidney injuries. The models achieved mean AUC values of 0.98 (range, 0.96-0.98) for high-grade liver, 0.98 (range, 0.97-0.99) for high-grade splenic, and 0.98 (range, 0.97-0.98) for high-grade kidney injuries. For the detection of bowel and mesenteric injuries and active extravasation, the models demonstrated mean AUC values of 0.85 (range, 0.74-0.93) and 0.85 (range, 0.79-0.89), respectively. Conclusion The award-winning models from the artificial intelligence challenge demonstrated strong performance in the detection of traumatic abdominal injuries on CT scans, particularly high-grade injuries. These models may serve as a performance baseline for future investigations and algorithms. <b>Keywords:</b> Abdominal Trauma, CT, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240334"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142584281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}