Deep Learning Model for Real-Time Nuchal Translucency Assessment at Prenatal US.
IF 13.2
Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Yuanji Zhang, Xin Yang, Chunya Ji, Xindi Hu, Yan Cao, Chaoyu Chen, He Sui, Binghan Li, Chaojiong Zhen, Weijun Huang, Xuedong Deng, Linliang Yin, Dong Ni
求助PDF
{"title":"Deep Learning Model for Real-Time Nuchal Translucency Assessment at Prenatal US.","authors":"Yuanji Zhang, Xin Yang, Chunya Ji, Xindi Hu, Yan Cao, Chaoyu Chen, He Sui, Binghan Li, Chaojiong Zhen, Weijun Huang, Xuedong Deng, Linliang Yin, Dong Ni","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence-based model for real-time nuchal translucency (NT) plane identification and measurement in prenatal US assessments. Materials and Methods In this retrospective multicenter study conducted from January 2022 to October 2023, the Automated Identification and Measurement of NT (AIM-NT) model was developed and evaluated using internal and external datasets. NT plane assessment, including identification of the NT plane and measurement of NT thickness, was independently conducted by AIM-NT and experienced radiologists, with the results subsequently audited by radiology specialists and accuracy compared between groups. To assess alignment of artificial intelligence with radiologist workflow, discrepancies between the AIM-NT model and radiologists in NT plane identification time and thickness measurements were evaluated. Results The internal dataset included a total of 3959 NT images from 3153 fetuses, and the external dataset included 267 US videos from 267 fetuses. On the internal testing dataset, AIM-NT achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 for NT plane identification. On the external testing dataset, there was no evidence of differences between AIM-NT and radiologists in NT plane identification accuracy (88.8% vs 87.6%, <i>P</i> = .69) or NT thickness measurements on standard and nonstandard NT planes (<i>P</i> = .29 and .59). AIM-NT demonstrated high consistency with radiologists in NT plane identification time, with 1-minute discrepancies observed in 77.9% of cases, and NT thickness measurements, with a mean difference of 0.03 mm and mean absolute error of 0.22 mm (95% CI: 0.19, 0.25). Conclusion AIM-NT demonstrated high accuracy in identifying the NT plane and measuring NT thickness on prenatal US images, showing minimal discrepancies with radiologist workflow. <b>Keywords:</b> Ultrasound, Fetus, Segmentation, Feature Detection, Diagnosis, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Horii in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240498"},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Purpose To develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence-based model for real-time nuchal translucency (NT) plane identification and measurement in prenatal US assessments. Materials and Methods In this retrospective multicenter study conducted from January 2022 to October 2023, the Automated Identification and Measurement of NT (AIM-NT) model was developed and evaluated using internal and external datasets. NT plane assessment, including identification of the NT plane and measurement of NT thickness, was independently conducted by AIM-NT and experienced radiologists, with the results subsequently audited by radiology specialists and accuracy compared between groups. To assess alignment of artificial intelligence with radiologist workflow, discrepancies between the AIM-NT model and radiologists in NT plane identification time and thickness measurements were evaluated. Results The internal dataset included a total of 3959 NT images from 3153 fetuses, and the external dataset included 267 US videos from 267 fetuses. On the internal testing dataset, AIM-NT achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 for NT plane identification. On the external testing dataset, there was no evidence of differences between AIM-NT and radiologists in NT plane identification accuracy (88.8% vs 87.6%, P = .69) or NT thickness measurements on standard and nonstandard NT planes (P = .29 and .59). AIM-NT demonstrated high consistency with radiologists in NT plane identification time, with 1-minute discrepancies observed in 77.9% of cases, and NT thickness measurements, with a mean difference of 0.03 mm and mean absolute error of 0.22 mm (95% CI: 0.19, 0.25). Conclusion AIM-NT demonstrated high accuracy in identifying the NT plane and measuring NT thickness on prenatal US images, showing minimal discrepancies with radiologist workflow. Keywords: Ultrasound, Fetus, Segmentation, Feature Detection, Diagnosis, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Horii in this issue.
实时产前颈部透明度评估的人工智能模型:高性能和工作流集成。
“刚刚接受”的论文经过了全面的同行评审,并已被接受发表在《放射学:人工智能》杂志上。这篇文章将经过编辑,布局和校样审查,然后在其最终版本出版。请注意,在最终编辑文章的制作过程中,可能会发现可能影响内容的错误。目的建立一种基于人工智能的实时颈部半透明(NT)平面识别和测量模型,用于产前超声评估。材料和方法在这项于2022年1月至2023年10月进行的回顾性多中心研究中,利用内部和外部数据集开发并评估了NT的自动识别和测量(AIM-NT)模型。NT平面评估,包括NT平面的识别和NT厚度的测量,由AIM-NT和经验丰富的放射科医生独立进行,随后由放射科专家审核结果并比较两组之间的准确性。为了评估人工智能与放射科医生工作流程的一致性,我们评估了AIM-NT模型与放射科医生在NT平面识别时间和厚度测量方面的差异。结果内部数据集包括来自3153个胎儿的3959张NT图像,外部数据集包括来自267个胎儿的267个US视频。在内部测试数据集上,AIM-NT实现了接收机工作特征曲线下面积为0.92的NT平面识别。在外部测试数据集上,AIM-NT和放射科医生在NT平面识别准确率(88.8%对87.6%,P = 0.69)或标准和非标准NT平面上NT厚度测量(P = 0.29, 0.59)方面没有差异。AIM-NT在NT平面识别时间和NT厚度测量方面与放射科医生高度一致,77.9%的病例存在1分钟的差异,平均差异为0.03 mm,平均绝对误差为0.22 mm [95% CI: 0.19 mm, 0.25 mm]。结论AIM-NT在产前超声中识别NT平面和测量NT厚度具有较高的准确性,与放射科医生的工作流程差异很小。©RSNA, 2025年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
来源期刊
期刊介绍:
Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.