JURNAL LEGALITAS最新文献

{"title":"Granting Clemency To Narcotics Convicts: Overview From The Political Perspective Of Indonesian Criminal Law","authors":"Irlan Puluhulawa","doi":"10.33756/jelta.v14i2.11147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v14i2.11147","url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to examine the granting of clemency by the president to convicts of narcotics cases in the perspective of legal politics. In Law No. 22 of 2002 concerning Clemency, it does not specifically explain the category of crimes that can or cannot be granted clemency. Also, the Clemency Law does not specify the reasons that can be used by the applicant. There are two main problems in this study, namely (1) What is the mechanism for granting clemency to narcotics convicts? and (2) How is the legal politics of granting clemency by the president to convicts of narcotics cases in the future? This study uses a normative research method with a statutory approach, an analytical and legal conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on this research, it can be concluded that the mechanism for granting clemency to narcotics convicts based on Law No. 22 of 2002 concerning clemency is the same as the mechanism for granting clemency in general or there is no special classification for certain crimes. Then the researcher recommends to revise the clemency law by adding the classification of extraordinary crimes in this case drugs as an exception from granting clemency. Then the consideration of the Supreme Court must take precedence in the clemency application process before appealing to the president.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125674515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Legal Analysis Of The Implementation Of Risk Allocation In Cooperation Schemes With The Government And Business Entities In Infrastructure Provision In Indonesia","authors":"Nabilah Rezkyna, Pupung Faisal, Purnama Trisnamansyah","doi":"10.33756/jelta.v14i2.11828","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v14i2.11828","url":null,"abstract":"Risk allocation is a key feature in government-business partnerships. In the Public Private Partnership scheme, risk allocation is a difficult thing. The transfer of risk to the private sector has an impact on the price of the project. Likewise, allocating risk to the public sector which in practice tends to reduce Value For Money. In addition, project risk is dynamic and changes throughout the life of the project so it cannot be predicted with certainty. This normative research aims to examine the guiding principles for increasing the effectiveness of risk allocation and maximizing Value For Money from existing regulations in Indonesia and Government Cooperation agreements with Business Entities based on best practices in several other countries. The approach used in this paper uses a conceptual and comparative approach. The results obtained from this paper are that it is necessary to identify and anticipate risks including alternative solutions that are adjusted to the principle of risk allocation to minimize risk, as well as adjustments to the matrix that have been made by PT PII, risk allocation principles, best practices and related regulatory frameworks in Indonesia. Result, risks in KPBU projects are often an obstacle in the success of KPBU implementation in Indonesia. To minimize the risks that will be faced or may be faced, it is necessary to identify and anticipate risks including alternative solutions that are adjusted to the principle of risk allocation. In developing an effective risk matrix, innovative thinking is needed that is adapted to the characteristics of the KPBU project and the principles of risk management. This must also be adjusted to the matrix that has been made by PT PII, the principles of risk allocation, best practices and related regulatory frameworks in Indonesia are used as references. If properly implemented, this principle is expected to result in a lower risk premium and lower project costs, thus having a positive impact on the project's stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114633622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diskursus Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Asean Dan Africa Union Sebagai Organisasi Regional","authors":"Grace Christinery Kuhe, Abas Kaluku","doi":"10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10206","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak Perkembangan kontemporer perlindungan HAM telah jauh berkembang hal ini dapat di lihat banyak kawasan regional yang telah mengatur prinsip-prinsip HAM dalam piagam pendirian contohnya Piagam ASEAN dan African Union Constitutive Act. ASEAN dan  Africa Union (AU), di anggap sebagai representatif perlindungan HAM di kawasan regional akan tetapi berbeda dengan AU, ASEAN  masih jauh tertinggal secara konsep hal ini di buktikan masih kuatnya prinsip kedaulatan negara dan prinsip non-intervensi di kawasan ASEAN. Adapun yang menjadi rumusan masalah yaitu adanya diskursus terkait penerapan prinsip non intervensi, kedaulatan negara dan intervensi kemanusian yang menjadi inti permasalahan penegakan HAM di ASEAN. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, menggunakan pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan perbandingan. Untuk dapat mengatasi permasalah pelanggaran HAM di ASEAN maka: (1) ASEAN perlu melakukan pertemuan antar negara guna memperoleh penyelesain permasalahan HAM di dasarkan atas kemufakatan; (2) ASEAN perlu melakukan peninjauan kembali terhadap penerapan prinsip kedaulatan negara dan non intervensi dengan melihat perkembangan hukum internasional kontemporer (3) ASEAN perlu berkomitmen penuh terhadap AICHR guna mendukung ekosistem perlindungan dan penegakan HAM di ASEAN.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131335239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Application Of Territorial Principles Against Pedophile Criminal Act Perpetrators Perpetrated By Foreign Citizens","authors":"Wiranda Putri Madamba, Fenty Puluhulawa, Lisnawaty W Badu, Jufryanto Puluhulawa, Mohamad Rivaldi Moha","doi":"10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.11114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.11114","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesian criminal law adheres to various principles that form the basis for solving problems, especially in problems related to two or more countries. One of the principles recognized and in line with the research, in this case, is the territorial principle, which is a useful principle in determining the limits of validity of criminal law provisions based on place or location. This study aims to analyze the application of the territorial principle to perpetrators of pedophilia crimes committed by foreign nationals. The method used in this study is a normative type of research that uses the law approach and case studies. The results of this study indicate that should be based on the principle of criminal law, namely the territorial principle, Indonesian law will be applied to anyone who commits a crime in Indonesia, including in this case foreign citizens who commit pedophilia crimes, especially a sovereign state has exclusive jurisdiction in the environment. the territory itself is called territorial sovereignty so that the state has full jurisdiction to punish people who commit crimes against the law in the territory of the country. In reality, this territorial principle cannot be applied to this case because the suspect is still in the process of waiting for the results of approval or rejection of extradition by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, considering that the suspect is a foreign citizen and is also a fugitive in his home country, namely the United States of America. so that the country of origin sends a letter of request for extradition and this extradition request is still in the process of being followed up.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129595190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Urgensi Pengaturan Sui Generis Bagi Negara-Negara Ekuator Khususnya Indonesia","authors":"Agung Prayuda Yahya","doi":"10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10209","url":null,"abstract":"Kedudukan dan Pemanfaatan penggunaan GSO sampai dengan saat ini oleh negara berkembang khususnya negara-negara khatulistiwa dinilai masih menjadi masalah karena belum mencerminkan rasionalitas yang berkeadilan. Artikel ini akan membahas dua rumusann masalah yang pertama, bagaimana pengaturan sui generis bagi pemanfaatan GSO terhadap negara ekuator menurut Hukum Internasional? dan yang kedua bagaimana kedudukan Indonesia sebagai negara yang berada di jalur khatulistiwa dan urgensinya dalam pemanfaatan Geostasionary Orbit?. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini adalah mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan sui generis bagi pemanfaatan GSO terhadap negara ekuator menurut Hukum Internasional dan kedudukan Indonesia sebagai negara yang berada di jalur khatulistiwa dan urgensinya dalam pemanfaatan Geostasionary Orbit. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif. Subtansi isi rezim khusus ( sui generis ) usulan negara berkembang, negara khatulistiwa maupun negara lainnya intinya memiliki tuntutan yang relatif sama bahwa pengaturan penggunaan GSO menjadi wewenang UNCOPUOS dan penggunaan GSO dapat diterapkan secara adil dan memperhatikan kepentingan negara-negara khususnya negara yang memiliki karateristik alamiah yang unik dengan GSO, untuk alokasi penggunaan spektrum frekuensi dilakukan secara adil yang berdasar pada ketentuan dalam ITU. Sebagai suatu Negara yang berada di bawah garis khatulistiwa terpanjang membuat Indonesia menjadi negara yang memiliki posisi yang panjangnya sama dengan segment GSO yang terdapat di atas wilayah Indonesia.  Sehingga, untuk kepentingan Indonesia kedepannya, maka pemanfaatan segment GSO yang terdapat di wilayah bangsa Indonesia harus selalu dapat terjamin guna untuk kelangsungan serta keamanan dalam memanfaatkan segmen GSO itu sendiri.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132295454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pengaturan Sanksi Pidana Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Waktu Bencana Alam","authors":"Muhammad Rosikhu, Johan Rahmatulloh","doi":"10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10286","url":null,"abstract":"Tulisan ini membahas tentang pengaturan sanksi pidana mati bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi di waktu bencana alam. Dalam ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi disebutkan bahwa Dalam hal tindak pidana korupsi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam ayat (1) dilakukan dalam keadaan tertentu, pidana mati dapat dijatuhkan. Dalam penjelasan Pasal 2 ayat (2) , yang dimaksud dengan keadaan tertentu adalah keadaan yang dapat dijadikan alasan pemberatan pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi yaitu apabila tindak pidana tersebut dilakukan terhadap dana-dana yang diperuntukkan bagi penanggulangan keadaan bahaya, bencana alam nasional, penanggulangan akibat kerusuhan sosial yang meluas, penanggulangan krisis ekonomi dan moneter, dan pengulangan tindak pidana korupsi. Dalam ketentuan Pasal maupun Penjelasan Pasal tersebut terdapat kata atau frasa yang menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum karena memiliki makna ganda yakni kata “dapat” dan frasa “bencana alam nasional” yang masih tidak jelas. Sehingga argumentasi yang dibangun oleh penegak hukum yakni didasarkan bahwa penerapan sanksi pidana mati tidak dapat dijatuhkan bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi jika tidak ada status bencana alam nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua pendekatan yakni pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual yang bersumber dari pendapat ahli hukum, buku-buku dan media massa.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129321894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diskriminasi Rasial Dan Etnis Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional","authors":"Defira Martina Adrian, Fence M Wantu, A. H. Tome","doi":"10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V14I01.10189","url":null,"abstract":"Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa Politik Hukum Pemerintah Indonesia dalam mencegah isu Rasialisme dan Etnis, juga untuk mengetahui Politik Hukum Pemerintah Indonesia dalam mencegah isu Rasialisme dan Etnis dikaji melalui aturan Hukum Internasional. Jenis Penelitian yang digunakan peneliti adalah jenis penelitian normatif, adapun pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini antara lain: Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (Statue Approach) dan Pendekatan Kasus (Case Approach). Hasil penelitian menggambarkan bahwa pelaksanaan diskriminasi ras dan etnis masih kerap terjadi dalam masyarakat. Indonesia sendiri sudah mempunyai aturan yang dinilai bagus untuk menangani dan menghapus kasus diskriminasi rasial dan etnis namun masih banyak yang belum mengetahui dan mendengar tentang aturan tersebut. Maka dari itu, aturan yang ada dinilai kurang populer karena kurangnya sosialisasi sehingga implementasi terjadi hanya seputar penindakan namun masih lemah pada aspek pencegahan. Maka dari itu pemerintah harus lebih banyak memberikan edukasi terhadap rakyat tentang adanya peraturan mengenai penghapusan diskriminasi rasial dan etnis ini. Sehingga, pelanggaran berupa penghinaan suatu ras dan etnis tertentu tidak lagi dianggap biasa atau sepele dan peraturan ini juga dapat berjalan dengan baik.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132427714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Jaminan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja Kepada Tenaga Kerja Konstruksi","authors":"Condro Susanto Riyadi, Mutia Ch. Thalib","doi":"10.33756/JELTA.V13I02.7607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V13I02.7607","url":null,"abstract":"Tujuan Penelitian adalah untuk  Mengetahui dan Menganalisis tentang Perlindungan Hukum Jaminan Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Konstruksi di Provinsi Gorontalo. Jenis Penelitian yang digunakan oleh peneliti dalam menyusun Penelitian ini adalah jenis Penelitian normatif-empiris, Adapun pendekatan yang digunakan oleh peneliti dalam menyusun penelitian ini adalah, antara lain: Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (Statue Approach); Pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil Penelitian ini menujukkan: Pertama, bahwa Perlindungan Hukum Jaminan Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Konstruksi di Provinsi Gorontalo. sampai dengan saat ini berdasarkan temuan penelitian yang didapatkan dari narasumber telah berjalan dengan baik, sebab hampir sebagian besar perusahaan konstruksi telah memenuhi kewajibannya untuk memberikan jaminan asuransi kepada para pekerjanya. Kemudian terkait dengan implementasi K3 dalam aspek pemenuhan standar keselamatan kerja melalui alat pelindung diri (APD) semuanya disediakan oleh pihak perusahaan kepada para pekerjanya. Dengan demikian dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa sejauh ini jaminan perlindungan hukum terkait dengan kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja (K3) berjalan dengan baik di provinsi Gorontalo. Kedua, bahwa Faktor Penghambat Perlindungan Hukum Jaminan Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Konstruksi di Provinsi Gorontalo. Adapun hasil indentfikasi mengenai hambatan yang dimaksud, yakni: Lemahnya Pengawasan Ketenagkerjaan; Faktor Sumber Daya Manusia; Faktor Anggaran; Faktor Kesedaran Pekerja; dan Kurangya Kesadaran Pimpinan Perusahaan untuk mendaftarakan Pekerja ke dalam program Jaminan Sosial Tenaga Kerja (Jamsostek).","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127776426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Podcast : Penyiaran Atau Layanan Konten Audio Melalui Internet (Over the Top) Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia","authors":"Alvin Daniel Silaban, Muhammad Amirulloh, Laina Rafianti","doi":"10.33756/JELTA.V13I02.8325","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V13I02.8325","url":null,"abstract":"Tujuan Penulisan yang ingin dicapai pada kajian ini adalah untuk menjawab 2 (dua) pertanyaan sebagai rumusan masalah yaitu  pertama , bagaimana kualifikasi  podcast  berdasarkan hukum positif di Indonesia? dan  kedua , bagaimana pengaturan  podcast  sebagai penyiaran berbasis internet berdasarkan hukum positif di Indonesia?. Kedua rumusan masalah ini akan dijawab dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan meneliti bahan kepustakaan serta mengkaji hukum positif yang berhubungan dengan Hukum Teknologi, Informasi dan Komunikasi dan Hukum Penyiaran. Berdasarkan hasil kajian artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa  podcast  digolongkan dalam layanan konten audio  Over The Top , bukan penyiaran. Karakteristik  podcast  yang hampir sama dengan radio, tetapi tidak serta merta disebut sebagai suatu penyiaran sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 1 angka 2 UU Penyiaran. Hal ini berimplikasi pada pengaturan  podcast  yang tidak dapat diatur dalam Undang-undang Penyiaran. Lebih lanjut, Undang-undang ITE tidak dapat menjadi jawaban dalam pengaturan  podcast  karena tidak mengatur secara rinci teknis dan prosedur dalam penyelenggaraan  podcast  di Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122330463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perlindungan Hukum Korban Penipuan Transaksi Jual Beli Online Melalui Ganti Rugi Sebagai Pidana Tambahan","authors":"Silvony Kakoe, Masruchin Ruba’i, Abd. Madjid","doi":"10.33756/JELTA.V13I02.7612","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33756/JELTA.V13I02.7612","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak Kewajiban ganti rugi terhadap korban pada dasarnya telah dapat dikatakan sebagai pemenuhan restorative justice dimana merupakan konsep keadilan yang sedang ingin dicapai dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu tujuan penulisan ini untuk menguraikan pentingnya bentuk perlindungan hukum kepada korban penipuan transaksi jual beli online dilihat dari perspektif Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sekaligus untuk mendeskripsikan apakah ganti rugi sebagai pidana tambahan dapat ditetapkan sebagai upaya melindungi korban penipuan melalui transaksi jual beli online. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian dalam tulisan ini menunjukan bahwa Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik hanya mengatur tentang pidana pokok terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penipuan transaksi jual beli online dan tidak secara tegas mengatur tentang ganti rugi yang mestinya didapatkan oleh korban dari tindak pidana penipuan melalui transaksi jual beli online. Pentingnya ganti rugi dalam bentuk restutusi sebagai pidana tambahan agar supaya ganti rugi tidak hanya menjadi opsi untuk melindungi korban tetapi menjadi kewajiban untuk dipenuhi oleh setiap pelaku tindak pidana ketika tindak pidana yang dilakukannya berakibat kerugian bagi korban penipuan transaksi jual beli online. Abstract Obligation to compensate victims basically could be said as a fulfillment of restorative justice which is the concept of justice that is being achieved in the renewal of criminal law in Indonesia. Therefore , the purpose of this paper is to describe the importance of legal protection for victims of online trading transaction fraud from the perspective of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law, also to describe whether compensation as an additional crime can be determined as an effort to protect victims of fraud through online trading transactions. The research method used in this paper is juridical normative, used a conceptual and statute approach. The results of this study indicate that the Electronic Information and Transaction Law only regulated the principal crimes against the perpetrators of fraudulent acts of online trading transactions and did not explicitly regulate the compensation that should be obtained by victims of fraudulent criminal acts through online buying and selling transactions. The importance of compensation in the form of restutution as an additional crime so that compensation is not only being an option to protect victims but also as the obligation which should be fulfilled by every criminal offender when their crimes had disadvantaged the victims of fraudulent online trading transactions.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115303868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}