Psychological bulletin最新文献

{"title":"AI aversion or appreciation? A capability-personalization framework and a meta-analytic review.","authors":"Xin Qin, Xiang Zhou, Chen Chen, Dongyuan Wu, Hansen Zhou, Xiaowei Dong, Limei Cao, Jackson G Lu","doi":"10.1037/bul0000477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming human life. While some studies find that people prefer humans over AI (AI aversion), others find the opposite (AI appreciation). To reconcile these conflicting findings, we introduce the Capability-Personalization Framework. This theoretical framework posits that when deciding between AI and humans in a context, individuals focus on two dimensions: (a) perceived capability of AI and (b) perceived necessity for personalization. We propose that AI appreciation occurs when (a) AI is perceived as more capable than humans and (b) personalization is perceived as unnecessary in a given decision context, whereas AI aversion occurs when these conditions are not met. Our Capability-Personalization Framework is substantiated by a meta-analysis of 442 effect sizes from 163 studies (N = 82,078): AI appreciation occurs (d = 0.27, 95% CI [0.17, 0.37]) when AI is perceived as more capable than humans and personalization is perceived as unnecessary in a given decision context; otherwise, AI aversion occurs (d = -0.50, 95% CI [-0.63, -0.37]). Moderation analyses suggest that AI appreciation is more pronounced for tangible robots (vs. intangible algorithms), for attitudinal (vs. behavioral) outcomes, in between-subjects (vs. within-subjects) study designs, and in low unemployment countries, while AI aversion is more pronounced in countries with high levels of education and internet use. Overall, our integrative framework and meta-analysis advance knowledge about AI-human preferences and offer valuable implications for AI developers and users. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"151 5","pages":"580-599"},"PeriodicalIF":17.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144249295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supplemental Material for Handedness in Mental and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Second-Order Meta-Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/bul0000471.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000471.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144229356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supplemental Material for The Predictive Power of Autobiographical Memory in Shaping the Mental Health of Young People: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/bul0000474.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000474.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144229348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supplemental Material for Ignored, Dismissed, and Minimized: Understanding the Harmful Consequences of Invalidation in Health Care—A Systematic Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/bul0000473.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000473.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144229352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Electronic screen use and children's socioemotional problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.","authors":"Roberta Pires Vasconcellos, Taren Sanders, Chris Lonsdale, Philip Parker, James Conigrave, Samantha Tang, Borja Del Pozo Cruz, Stuart J H Biddle, Rachael Taylor, Christine Innes-Hughes, Katariina Salmela-Aro, Diego Vasconcellos, Katrina Wilhite, Ella Tremaine, Bridget Booker, Michael Noetel","doi":"10.1037/bul0000468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic screens are everywhere and are easily accessible to children. Parents report fears that screens cause socioemotional problems. But most research has been cross-sectional, making it difficult to establish causality. We reviewed the longitudinal evidence to answer two fundamental questions: Does screen use lead to socioemotional problems, and do socioemotional problems lead children to use screens more often? A total of 132 longitudinal studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. From these, 117 studies (292,739 children; 2,284 effects) were meta-analyzed. Small significant associations were found in both directions: Screen use led to socioemotional problems, b = 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.02, 0.11], p ≤ 0.05, n = 200,018, K = 117, and socioemotional problems led to greater screen use (b = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.12], p = .01, n = 200,018, K = 117). Moderation analyses showed stronger effects in both directions when screens were used for gaming than for other purposes: Socioemotional problems led to more gaming behavior (b = 0.44, 95% CI [0.29, 0.60], n = 80,809, K = 31), and playing games led to later socioemotional problems (b = 0.32, 95% CI [0.23, 0.42], n = 80,809, K = 31). The reciprocal relationship between socioemotional problems and screen use was moderated by children's age, total screen time at baseline, and type of socioemotional problem (i.e., externalizing and internalizing behavior). Compared with prior cross-sectional studies, our temporal evidence reinforces the benefits of screen time guidelines but suggests a change in focus. Instead of merely emphasizing the reduction of screen time, guidelines should prioritize improving the quality of screen content and enhancing social interactions during screen use. Additionally, screen time guidelines should discourage high levels of the most high-risk behaviors like gaming. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"151 5","pages":"513-543"},"PeriodicalIF":17.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144249297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effectiveness of psychotherapy: Synthesis of a \"meta-analytic research domain\" across world regions and 12 mental health problems.","authors":"Mathias Harrer, Clara Miguel, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Marketa Ciharova, Constantin Yves Plessen, Paula Kuper, Antonia A Sprenger, Claudia Buntrock, Davide Papola, Ioana A Cristea, Nino de Ponti, Đorđe Bašić, Darin Pauley, Ellen Driessen, Soledad Quero, Jorge Grimaldos, Sara Fernández Buendía, Cristina Botella, Jessica L Hamblen, Paula P Schnurr, Sadie E Larsen, Rory A Pfund, Emma Motrico, Irene Gómez-Gómez, Kim Setkowski, Minoo Matbouriahi, Yingying Wang, Josine Rawee, Heleen Riper, Annemieke van Straten, Marit Sijbrandij, Stefan Leucht, Toshi A Furukawa, Eirini Karyotaki, Pim Cuijpers","doi":"10.1037/bul0000465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000465","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scientific output generated in psychology has surged in recent decades, including the number of studies investigating psychological treatments. To keep track of all this evidence, we developed the \"Metapsy\" meta-analytic research domain: a comprehensive system of open databases and tailored software that allows for rapid evidence generation. We leverage this novel infrastructure to summarize the effect of psychological treatment across 12 mental health problems and trace back the global expansion of psychotherapy research over the past 50 years. Including 1,029 studies with 85,952 patients, our results indicate small to moderate average benefits in treating psychosis (g = 0.32), suicidal ideation (g = 0.34), borderline personality disorder (g = 0.46), and prolonged grief (g = 0.49). In contrast, psychological interventions have large average effects on depression (g = 0.73), problem gambling (g = 0.80), panic (g = 0.83), generalized anxiety (g = 0.86), social anxiety (g = 0.95), obsessive-compulsive (g = 1.18), posttraumatic stress disorder (g = 1.18), and phobias (g = 1.25). Most available evidence (83.4%-86.1%) comes from high-income and Western countries, but their dominance is declining. We found no indication that psychotherapy is less effective in low- and middle-income countries (g = 0.38-2.41) or non-Western cultures (g = 0.74-2.20). We discuss ways to further enhance psychotherapy's public health impact, as well as how the meta-analytic research domain concept may be extended to other types of psychological research in the future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"151 5","pages":"600-667"},"PeriodicalIF":17.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144249296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"How physical activity context relates to cognition across the lifespan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Myrto F Mavilidi, Spyridoula Vazou, David R Lubans, Katie Robinson, Andrew J Woods, Valentin Benzing, Sofia Anzeneder, Katherine B Owen, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Levi Wade, Jade Burley, George Thomas, Anthony D Okely, Caterina Pesce","doi":"10.1037/bul0000478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000478","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although numerous reviews and meta-analyses have examined the effects of physical activity on cognition, no previous meta-analysis has comprehensively explored the role of contextual factors. In this systematic review, we examined the role of contextual moderators along with more commonly investigated individual (e.g., age) and physical activity-related moderators (e.g., intensity, type). A multilevel meta-analysis was applied to 171 chronic (654 effect sizes) and 68 acute studies (305 effect sizes) involving 48,625 participants from preschool to older adulthood. On average, small positive effects on cognition were found for participation in both chronic (g = 0.25, 95% CI [0.19, 0.31]) and acute physical activity (g = 0.21, 95% CI [0.12, 0.30]). Physical activity effects on cognition seem to be jointly moderated by contextual and physical activity-related factors. The largest effect sizes were depicted for chronic practice of outdoor physical activity of moderate-to-vigorous intensity (g = 0.63, 95% CI [0.41; 0.85]) and with high cognitive demand (g = 0.53, 95% CI [0.15, 0.91]), and for acute bouts of outdoor physical activity of moderate intensity (g = 0.71, 95% CI [0.42, 0.99]). These results may inform the design of future chronic and acute physical activity trials to foster a more comprehensive understanding of the intersection between multiple moderators. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"151 5","pages":"544-579"},"PeriodicalIF":17.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144249298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Handedness in mental and neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and second-order meta-analysis.","authors":"Julian Packheiser,Jette Borawski,Gesa Berretz,Sarah Alina Merklein,Marietta Papadatou-Pastou,Sebastian Ocklenburg","doi":"10.1037/bul0000471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000471","url":null,"abstract":"Several meta-analyses on hand preference in mental and neurodevelopmental disorders have been published in the last decade. Some disorders, like schizophrenia, have been associated with increased rates of atypical hand preference (i.e., non-right-, left-, or mixed-hand preference)-but others, like depression, have not. To identify overarching patterns between hand preference and psychopathology and estimate the influence of potential moderators independent of diagnosis, we need to leverage rich information in the databases of these meta-analyses and conduct a higher level of analysis of meta-analytic data across diagnoses. To this end, we performed a second-order meta-analysis after reviewing, updating, and reanalyzing previously published meta-analyses on hand preference in various mental and neurodevelopmental disorders. In total, this study includes 402 data sets totaling 202,434 individuals. On average, atypical hand preference had a significantly higher frequency in cases compared to controls (nonright odds ratio [OR]: 1.46, 95% CI [1.35, 1.59]; left OR: 1.34, 95% CI [1.22, 1.48]; mixed OR: 1.63, 95% CI [1.38, 1.93]). Further analyses indicated that case-control differences varied with diagnosis. Some diagnoses, like schizophrenia, are associated with a high frequency of atypical hand preference (nonright OR: 1.50, 95% CI [1.32, 1.70]; left OR: 1.37, 95% CI [1.17, 1.61]; mixed OR: 1.70, 95% CI [1.19, 2.44]). Moderator analyses showed that neurodevelopmental conditions, nonneurodevelopmental conditions with an early age of onset, and conditions that include symptoms related to language were all associated with higher rates of atypical hand preference. This finding suggests that the association between handedness and clinical conditions is best understood from a transdiagnostic, developmental, and symptom-focused perspective. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"8 1","pages":"476-512"},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143897313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intuitive deontology? A systematic review and multivariate, multilevel meta-analysis of experimental studies on the psychological drivers of moral judgments.","authors":"Alina Fahrenwaldt,Jerome Olsen,Rima-Maria Rahal,Susann Fiedler","doi":"10.1037/bul0000472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000472","url":null,"abstract":"Humans often face moral dilemmas posing a conflict between two motives: deontology (rule-following, e.g., \"thou shalt not kill\") and utilitarianism (greater-good-maximization, e.g., sacrificing one for many). A long-standing debate concerns the influence of cognitive processing on moral judgments in such dilemmas. One popular dual process account suggests that intuition favors \"deontological\" judgments, whereas \"utilitarian\" judgments require more reflection. We conducted a comprehensive multilevel, multivariate meta-analysis to assess the cumulative evidence favoring intuitive deontology, its heterogeneity within and across studies, and its robustness to bias. Following established standards, our search for published and gray literature identified 731 unique effects nested in 139 studies from 80 reports meeting our eligibility criteria. Overall, we found a significant but small effect favoring intuitive deontology (OR = 1.18, 95% CI [1.10, 1.26]; p < .0001). We also observed substantial effect heterogeneity stemming from differences within and between studies. Results were robust to outliers, and we found no consistent indications of publication bias. Our preregistered exploration of various moderators resulted in significant explanation of the residual variance by manipulation and dilemma type, with the highest effects of intuitive deontology found for studies using foreign language or induction manipulations and the footbridge dilemma. In a post hoc analysis, restricting the data set to dilemma actions requiring personal force and instrumentality, we found an increased effect of intuitive deontology (OR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.19, 1.42]). Results question the universality of intuitive deontology, inform current discussions on the effect's underlying mechanisms, and call for more carefully designed studies testing the effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"9 1","pages":"428-454"},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143897315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ignored, dismissed, and minimized: Understanding the harmful consequences of invalidation in health care-A systematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research.","authors":"Allyson C Bontempo,John M Bontempo,Paul R Duberstein","doi":"10.1037/bul0000473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000473","url":null,"abstract":"The upsurge in the prevalence of contested, ambiguous, and difficult-to-diagnose illnesses presents challenges for clinicians who too often respond by invalidating patients' symptoms. Although numerous qualitative studies have reported the effects of invalidation on patients' psychological and behavioral outcomes, this body of research has not been systematically reviewed. Informed by Linehan's (1993) conceptualization of invalidation, this systematic review elucidated the negative consequences, of symptom invalidation, or the dismissal or minimization of a person's experiences with illness. We reviewed 151 qualitative reports representing 11,307 individuals with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, endometriosis, fibromyalgia syndrome, Gulf War syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, long COVID, multiple chemical sensitivity, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and vulvodynia. Consistent with Linehan's theorizing, thematic analysis identified four broad classes of consequences: induced emotional states and beliefs (e.g., shame, suicidality), induced health care emotional states and beliefs (e.g., health care-related anxiety and trauma), induced health care behavior (e.g., health care system avoidance), and diagnostic delay. Informed by these findings, we developed a novel conceptual model explaining how symptom invalidation leads to these consequences and thereby undermines health outcomes. Future work should explore the proposed conceptual model and identify theoretically informed interventions and policies aimed at preventing symptom invalidation to improve psychological, behavioral, and health outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"48 1","pages":"399-427"},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143897316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}